
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-2630 v2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $919 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $1,069 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 610.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 49.8 vs 7.0 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $1,069 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Vega 3, while Xeon E5-2630 v2 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,468 vs 7,490).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 15 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2630 v2, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
Xeon E5-2630 v2
2013Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅+275% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 8.
- ✅400% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.0 vs 49.8 PassMark/$ ($1,069 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon Gold PRO 3150G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
2020Xeon E5-2630 v2
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $919 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $1,069 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 610.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 49.8 vs 7.0 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $1,069 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Vega 3, while Xeon E5-2630 v2 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅+275% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 8.
- ✅400% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,468 vs 7,490).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 15 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2630 v2, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.0 vs 49.8 PassMark/$ ($1,069 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon Gold PRO 3150G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon Gold PRO 3150G better than Xeon E5-2630 v2?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Athlon Gold PRO 3150G | Xeon E5-2630 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Athlon Gold PRO 3150G | Xeon E5-2630 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 173 FPS | 174 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 123 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 157 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 113 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 112 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 80 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Athlon Gold PRO 3150G | Xeon E5-2630 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 183 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 130 FPS | 187 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Athlon Gold PRO 3150G | Xeon E5-2630 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 187 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon Gold PRO 3150G and Xeon E5-2630 v2

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 7,468 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2630 v2
Xeon E5-2630 v2
The Xeon E5-2630 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,490 points. Launch price was $250.
Processing Power
The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5-2630 v2 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-2630 v2 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon E5-2630 v2 — a 22.9% clock advantage for the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G uses the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon E5-2630 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G scores 7,468 against the Xeon E5-2630 v2's 7,490 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon E5-2630 v2. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G vs 15 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2630 v2.
| Feature | Athlon Gold PRO 3150G | Xeon E5-2630 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz+26% | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+35% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 15 MB (total)+275% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core)+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 12 nm-45% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Picasso (2019−2022) | Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) |
| PassMark | 7,468 | 7,490 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 549 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 3,654 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2630 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2933 on the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G versus DDR3-1600 on the Xeon E5-2630 v2 — the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2630 v2 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 169.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Athlon Gold PRO 3150G) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2630 v2). PCIe lanes: 8 (Athlon Gold PRO 3150G) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2630 v2) — the Xeon E5-2630 v2 offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM4 (Athlon Gold PRO 3150G) and C602,C600 (Xeon E5-2630 v2).
| Feature | Athlon Gold PRO 3150G | Xeon E5-2630 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933+33% | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 768 GB+1100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 40+400% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Athlon Gold PRO 3150G) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2630 v2). The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Vega 3), while the Xeon E5-2630 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon E5-2630 v2 targets Server.
| Feature | Athlon Gold PRO 3150G | Xeon E5-2630 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Vega 3 | — |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Server |
Value Analysis
The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G launched at $150 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-2630 v2 debuted at $1069. On MSRP ($150 vs $1069), the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G is $919 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G delivers 49.8 pts/$ vs 7.0 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2630 v2 — making the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G the 150.7% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon Gold PRO 3150G | Xeon E5-2630 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-86% | $1069 |
| Performance per Dollar | 49.8+611% | 7.0 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2013 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













