GeForce GTX 760 vs Radeon RX 560X (móvel)

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 760

2013Core: 980 MHzBoost: 1033 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon RX 560X (móvel)

2018Core: 1275 MHzBoost: 1202 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 760

2013

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 352.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $249 MSRPvs$55 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 19.3 vs 87.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $55 MSRP).
  • 161.5% higher power demand at 170W vs 65W.

Radeon RX 560X (móvel)

2018

Why buy it

  • Costs $194 less on MSRP ($55 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
  • Delivers 351.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 87.3 vs 19.3 G3D/$ ($55 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
  • Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 760: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 760 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
  • Draws 65W instead of 170W, a 105W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 760 better than Radeon RX 560X (móvel)?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 4,813 vs 4,800 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer GeForce GTX 760 is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2018 generation instead of 2013, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with FSR Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 14nm process instead of 28nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GeForce GTX 760 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce GTX 760 is about 352.7% more expensive on MSRP at $249 MSRP versus $55 MSRP, and you are getting 0.3% higher G3D Mark. Radeon RX 560X (móvel) really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
When does Radeon RX 560X (móvel) make more sense than GeForce GTX 760?
Yes. Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (65W vs 170W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $55 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce GTX 760. The trade-off is that GeForce GTX 760 currently gives you 0.3% higher G3D Mark. Radeon RX 560X (móvel) still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce GTX 760Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
1080p
low100 FPS41 FPS
medium86 FPS27 FPS
high68 FPS20 FPS
ultra40 FPS13 FPS
1440p
low87 FPS29 FPS
medium77 FPS18 FPS
high53 FPS10 FPS
ultra31 FPS7 FPS
4K
low28 FPS14 FPS
medium26 FPS9 FPS
high17 FPS6 FPS
ultra15 FPS4 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce GTX 760Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
1080p
low137 FPS83 FPS
medium94 FPS54 FPS
high70 FPS41 FPS
ultra45 FPS23 FPS
1440p
low74 FPS40 FPS
medium47 FPS29 FPS
high34 FPS20 FPS
ultra24 FPS14 FPS
4K
low27 FPS10 FPS
medium17 FPS8 FPS
high13 FPS7 FPS
ultra10 FPS5 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce GTX 760Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
1080p
low217 FPS216 FPS
medium173 FPS173 FPS
high144 FPS144 FPS
ultra108 FPS108 FPS
1440p
low162 FPS162 FPS
medium130 FPS130 FPS
high108 FPS108 FPS
ultra81 FPS81 FPS
4K
low108 FPS108 FPS
medium87 FPS86 FPS
high72 FPS72 FPS
ultra54 FPS52 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce GTX 760Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
1080p
low181 FPS183 FPS
medium136 FPS143 FPS
high122 FPS116 FPS
ultra94 FPS96 FPS
1440p
low137 FPS143 FPS
medium104 FPS111 FPS
high94 FPS86 FPS
ultra67 FPS68 FPS
4K
low79 FPS77 FPS
medium57 FPS57 FPS
high47 FPS47 FPS
ultra31 FPS36 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 760 and Radeon RX 560X (móvel)

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 760

The GeForce GTX 760 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,813 points. Launch price was $249.

AMD

Radeon RX 560X (móvel)

The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 11 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1275 MHz to 1202 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,800 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 760 scores 4,813 and the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) reaches 4,800 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760 is built on Kepler while the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,152 (GeForce GTX 760) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)). Raw compute: 2.378 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760) vs 2.611 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1033 MHz vs 1202 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
G3D Mark Score
4,813
4,800
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
1152+13%
1024
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.378 TFLOPS
2.611 TFLOPS+10%
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
1202 MHz+16%
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
96+50%
64
L1 Cache
96 KB
256 KB+167%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 760 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce GTX 760 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 760 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 760 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 760) vs 112 GB/s (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)) — a 71.4% advantage for the GeForce GTX 760. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 760) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)) — the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s+71%
112 GB/s
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 760 draws 170W versus the Radeon RX 560X (móvel)'s 65W — a 89.4% difference. The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 760) vs 350W (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
TDP
170W
65W-62%
Recommended PSU
500W
350W-30%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
241mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
28.3
73.8+161%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 760 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) launched at $55. The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) costs 77.9% less ($194 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 19.3 (GeForce GTX 760) vs 87.3 (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)) — the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) offers 352.3% better value. The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GTX 760Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
MSRP
$249
$55-78%
Performance per Dollar
19.3
87.3+352%
Codename
GK104
Polaris 21
Release
June 25 2013
April 11 2018
Ranking
#450
#483