
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
Popular choices:

Core i5-10400F
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $10 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Vega 3, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,468 vs 13,029).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 49.8 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +70.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Delivers 63.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 49.8 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Athlon Gold PRO 3150G.
Trade-offs
- ❌6.7% HIGHER MSRP$160 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon Gold PRO 3150G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
2020Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $10 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Vega 3, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +70.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Delivers 63.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 49.8 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Athlon Gold PRO 3150G.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,468 vs 13,029).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 49.8 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Trade-offs
- ❌6.7% HIGHER MSRP$160 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon Gold PRO 3150G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-10400F better than Athlon Gold PRO 3150G?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Athlon Gold PRO 3150G | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Athlon Gold PRO 3150G | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 326 FPS |
| medium | 173 FPS | 318 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 290 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 253 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 326 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 292 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 267 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 234 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 309 FPS |
| medium | 112 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 199 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Athlon Gold PRO 3150G | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 326 FPS |
| medium | 187 FPS | 326 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 326 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 326 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 326 FPS |
| medium | 187 FPS | 326 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 326 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 326 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 326 FPS |
| medium | 183 FPS | 326 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 289 FPS |
| ultra | 130 FPS | 229 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Athlon Gold PRO 3150G | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 326 FPS |
| medium | 187 FPS | 326 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 326 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 326 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 326 FPS |
| medium | 187 FPS | 326 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 326 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 326 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 326 FPS |
| medium | 187 FPS | 326 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 326 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 326 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon Gold PRO 3150G and Core i5-10400F

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 7,468 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i5-10400F
Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.
Processing Power
The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-10400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-10400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G versus 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F — a 9.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G uses the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture (12 nm), while the Core i5-10400F uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G scores 7,468 against the Core i5-10400F's 13,029 — a 54.3% lead for the Core i5-10400F. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F.
| Feature | Athlon Gold PRO 3150G | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz | 4.3 GHz+10% |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+21% | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 12 MB (total)+200% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 12 nm-14% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Picasso (2019−2022) | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 7,468 | 13,029+74% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 8,191 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,454 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 5,783 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-10400F uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2933 memory speed. The Core i5-10400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (Athlon Gold PRO 3150G) vs 16 (Core i5-10400F) — the Core i5-10400F offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM4 (Athlon Gold PRO 3150G) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F).
| Feature | Athlon Gold PRO 3150G | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 128 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 16+100% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Athlon Gold PRO 3150G) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F). The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Vega 3), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Athlon Gold PRO 3150G | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Vega 3 | — |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G launched at $150 MSRP, while the Core i5-10400F debuted at $160. On MSRP ($150 vs $160), the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G is $10 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G delivers 49.8 pts/$ vs 81.4 pts/$ for the Core i5-10400F — making the Core i5-10400F the 48.2% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon Gold PRO 3150G | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-6% | $160 |
| Performance per Dollar | 49.8 | 81.4+63% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













