
GeForce GTX 760
Popular choices:

Radeon 860M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 760
2013Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 19.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌1033.3% higher power demand at 170W vs 15W.
Radeon 860M
2025Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 170W, a 155W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 19.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 760
2013Radeon 860M
2025Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 19.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 170W, a 155W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌1033.3% higher power demand at 170W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 19.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon 860M better than GeForce GTX 760?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 760 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 760 | Radeon 860M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 46 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 11 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 20 FPS |
| high | 53 FPS | 11 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 12 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 8 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 5 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 4 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 760 | Radeon 860M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 97 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 34 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 18 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 17 FPS | 14 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 10 FPS | 9 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 760 | Radeon 860M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 217 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 173 FPS | 174 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 108 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 54 FPS | 54 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 760 | Radeon 860M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 33 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 760 and Radeon 860M

GeForce GTX 760
GeForce GTX 760
The GeForce GTX 760 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,813 points. Launch price was $249.

Radeon 860M
Radeon 860M
The Radeon 860M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Marchar 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 600 MHz to 3000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,838 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 760 scores 4,813 and the Radeon 860M reaches 4,838 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760 is built on Kepler while the Radeon 860M uses RDNA 3.5, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,152 (GeForce GTX 760) vs 512 (Radeon 860M). Raw compute: 2.378 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760) vs 3.072 TFLOPS (Radeon 860M). Boost clocks: 1033 MHz vs 3000 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 | Radeon 860M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,813 | 4,838 |
| Architecture | Kepler | RDNA 3.5 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 1152+125% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.378 TFLOPS | 3.072 TFLOPS+29% |
| Boost Clock | 1033 MHz | 3000 MHz+190% |
| ROPs | 32+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 96+200% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB+50% | 64 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 760 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon 860M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 | Radeon 860M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 760 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 860M has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 760 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 760) vs 1 MB (Radeon 860M) — the Radeon 860M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 | Radeon 860M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 760 draws 170W versus the Radeon 860M's 15W — a 167.6% difference. The Radeon 860M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 760) vs 350W (Radeon 860M). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 | Radeon 860M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W | 15W-91% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 28.3 | 322.5+1040% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 860M is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 | Radeon 860M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | — |
| Codename | GK104 | Krackan Point |
| Release | June 25 2013 | Marchar 2025 |
| Ranking | #450 | #449 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












