
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
Popular choices:

Core i5-13400F
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $46 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Vega 3, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,468 vs 25,029).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 49.8 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +148.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+400% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Delivers 156.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 49.8 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅150% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌30.7% HIGHER MSRP$196 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon Gold PRO 3150G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
2020Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $46 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Vega 3, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +148.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+400% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Delivers 156.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 49.8 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅150% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,468 vs 25,029).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 49.8 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌30.7% HIGHER MSRP$196 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon Gold PRO 3150G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13400F better than Athlon Gold PRO 3150G?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Athlon Gold PRO 3150G | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Athlon Gold PRO 3150G | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 173 FPS | 464 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 389 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 356 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 458 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 345 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 301 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 280 FPS |
| medium | 112 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 231 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 204 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Athlon Gold PRO 3150G | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 530 FPS |
| medium | 187 FPS | 449 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 415 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 375 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 490 FPS |
| medium | 187 FPS | 422 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 382 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 343 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 183 FPS | 331 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 130 FPS | 246 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Athlon Gold PRO 3150G | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 626 FPS |
| medium | 187 FPS | 626 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 626 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 626 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 626 FPS |
| medium | 187 FPS | 626 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 598 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 521 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 187 FPS | 492 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 439 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 382 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon Gold PRO 3150G and Core i5-13400F

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 7,468 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i5-13400F
Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.
Processing Power
The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-13400F offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F — a 16.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G uses the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture (12 nm), while the Core i5-13400F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G scores 7,468 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 108.1% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F.
| Feature | Athlon Gold PRO 3150G | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 10 / 16+150% |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz | 4.6 GHz+18% |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+40% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 20 MB (total)+400% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% |
| Process | 12 nm | Intel 7 nm-42% |
| Architecture | Picasso (2019−2022) | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 7,468 | 25,029+235% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 16,211 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,407 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 11,408 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-13400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2933 on the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F — the Core i5-13400F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (Athlon Gold PRO 3150G) vs 20 (Core i5-13400F) — the Core i5-13400F offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM4 (Athlon Gold PRO 3150G) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F).
| Feature | Athlon Gold PRO 3150G | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 192 GB+200% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 20+150% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Athlon Gold PRO 3150G) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F). The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Vega 3), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Athlon Gold PRO 3150G | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Vega 3 | — |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G launched at $150 MSRP, while the Core i5-13400F debuted at $196. On MSRP ($150 vs $196), the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G is $46 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G delivers 49.8 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-13400F — making the Core i5-13400F the 87.8% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon Gold PRO 3150G | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-23% | $196 |
| Performance per Dollar | 49.8 | 127.7+156% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













