
A10G
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
A10G
2021Why buy it
- ✅+72.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌1577.9% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 150W vs 75W.
- ❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,351 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 871% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 150W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,869 vs 13,598).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
A10G
2021GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅+72.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,351 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 871% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 150W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌1577.9% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 150W vs 75W.
- ❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,869 vs 13,598).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Quick Answers
So, is A10G better than GeForce GTX 1650?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1650 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | A10G | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 251 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 214 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 175 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 238 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 50 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 27 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 24 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | A10G | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 493 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 328 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 346 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 277 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 185 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 15 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | A10G | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 612 FPS | 323 FPS |
| medium | 490 FPS | 283 FPS |
| high | 408 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 306 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 459 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 367 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 306 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 117 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 306 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 245 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 204 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 153 FPS | 50 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | A10G | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 612 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 490 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 408 FPS | 191 FPS |
| ultra | 306 FPS | 166 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 459 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 367 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 306 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 113 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 306 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 245 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 204 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 153 FPS | 51 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A10G and GeForce GTX 1650

A10G
A10G
The A10G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 9216 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,598 points.

GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the A10G scores 13,598 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the A10G leads by 72.8%. The A10G is built on Ampere while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 9,216 (A10G) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 31.52 TFLOPS (A10G) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1710 MHz vs 1665 MHz.
| Feature | A10G | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,598+73% | 7,869 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 9216+929% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 31.52 TFLOPS+956% | 2.984 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1710 MHz+3% | 1665 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+200% | 32 |
| TMUs | 288+414% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 9 MB+923% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+500% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The A10G relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | A10G | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The A10G comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The A10G offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (A10G) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the A10G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | A10G | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB+500% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+500% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (A10G) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.
| Feature | A10G | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (A10G) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (A10G) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).
| Feature | A10G | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | NVDEC 4th gen |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The A10G draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (A10G) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 267mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: Unknown vs 70°C.
| Feature | A10G | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 75W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 300W-40% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 267mm | 229mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | Unknown-100% | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 90.7 | 104.9+16% |
Value Analysis
The A10G launched at $2500 MSRP, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 94% less ($2351 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.4 (A10G) vs 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 877.8% better value. The A10G is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | A10G | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500 | $149-94% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.4 | 52.8+878% |
| Codename | GA102 | TU117 |
| Release | April 12 2021 | April 23 2019 |
| Ranking | #182 | #323 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













