
GeForce GTX 760
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 760
2013Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌352.7% HIGHER MSRP$249 MSRPvs$55 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 19.3 vs 87.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $55 MSRP).
- ❌161.5% higher power demand at 170W vs 65W.
Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $194 less on MSRP ($55 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 351.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 87.3 vs 19.3 G3D/$ ($55 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 760: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 760 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 170W, a 105W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
GeForce GTX 760
2013Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
2018Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $194 less on MSRP ($55 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 351.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 87.3 vs 19.3 G3D/$ ($55 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 760: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 760 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 170W, a 105W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌352.7% HIGHER MSRP$249 MSRPvs$55 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 19.3 vs 87.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $55 MSRP).
- ❌161.5% higher power demand at 170W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 760 better than Radeon RX 560X (móvel)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 560X (móvel) make more sense than GeForce GTX 760?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 760 | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 13 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 18 FPS |
| high | 53 FPS | 10 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 7 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 14 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 4 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 760 | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 34 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 17 FPS | 8 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 7 FPS |
| ultra | 10 FPS | 5 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 760 | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 217 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 173 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 108 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 54 FPS | 52 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 760 | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 36 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 760 and Radeon RX 560X (móvel)

GeForce GTX 760
GeForce GTX 760
The GeForce GTX 760 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,813 points. Launch price was $249.

Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 11 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1275 MHz to 1202 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,800 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 760 scores 4,813 and the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) reaches 4,800 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760 is built on Kepler while the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,152 (GeForce GTX 760) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)). Raw compute: 2.378 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760) vs 2.611 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1033 MHz vs 1202 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,813 | 4,800 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1152+13% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.378 TFLOPS | 2.611 TFLOPS+10% |
| Boost Clock | 1033 MHz | 1202 MHz+16% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 96+50% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 256 KB+167% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 760 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce GTX 760 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 760 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 760 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 760) vs 112 GB/s (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)) — a 71.4% advantage for the GeForce GTX 760. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 760) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)) — the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s+71% | 112 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 760 draws 170W versus the Radeon RX 560X (móvel)'s 65W — a 89.4% difference. The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 760) vs 350W (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W | 65W-62% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 28.3 | 73.8+161% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 760 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) launched at $55. The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) costs 77.9% less ($194 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 19.3 (GeForce GTX 760) vs 87.3 (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)) — the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) offers 352.3% better value. The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $55-78% |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.3 | 87.3+352% |
| Codename | GK104 | Polaris 21 |
| Release | June 25 2013 | April 11 2018 |
| Ranking | #450 | #483 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












