
GeForce GTX 760
Popular choices:

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 760
2013Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 250W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌24.5% HIGHER MSRP$249 MSRPvs$200 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 19.3 vs 24.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H
2020Why buy it
- ✅87.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $49 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 25.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.3 vs 19.3 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 760: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 760 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌47.1% higher power demand at 250W vs 170W.
GeForce GTX 760
2013Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H
2020Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 250W, a 80W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅87.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $49 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 25.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.3 vs 19.3 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 760: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 760 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌24.5% HIGHER MSRP$249 MSRPvs$200 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 19.3 vs 24.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌47.1% higher power demand at 250W vs 170W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H better than GeForce GTX 760?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 760 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 760 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 66 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 53 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 60 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 760 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 124 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 45 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 32 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 17 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 55 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 760 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 217 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 173 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 108 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 54 FPS | 55 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 760 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 48 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 55 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 760 and Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H

GeForce GTX 760
GeForce GTX 760
The GeForce GTX 760 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,813 points. Launch price was $249.


Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2105 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,852 points. Launch price was $579.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 760 scores 4,813 and the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H reaches 4,852 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760 is built on Kepler while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,152 (GeForce GTX 760) vs 3,840 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H). Raw compute: 2.378 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760) vs 16.17 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H). Boost clocks: 1033 MHz vs 2105 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,813 | 4,852 |
| Architecture | Kepler | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1152 | 3840+233% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.378 TFLOPS | 16.17 TFLOPS+580% |
| Boost Clock | 1033 MHz | 2105 MHz+104% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 96 | 240+150% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 768 KB+700% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 760 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 760 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 760 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 760) vs 4 MB (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H) — the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 760 draws 170W versus the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H's 250W — a 38.1% difference. The GeForce GTX 760 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 760) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs None.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W-32% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | None |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 28.3+46% | 19.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 760 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H launched at $200. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H costs 19.7% less ($49 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 19.3 (GeForce GTX 760) vs 24.3 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H) — the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H offers 25.9% better value. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $200-20% |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.3 | 24.3+26% |
| Codename | GK104 | Navi 21 |
| Release | June 25 2013 | October 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #450 | #65 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













