G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

A10G

2021

Why buy it

✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (13,598 vs 22,651).
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
526.6% HIGHER MSRP
$2,500 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅+66.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $2,101 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 943.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

A10G

2021

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).

Why buy it

✅+66.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $2,101 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 943.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (13,598 vs 22,651).
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
526.6% HIGHER MSRP
$2,500 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than A10G?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 66.6% higher PassMark G3D performance and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. It also comes from 2023 instead of 2021, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2021, 66.6% more raw performance headroom, better upscaling support with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 5nm process instead of 8nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is about $2,101 cheaper on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $2,500 MSRP, and you are getting 66.6% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 943.7%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is A10G still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. A10G is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $2,500 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

A10G Benchmark Check

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	A10G	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
1080p
low	262 FPS	177 FPS
medium	251 FPS	162 FPS
high	214 FPS	142 FPS
ultra	175 FPS	124 FPS
1440p
low	238 FPS	143 FPS
medium	202 FPS	118 FPS
high	161 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	132 FPS	93 FPS
4K
low	134 FPS	93 FPS
medium	110 FPS	79 FPS
high	83 FPS	66 FPS
ultra	76 FPS	59 FPS

Open A10G Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	A10G	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
1080p
low	493 FPS	425 FPS
medium	414 FPS	359 FPS
high	328 FPS	292 FPS
ultra	274 FPS	237 FPS
1440p
low	346 FPS	270 FPS
medium	277 FPS	229 FPS
high	225 FPS	186 FPS
ultra	185 FPS	154 FPS
4K
low	182 FPS	117 FPS
medium	151 FPS	95 FPS
high	128 FPS	77 FPS
ultra	104 FPS	60 FPS

Open A10G Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	A10G	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
1080p
low	612 FPS	855 FPS
medium	490 FPS	693 FPS
high	408 FPS	609 FPS
ultra	306 FPS	510 FPS
1440p
low	459 FPS	660 FPS
medium	367 FPS	527 FPS
high	306 FPS	452 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	382 FPS
4K
low	306 FPS	447 FPS
medium	245 FPS	355 FPS
high	204 FPS	308 FPS
ultra	153 FPS	255 FPS

Open A10G Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	A10G	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
1080p
low	612 FPS	775 FPS
medium	490 FPS	639 FPS
high	408 FPS	558 FPS
ultra	306 FPS	492 FPS
1440p
low	459 FPS	613 FPS
medium	367 FPS	503 FPS
high	306 FPS	435 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	378 FPS
4K
low	306 FPS	375 FPS
medium	245 FPS	322 FPS
high	204 FPS	298 FPS
ultra	153 FPS	255 FPS

Open A10G Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A10G and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

A10G

The A10G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 9216 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,598 points.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the A10G scores 13,598 versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 22,651 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 66.6%. The A10G is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 9,216 (A10G) vs 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Raw compute: 31.52 TFLOPS (A10G) vs 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Boost clocks: 1710 MHz vs 2535 MHz. Ray tracing: 72 RT cores (A10G) vs 34 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) with 288 Tensor cores vs 136.

Feature	A10G	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
G3D Mark Score	13,598	22,651+67%
Architecture	Ampere	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	8 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	9216+112%	4352
Compute (TFLOPS)	31.52 TFLOPS+43%	22.06 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1710 MHz	2535 MHz+48%
ROPs	96+100%	48
TMUs	288+112%	136
L1 Cache	9 MB+109%	4.3 MB
L2 Cache	6 MB	32 MB+433%
Ray Tracing Cores	72+112%	34
Tensor Cores	288+112%	136

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The A10G lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The A10G relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	A10G	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The A10G comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has 8 GB. The A10G offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (A10G) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	A10G	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
VRAM Capacity	24 GB+200%	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	6 MB	32 MB+433%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (A10G) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

Feature	A10G	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	0	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (A10G) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (A10G) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti).

Feature	A10G	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Encoder	NVENC 7th Gen	8th Gen NVENC
Decoder	NVDEC 5th Gen	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The A10G draws 150W versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 160W — a 6.5% difference. The A10G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (A10G) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 240mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: Unknown vs 70°C.

Feature	A10G	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
TDP	150W-6%	160W
Recommended PSU	500W-9%	550W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	8-pin
Length	267mm	240mm
Height	112mm	111mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	Unknown-100%	70°C
Perf/Watt	90.7	141.6+56%

💰

Value Analysis

The A10G launched at $2500 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti costs 84% less ($2101 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.4 (A10G) vs 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 951.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).