PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Xeon Platinum 8368

2021

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,381 less on MSRP ($7,214 MSRP vs $9,595 MSRP).
✅Delivers 30.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 12.8 vs 9.8 PassMark/$ ($7,214 MSRP vs $9,595 MSRP).
✅Draws 270W instead of 350W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No 3D V-Cache or similar L3 advantage, which matters in CPU-limited gaming (57 MB vs 300 MB).
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (20,000 vs 65,000).
❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Xeon Platinum 8570 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon Platinum 8570

2023

Why buy it

✅Massive L3 cache advantage with 300 MB vs 57 MB, which is a real win in CPU-limited gaming.
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
✅25% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.8 vs 12.8 PassMark/$ ($9,595 MSRP vs $7,214 MSRP).
❌29.6% higher power demand at 350W vs 270W.

Xeon Platinum 8368

2021

Xeon Platinum 8570

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,381 less on MSRP ($7,214 MSRP vs $9,595 MSRP).
✅Delivers 30.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 12.8 vs 9.8 PassMark/$ ($7,214 MSRP vs $9,595 MSRP).
✅Draws 270W instead of 350W, a 80W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Massive L3 cache advantage with 300 MB vs 57 MB, which is a real win in CPU-limited gaming.
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
✅25% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌No 3D V-Cache or similar L3 advantage, which matters in CPU-limited gaming (57 MB vs 300 MB).
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (20,000 vs 65,000).
❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Xeon Platinum 8570 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.8 vs 12.8 PassMark/$ ($9,595 MSRP vs $7,214 MSRP).
❌29.6% higher power demand at 350W vs 270W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Platinum 8570 better than Xeon Platinum 8368?

Yes. Xeon Platinum 8570 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 0.3% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 225% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 1.8% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Platinum 8570 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 0.3% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests. It also has a big cache advantage at 300 MB vs 57 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8570 is the better fit. You are getting 225% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 56 cores and 112 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 426.3% larger total L3 cache (300 MB vs 57 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Platinum 8570 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon Platinum 8368 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Xeon Platinum 8570 is 33.0% more expensive on MSRP at $9,595 MSRP versus $7,214 MSRP, and it gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon Platinum 8368 is also 30.6% better value on MSRP (12.8 vs 9.8 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Platinum 8570 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of LGA4189, 3D V-Cache and a much larger 300 MB L3 cache instead of 57 MB, and more multi-core headroom with 56 cores / 112 threads instead of 38/76. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Xeon Platinum 8368 Benchmark Check

Xeon Platinum 8570 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Xeon Platinum 8368	Xeon Platinum 8570
1080p
low	185 FPS	188 FPS
medium	149 FPS	165 FPS
high	120 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	94 FPS	106 FPS
1440p
low	154 FPS	155 FPS
medium	120 FPS	131 FPS
high	93 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	74 FPS	82 FPS
4K
low	72 FPS	70 FPS
medium	60 FPS	63 FPS
high	46 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	38 FPS	40 FPS

Open Xeon Platinum 8368 Open Xeon Platinum 8570

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Xeon Platinum 8368	Xeon Platinum 8570
1080p
low	412 FPS	282 FPS
medium	361 FPS	250 FPS
high	294 FPS	206 FPS
ultra	235 FPS	169 FPS
1440p
low	353 FPS	230 FPS
medium	314 FPS	208 FPS
high	264 FPS	177 FPS
ultra	203 FPS	141 FPS
4K
low	219 FPS	143 FPS
medium	198 FPS	131 FPS
high	167 FPS	119 FPS
ultra	135 FPS	99 FPS

Open Xeon Platinum 8368 Open Xeon Platinum 8570

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Xeon Platinum 8368	Xeon Platinum 8570
1080p
low	935 FPS	910 FPS
medium	817 FPS	838 FPS
high	766 FPS	791 FPS
ultra	680 FPS	698 FPS
1440p
low	746 FPS	782 FPS
medium	643 FPS	716 FPS
high	603 FPS	673 FPS
ultra	535 FPS	601 FPS
4K
low	479 FPS	528 FPS
medium	378 FPS	444 FPS
high	334 FPS	396 FPS
ultra	272 FPS	330 FPS

Open Xeon Platinum 8368 Open Xeon Platinum 8570

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Xeon Platinum 8368	Xeon Platinum 8570
1080p
low	911 FPS	969 FPS
medium	828 FPS	875 FPS
high	714 FPS	754 FPS
ultra	613 FPS	654 FPS
1440p
low	712 FPS	792 FPS
medium	625 FPS	691 FPS
high	537 FPS	593 FPS
ultra	460 FPS	510 FPS
4K
low	514 FPS	571 FPS
medium	459 FPS	514 FPS
high	403 FPS	454 FPS
ultra	351 FPS	391 FPS

Open Xeon Platinum 8368 Open Xeon Platinum 8570

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Platinum 8368 and Xeon Platinum 8570

Xeon Platinum 8368

The Xeon Platinum 8368 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-04-06. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 38 cores and 76 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 57 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 92,054 points. Launch price was $7,214.

Xeon Platinum 8570

The Xeon Platinum 8570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 56 cores and 112 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 300 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5 @ 5600 MT/s (1 DPC). Passmark benchmark score: 93,722 points. Launch price was $9,595.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon Platinum 8368 packs 38 cores / 76 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8570 offers 56 cores / 112 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8570 has 18 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8368 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8570 — a 16.2% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8570 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon Platinum 8368 uses the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8570 uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Platinum 8368 scores 92,054 against the Xeon Platinum 8570's 93,722 — a 1.8% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8570. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 20,000 vs 65,000 (105.9% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8570). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,961 vs 1,960, a 0.1% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8368 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 25,000 vs 18,960 (27.5% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8368). L3 cache: 57 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8368 vs 300 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8570.

Feature	Xeon Platinum 8368	Xeon Platinum 8570
Cores / Threads	38 / 76	56 / 112+47%
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz	4 GHz+18%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+14%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	57 MB (total)	300 MB (total)+426%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	10 nm	Intel 7 nm-30%
Architecture	Ice Lake-SP (2021)	Emerald Rapids (2023)
PassMark	92,054	93,722+2%
Cinebench R23 Multi	20,000	65,000+225%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,961	1,960
Geekbench 6 Multi	25,000+32%	18,960

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon Platinum 8368 uses the LGA4189 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8570 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8368 versus DDR5-5600 on the Xeon Platinum 8570 — the Xeon Platinum 8570 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8368 supports up to 6 TB of RAM compared to 4 TB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 64 (Xeon Platinum 8368) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8570) — the Xeon Platinum 8570 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621A (Xeon Platinum 8368) and Intel C741 (Xeon Platinum 8570).

Feature	Xeon Platinum 8368	Xeon Platinum 8570
Socket	LGA4189	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	DDR5-5600+25%
Max RAM Capacity	6 TB+50%	4 TB
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	64	80+25%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8368 targets Server, Xeon Platinum 8570 targets Server. Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8368 rivals EPYC 7543; Xeon Platinum 8570 rivals AMD EPYC 9554.

Feature	Xeon Platinum 8368	Xeon Platinum 8570
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Server	Server

💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon Platinum 8368 launched at $7214 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8570 debuted at $9595. On MSRP ($7214 vs $9595), the Xeon Platinum 8368 is $2381 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Platinum 8368 delivers 12.8 pts/$ vs 9.8 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8570 — making the Xeon Platinum 8368 the 26.6% better value option.