
A10G
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
A10G
2021Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌616.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,151 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 643.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: A10G is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
A10G
2021GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,151 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 643.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌616.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: A10G is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than A10G?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does A10G make more sense than GeForce RTX 2060?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | A10G | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 251 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 214 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 175 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 238 FPS | 95 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 60 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 27 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | A10G | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 493 FPS | 290 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 328 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 346 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 277 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 185 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 57 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | A10G | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 612 FPS | 635 FPS |
| medium | 490 FPS | 508 FPS |
| high | 408 FPS | 423 FPS |
| ultra | 306 FPS | 318 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 459 FPS | 476 FPS |
| medium | 367 FPS | 381 FPS |
| high | 306 FPS | 318 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 238 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 306 FPS | 318 FPS |
| medium | 245 FPS | 254 FPS |
| high | 204 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 153 FPS | 159 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | A10G | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 612 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 490 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 408 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 306 FPS | 244 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 459 FPS | 357 FPS |
| medium | 367 FPS | 302 FPS |
| high | 306 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 193 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 306 FPS | 204 FPS |
| medium | 245 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 204 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 153 FPS | 119 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A10G and GeForce RTX 2060

A10G
A10G
The A10G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 9216 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,598 points.

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
The A10G scores 13,598 and the GeForce RTX 2060 reaches 14,114 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The A10G is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 2060 uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 9,216 (A10G) vs 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060). Raw compute: 31.52 TFLOPS (A10G) vs 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060). Boost clocks: 1710 MHz vs 1680 MHz. Ray tracing: 72 RT cores (A10G) vs 30 (GeForce RTX 2060) with 288 Tensor cores vs 240.
| Feature | A10G | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,598 | 14,114+4% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 9216+380% | 1920 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 31.52 TFLOPS+389% | 6.451 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1710 MHz+2% | 1680 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+100% | 48 |
| TMUs | 288+140% | 120 |
| L1 Cache | 9 MB+374% | 1.9 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+100% | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 72+140% | 30 |
| Tensor Cores | 288+20% | 240 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The A10G relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | A10G | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The A10G comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2060 has 6 GB. The A10G offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (A10G) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) — the A10G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | A10G | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB+300% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+100% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (A10G) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | A10G | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (A10G) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (A10G) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060).
| Feature | A10G | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | NVDEC (Turing) |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The A10G draws 150W versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 160W — a 6.5% difference. The A10G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (A10G) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: Unknown vs 72.
| Feature | A10G | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-6% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 229mm |
| Height | 112mm | 113mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | Unknown-100% | 72 |
| Perf/Watt | 90.7+3% | 88.2 |
Value Analysis
The A10G launched at $2500 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349. The GeForce RTX 2060 costs 86% less ($2151 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.4 (A10G) vs 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 648.1% better value. The A10G is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | A10G | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500 | $349-86% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.4 | 40.4+648% |
| Codename | GA102 | TU106 |
| Release | April 12 2021 | January 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #182 | #168 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













