
A10G
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
A10G
2021Why buy it
- ✅+35.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 180W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌904% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌54.3% longer card at 267mm vs 173mm.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,251 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 643.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 267mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,064 vs 13,598).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌20% higher power demand at 180W vs 150W.
A10G
2021GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅+35.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 180W, a 30W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,251 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 643.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 267mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌904% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌54.3% longer card at 267mm vs 173mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,064 vs 13,598).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌20% higher power demand at 180W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
So, is A10G better than GeForce GTX 1060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | A10G | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 251 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 214 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 175 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 238 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 55 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | A10G | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 493 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 328 FPS | 148 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 113 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 346 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 277 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 185 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 41 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | A10G | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 612 FPS | 453 FPS |
| medium | 490 FPS | 362 FPS |
| high | 408 FPS | 302 FPS |
| ultra | 306 FPS | 226 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 459 FPS | 340 FPS |
| medium | 367 FPS | 272 FPS |
| high | 306 FPS | 226 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 306 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 245 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 204 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 153 FPS | 113 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | A10G | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 612 FPS | 358 FPS |
| medium | 490 FPS | 302 FPS |
| high | 408 FPS | 260 FPS |
| ultra | 306 FPS | 226 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 459 FPS | 299 FPS |
| medium | 367 FPS | 254 FPS |
| high | 306 FPS | 208 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 306 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 245 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 204 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 153 FPS | 102 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A10G and GeForce GTX 1060

A10G
A10G
The A10G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 9216 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,598 points.

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the A10G scores 13,598 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the A10G leads by 35.1%. The A10G is built on Ampere while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 9,216 (A10G) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 31.52 TFLOPS (A10G) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060). Boost clocks: 1710 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | A10G | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,598+35% | 10,064 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 9216+260% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 31.52 TFLOPS+255% | 8.873 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1710 MHz | 1733 MHz+1% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 288+80% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 9 MB+857% | 0.94 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+200% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The A10G relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | A10G | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The A10G comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB. The A10G offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (A10G) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) — the A10G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | A10G | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB+300% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+200% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (A10G) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | A10G | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (A10G) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (A10G) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060).
| Feature | A10G | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | NVDEC (Pascal) |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The A10G draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 18.2% difference. The A10G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (A10G) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 173mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | A10G | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-17% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 400W-20% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 173mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | Unknown | — |
| Perf/Watt | 90.7+62% | 55.9 |
Value Analysis
The A10G launched at $2500 MSRP, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 90% less ($2251 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.4 (A10G) vs 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 648.1% better value. The A10G is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2016).
| Feature | A10G | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500 | $249-90% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.4 | 40.4+648% |
| Codename | GA102 | GP104 |
| Release | April 12 2021 | May 27 2016 |
| Ranking | #182 | #137 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













