
GeForce GTX 760
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1630
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 760
2013Why buy it
- ✅1.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌66% HIGHER MSRP$249 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 19.3 vs 33.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌126.7% higher power demand at 170W vs 75W.
- ❌66.2% longer card at 241mm vs 145mm.
GeForce GTX 1630
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 72.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.3 vs 19.3 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 760: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 760 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 170W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅Measures 145mm instead of 241mm, a 96mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 760 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
GeForce GTX 760
2013GeForce GTX 1630
2022Why buy it
- ✅1.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 72.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.3 vs 19.3 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 760: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 760 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 170W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅Measures 145mm instead of 241mm, a 96mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌66% HIGHER MSRP$249 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 19.3 vs 33.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌126.7% higher power demand at 170W vs 75W.
- ❌66.2% longer card at 241mm vs 145mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 760 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1630 better than GeForce GTX 760?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 760 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 760 | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 66 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 53 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 18 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 10 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 18 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 12 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 6 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 760 | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 124 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 45 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 32 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 17 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 28 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 760 | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 217 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 173 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 108 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 54 FPS | 48 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 760 | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 48 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 49 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 760 and GeForce GTX 1630

GeForce GTX 760
GeForce GTX 760
The GeForce GTX 760 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,813 points. Launch price was $249.

GeForce GTX 1630
GeForce GTX 1630
The GeForce GTX 1630 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2022. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1740 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,992 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 760 scores 4,813 and the GeForce GTX 1630 reaches 4,992 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760 is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 1630 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,152 (GeForce GTX 760) vs 512 (GeForce GTX 1630). Raw compute: 2.378 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760) vs 1.828 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1630). Boost clocks: 1033 MHz vs 1785 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,813 | 4,992+4% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Turing |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1152+125% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.378 TFLOPS+30% | 1.828 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1033 MHz | 1785 MHz+73% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 96+200% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 512 KB+433% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 760) vs 96 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1630) — a 100% advantage for the GeForce GTX 760. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 760) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1630) — the GeForce GTX 1630 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s+100% | 96 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 760) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce GTX 1630). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6+7% |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 760) vs NVENC 6th gen (GeForce GTX 1630). Decoder: NVDEC 1st gen vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264 (GeForce GTX 760) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1630).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st gen | NVENC 6th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st gen | NVDEC 4th gen |
| Codecs | H.264 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 760 draws 170W versus the GeForce GTX 1630's 75W — a 77.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 760) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1630). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs None. Card length: 241mm vs 145mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 60°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W | 75W-56% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 300W-40% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | None |
| Length | 241mm | 145mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 60°C-25% |
| Perf/Watt | 28.3 | 66.6+135% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 760 launched at $249 MSRP, while the GeForce GTX 1630 launched at $150. The GeForce GTX 1630 costs 39.8% less ($99 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 19.3 (GeForce GTX 760) vs 33.3 (GeForce GTX 1630) — the GeForce GTX 1630 offers 72.5% better value. The GeForce GTX 1630 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $150-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.3 | 33.3+73% |
| Codename | GK104 | TU117 |
| Release | June 25 2013 | June 28 2022 |
| Ranking | #450 | #444 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












