GeForce GTX 760 vs Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 760

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

4813

G3D Mark Score

4765

Performance Difference

GeForce GTX 760 is 1.0% faster than Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

GeForce GTX 7604096 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLow
15%
low60%
medium30%
high4%
ultra4%
1440pLimited
7%
low30%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

4 GB VRAM Β· 4,813 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLow settings needed for 60 FPS.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Radeon HD 7950 / R9 2803072 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLow
10%
low42%
medium14%
high4%
ultra4%
1440pLimited
6%
low24%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

3 GB VRAM Β· 4,765 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLow settings needed for 60 FPS.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, GeForce GTX 760 performs 1.0% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between GeForce GTX 760 and Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for GeForce GTX 760 and Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 760

The GeForce GTX 760 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,813 points. Launch price was $249.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32
TMUs:96
Vram:4096 MB
L1 Cache:96 kB
L2 Cache:512 kB
Core Clock:980 MHz
Boost Clock:1033 MHz
Shading Units:1152
Max Temperature:97 Β°C
Transistor Count:3,540 million
Texture Fill Rate:99.07
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):170 Watt
Floating Point Performance:2.378 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GK104
Architecture:Kepler (2012βˆ’2018)
Launch Price:$249
Release Date:June 25 2013
Performance Ranking Position:450
AMD

Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280

The Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. Boost clock: 1250 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,765 points. Launch price was $449.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32
TMUs:112
Vram:3072 MB
L1 Cache:448 kB
L2 Cache:768 kB
Boost Clock:1250 MHz
Shading Units:1792
Transistor Count:4,313 million
Texture Fill Rate:89.60
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):200 Watt
Floating Point Performance:2.867 TFLOPS
Quantidade De Transportadores Compute:28

General Information

Design:reference
Codename:Tahiti
Architecture:GCN 1.0 (2012βˆ’2020)
Launch Price:$449
Release Date:January 31 2012
Performance Ranking Position:454

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 760 and Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280