Athlon Gold PRO 3150G vs Xeon D-1537

CPU

GPU

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2020

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Xeon D-1537

8 Cores16 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2015

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G

4 / 4

7,468

+0.3%

Ryzen Embedded R1606G

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon D-1537

8 / 16

7,444

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 1.5 MB).
✅Costs $320 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $470 MSRP).
✅Delivers 214.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 49.8 vs 15.8 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $470 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-1537, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Xeon D-1537

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon Gold PRO 3150G across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (7,444 vs 7,468).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (1.5 MB vs 4 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.8 vs 49.8 PassMark/$ ($470 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon Gold PRO 3150G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G

2020

Xeon D-1537

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 1.5 MB).
✅Costs $320 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $470 MSRP).
✅Delivers 214.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 49.8 vs 15.8 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $470 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-1537, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon Gold PRO 3150G across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (7,444 vs 7,468).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (1.5 MB vs 4 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.8 vs 49.8 PassMark/$ ($470 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon Gold PRO 3150G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon Gold PRO 3150G better than Xeon D-1537?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon D-1537 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Athlon Gold PRO 3150G is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon Gold PRO 3150G is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 7.8% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon Gold PRO 3150G is the better fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 166.7% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 1.5 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G is the smarter buy today. Athlon Gold PRO 3150G is $320 cheaper on MSRP at $150 MSRP versus $470 MSRP, and it gives you a 7.8% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 214.3% better value on MSRP (49.8 vs 15.8 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2015), 166.7% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 1.5 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G Benchmark Check

Xeon D-1537 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Athlon Gold PRO 3150G	Xeon D-1537
1080p
low	165 FPS	158 FPS
medium	141 FPS	136 FPS
high	110 FPS	110 FPS
ultra	89 FPS	90 FPS
1440p
low	142 FPS	133 FPS
medium	119 FPS	112 FPS
high	92 FPS	88 FPS
ultra	74 FPS	72 FPS
4K
low	65 FPS	62 FPS
medium	58 FPS	56 FPS
high	46 FPS	43 FPS
ultra	36 FPS	34 FPS

Open Athlon Gold PRO 3150G Open Xeon D-1537

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Athlon Gold PRO 3150G	Xeon D-1537
1080p
low	187 FPS	126 FPS
medium	173 FPS	114 FPS
high	158 FPS	107 FPS
ultra	128 FPS	86 FPS
1440p
low	173 FPS	110 FPS
medium	147 FPS	100 FPS
high	133 FPS	93 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	76 FPS
4K
low	129 FPS	86 FPS
medium	112 FPS	81 FPS
high	89 FPS	71 FPS
ultra	66 FPS	55 FPS

Open Athlon Gold PRO 3150G Open Xeon D-1537

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Athlon Gold PRO 3150G	Xeon D-1537
1080p
low	187 FPS	186 FPS
medium	187 FPS	186 FPS
high	187 FPS	186 FPS
ultra	187 FPS	186 FPS
1440p
low	187 FPS	186 FPS
medium	187 FPS	186 FPS
high	187 FPS	186 FPS
ultra	187 FPS	186 FPS
4K
low	187 FPS	186 FPS
medium	183 FPS	186 FPS
high	160 FPS	186 FPS
ultra	130 FPS	186 FPS

Open Athlon Gold PRO 3150G Open Xeon D-1537

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Athlon Gold PRO 3150G	Xeon D-1537
1080p
low	187 FPS	186 FPS
medium	187 FPS	186 FPS
high	187 FPS	186 FPS
ultra	187 FPS	186 FPS
1440p
low	187 FPS	186 FPS
medium	187 FPS	186 FPS
high	187 FPS	186 FPS
ultra	187 FPS	186 FPS
4K
low	187 FPS	186 FPS
medium	187 FPS	186 FPS
high	187 FPS	186 FPS
ultra	187 FPS	186 FPS

Open Athlon Gold PRO 3150G Open Xeon D-1537

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon Gold PRO 3150G and Xeon D-1537

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G

The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 7,468 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon D-1537

The Xeon D-1537 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 November 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (per core). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1667. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,444 points. Launch price was $470.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon D-1537 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon D-1537 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G versus 2.3 GHz on the Xeon D-1537 — a 51.6% clock advantage for the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G (base: 3.5 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G uses the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon D-1537 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G scores 7,468 against the Xeon D-1537's 7,444 — a 0.3% lead for the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G vs 1.5 MB (per core) on the Xeon D-1537.

Feature	Athlon Gold PRO 3150G	Xeon D-1537
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	8 / 16+100%
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+70%	2.3 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+106%	1.7 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)+167%	1.5 MB (per core)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)+100%	256K (per core)
Process	12 nm-14%	14 nm
Architecture	Picasso (2019−2022)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	7,468	7,444

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon D-1537 uses FCBGA1667 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Athlon Gold PRO 3150G	Xeon D-1537
Socket	AM4	FCBGA1667
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2933	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	8	—

🔧

Advanced Features

The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Vega 3), while the Xeon D-1537 requires a dedicated GPU.

Feature	Athlon Gold PRO 3150G	Xeon D-1537
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	AMD Radeon Vega 3	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G launched at $150 MSRP, while the Xeon D-1537 debuted at $470. On MSRP ($150 vs $470), the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G is $320 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G delivers 49.8 pts/$ vs 15.8 pts/$ for the Xeon D-1537 — making the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G the 103.5% better value option.