G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

A10G

2021

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 12 GB).
✅Draws 150W instead of 200W, a 50W reduction.
✅Measures 267mm instead of 304mm, a 37mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (13,598 vs 26,919).
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
317.4% HIGHER MSRP
$2,500 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

✅+98% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $1,901 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 726.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌33.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 150W.
❌13.9% longer card at 304mm vs 267mm.

A10G

2021

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 12 GB).
✅Draws 150W instead of 200W, a 50W reduction.
✅Measures 267mm instead of 304mm, a 37mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Why buy it

✅+98% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $1,901 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 726.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (13,598 vs 26,919).
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
317.4% HIGHER MSRP
$2,500 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌33.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 150W.
❌13.9% longer card at 304mm vs 267mm.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than A10G?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4070 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 26,919 vs 13,598 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4070 is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while A10G is a 2021 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2021, 98.0% more raw performance headroom, better upscaling support with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 5nm process instead of 8nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4070 is about $1,901 cheaper on MSRP at $599 MSRP versus $2,500 MSRP, and you are getting 98.0% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 726.2%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is A10G still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. A10G is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $2,500 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4070 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

A10G Benchmark Check

GeForce RTX 4070 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	A10G	GeForce RTX 4070
1080p
low	262 FPS	183 FPS
medium	251 FPS	167 FPS
high	214 FPS	151 FPS
ultra	175 FPS	131 FPS
1440p
low	238 FPS	150 FPS
medium	202 FPS	124 FPS
high	161 FPS	110 FPS
ultra	132 FPS	101 FPS
4K
low	134 FPS	92 FPS
medium	110 FPS	78 FPS
high	83 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	76 FPS	58 FPS

Open A10G Open GeForce RTX 4070

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	A10G	GeForce RTX 4070
1080p
low	493 FPS	544 FPS
medium	414 FPS	454 FPS
high	328 FPS	353 FPS
ultra	274 FPS	299 FPS
1440p
low	346 FPS	351 FPS
medium	277 FPS	288 FPS
high	225 FPS	235 FPS
ultra	185 FPS	197 FPS
4K
low	182 FPS	172 FPS
medium	151 FPS	144 FPS
high	128 FPS	125 FPS
ultra	104 FPS	101 FPS

Open A10G Open GeForce RTX 4070

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	A10G	GeForce RTX 4070
1080p
low	612 FPS	884 FPS
medium	490 FPS	713 FPS
high	408 FPS	643 FPS
ultra	306 FPS	569 FPS
1440p
low	459 FPS	684 FPS
medium	367 FPS	549 FPS
high	306 FPS	483 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	424 FPS
4K
low	306 FPS	467 FPS
medium	245 FPS	373 FPS
high	204 FPS	326 FPS
ultra	153 FPS	277 FPS

Open A10G Open GeForce RTX 4070

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	A10G	GeForce RTX 4070
1080p
low	612 FPS	751 FPS
medium	490 FPS	612 FPS
high	408 FPS	536 FPS
ultra	306 FPS	497 FPS
1440p
low	459 FPS	615 FPS
medium	367 FPS	500 FPS
high	306 FPS	433 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	395 FPS
4K
low	306 FPS	384 FPS
medium	245 FPS	324 FPS
high	204 FPS	301 FPS
ultra	153 FPS	272 FPS

Open A10G Open GeForce RTX 4070

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A10G and GeForce RTX 4070

A10G

The A10G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 9216 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,598 points.

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the A10G scores 13,598 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 98%. The A10G is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 9,216 (A10G) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Raw compute: 31.52 TFLOPS (A10G) vs 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070). Boost clocks: 1710 MHz vs 2475 MHz. Ray tracing: 72 RT cores (A10G) vs 46 (GeForce RTX 4070) with 288 Tensor cores vs 184.

Feature	A10G	GeForce RTX 4070
G3D Mark Score	13,598	26,919+98%
Architecture	Ampere	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	8 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	9216+57%	5888
Compute (TFLOPS)	31.52 TFLOPS+8%	29.15 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1710 MHz	2475 MHz+45%
ROPs	96+50%	64
TMUs	288+57%	184
L1 Cache	9 MB+55%	5.8 MB
L2 Cache	6 MB	36 MB+500%
Ray Tracing Cores	72+57%	46
Tensor Cores	288+57%	184

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The A10G lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The A10G relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	A10G	GeForce RTX 4070
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The A10G comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB. The A10G offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (A10G) vs 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	A10G	GeForce RTX 4070
VRAM Capacity	24 GB+100%	12 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6X
Bus Width	128-bit	192-bit+50%
L2 Cache	6 MB	36 MB+500%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (A10G) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

Feature	A10G	GeForce RTX 4070
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	0	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (A10G) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (A10G) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070).

Feature	A10G	GeForce RTX 4070
Encoder	NVENC 7th Gen	8th Gen NVENC (2x)
Decoder	NVDEC 5th Gen	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The A10G draws 150W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 28.6% difference. The A10G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (A10G) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 304mm, occupying 1 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: Unknown vs 80°C.

Feature	A10G	GeForce RTX 4070
TDP	150W-25%	200W
Recommended PSU	500W-23%	650W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	8-pin
Length	267mm	304mm
Height	112mm	137mm
Slots	1-67%	3
Temp (Load)	Unknown-100%	80°C
Perf/Watt	90.7	134.6+48%

💰

Value Analysis

The A10G launched at $2500 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599. The GeForce RTX 4070 costs 76% less ($1901 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.4 (A10G) vs 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 731.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).