
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
Popular choices:

Core i5-9300H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
2020Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-9300H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Core i5-9300H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
Core i5-9300H
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,438 vs 7,468).
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
2020Core i5-9300H
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-9300H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Core i5-9300H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,438 vs 7,468).
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon Gold PRO 3150G better than Core i5-9300H?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Athlon Gold PRO 3150G | Core i5-9300H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Athlon Gold PRO 3150G | Core i5-9300H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 173 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 186 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 162 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 143 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 178 FPS |
| medium | 112 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 102 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Athlon Gold PRO 3150G | Core i5-9300H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 187 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 186 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 187 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 186 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 183 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 186 FPS |
| ultra | 130 FPS | 186 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Athlon Gold PRO 3150G | Core i5-9300H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 187 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 186 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 187 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 186 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 187 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 186 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 186 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon Gold PRO 3150G and Core i5-9300H

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 7,468 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i5-9300H
Core i5-9300H
The Core i5-9300H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,438 points. Launch price was $250.
Processing Power
The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i5-9300H's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G versus 4.1 GHz on the Core i5-9300H — a 5% clock advantage for the Core i5-9300H (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G uses the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture (12 nm), while the Core i5-9300H uses Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G scores 7,468 against the Core i5-9300H's 7,438 — a 0.4% lead for the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G vs 8 MB on the Core i5-9300H.
| Feature | Athlon Gold PRO 3150G | Core i5-9300H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz | 4.1 GHz+5% |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+46% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 8 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 1 MB+100% |
| Process | 12 nm-14% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Picasso (2019−2022) | Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 7,468 | 7,438 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 4,729 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,050 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 3,700 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-9300H uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2933 memory speed. The Core i5-9300H supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (Athlon Gold PRO 3150G) vs 16 (Core i5-9300H) — the Core i5-9300H offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM4 (Athlon Gold PRO 3150G) and HM370 (Core i5-9300H).
| Feature | Athlon Gold PRO 3150G | Core i5-9300H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | BGA1440 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 128 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 16+100% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Athlon Gold PRO 3150G) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-9300H). Both include integrated graphics — AMD Radeon Vega 3 (Athlon Gold PRO 3150G) and Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Core i5-9300H) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-9300H targets Gaming Laptop.
| Feature | Athlon Gold PRO 3150G | Core i5-9300H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Vega 3 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Gaming Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













