PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Xeon Platinum 8368

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 270W instead of 385W, a 115W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w9-3595X across 35 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (20,000 vs 130,000).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.8 vs 16.6 PassMark/$ ($7,214 MSRP vs $5,889 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Xeon w9-3595X moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon w9-3595X

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.0% higher average FPS across 35 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,325 less on MSRP ($5,889 MSRP vs $7,214 MSRP).
✅Delivers 29.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.6 vs 12.8 PassMark/$ ($5,889 MSRP vs $7,214 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
✅75% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌42.6% higher power demand at 385W vs 270W.

Xeon Platinum 8368

2021

Xeon w9-3595X

2024

Why buy it

✅Draws 270W instead of 385W, a 115W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.0% higher average FPS across 35 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,325 less on MSRP ($5,889 MSRP vs $7,214 MSRP).
✅Delivers 29.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.6 vs 12.8 PassMark/$ ($5,889 MSRP vs $7,214 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
✅75% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w9-3595X across 35 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (20,000 vs 130,000).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.8 vs 16.6 PassMark/$ ($7,214 MSRP vs $5,889 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Xeon w9-3595X moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌42.6% higher power demand at 385W vs 270W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon w9-3595X better than Xeon Platinum 8368?

Yes. Xeon w9-3595X is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 14.0% average FPS lead across 35 shared CPU game tests in our data, 550% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 6.0% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon w9-3595X is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 14.0% more average FPS across 35 shared CPU game tests. It also has a big cache advantage at 113 MB vs 57 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w9-3595X is the better fit. You are getting 550% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 60 cores and 120 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 97.4% larger total L3 cache (113 MB vs 57 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon w9-3595X is the smarter buy today. Xeon w9-3595X is $1,325 cheaper on MSRP at $5,889 MSRP versus $7,214 MSRP, and it gives you a 14.0% average FPS lead across 35 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 29.8% better value on MSRP (16.6 vs 12.8 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon w9-3595X is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2021), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of LGA4189, 3D V-Cache and a much larger 113 MB L3 cache instead of 57 MB, and more multi-core headroom with 60 cores / 120 threads instead of 38/76. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Xeon Platinum 8368 Benchmark Check

Xeon w9-3595X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Xeon Platinum 8368	Xeon w9-3595X
1080p
low	185 FPS	316 FPS
medium	149 FPS	306 FPS
high	120 FPS	246 FPS
ultra	94 FPS	207 FPS
1440p
low	154 FPS	274 FPS
medium	120 FPS	237 FPS
high	93 FPS	178 FPS
ultra	74 FPS	157 FPS
4K
low	72 FPS	186 FPS
medium	60 FPS	159 FPS
high	46 FPS	120 FPS
ultra	38 FPS	108 FPS

Open Xeon Platinum 8368 Open Xeon w9-3595X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Xeon Platinum 8368	Xeon w9-3595X
1080p
low	412 FPS	384 FPS
medium	361 FPS	332 FPS
high	294 FPS	270 FPS
ultra	235 FPS	236 FPS
1440p
low	353 FPS	308 FPS
medium	314 FPS	273 FPS
high	264 FPS	232 FPS
ultra	203 FPS	190 FPS
4K
low	219 FPS	181 FPS
medium	198 FPS	162 FPS
high	167 FPS	151 FPS
ultra	135 FPS	133 FPS

Open Xeon Platinum 8368 Open Xeon w9-3595X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Xeon Platinum 8368	Xeon w9-3595X
1080p
low	935 FPS	1025 FPS
medium	817 FPS	1086 FPS
high	766 FPS	1020 FPS
ultra	680 FPS	875 FPS
1440p
low	746 FPS	1009 FPS
medium	643 FPS	913 FPS
high	603 FPS	840 FPS
ultra	535 FPS	656 FPS
4K
low	479 FPS	605 FPS
medium	378 FPS	521 FPS
high	334 FPS	465 FPS
ultra	272 FPS	400 FPS

Open Xeon Platinum 8368 Open Xeon w9-3595X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Xeon Platinum 8368	Xeon w9-3595X
1080p
low	911 FPS	1147 FPS
medium	828 FPS	1015 FPS
high	714 FPS	901 FPS
ultra	613 FPS	802 FPS
1440p
low	712 FPS	930 FPS
medium	625 FPS	813 FPS
high	537 FPS	716 FPS
ultra	460 FPS	629 FPS
4K
low	514 FPS	679 FPS
medium	459 FPS	606 FPS
high	403 FPS	543 FPS
ultra	351 FPS	437 FPS

Open Xeon Platinum 8368 Open Xeon w9-3595X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Platinum 8368 and Xeon w9-3595X

Xeon Platinum 8368

The Xeon Platinum 8368 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-04-06. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 38 cores and 76 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 57 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 92,054 points. Launch price was $7,214.

Xeon w9-3595X

The Xeon w9-3595X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 60 cores and 120 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 112.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 385 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 97,534 points. Launch price was $5,889.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon Platinum 8368 packs 38 cores / 76 threads, while the Xeon w9-3595X offers 60 cores / 120 threads — the Xeon w9-3595X has 22 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8368 versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w9-3595X — a 34.1% clock advantage for the Xeon w9-3595X (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Xeon Platinum 8368 uses the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon w9-3595X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Platinum 8368 scores 92,054 against the Xeon w9-3595X's 97,534 — a 5.8% lead for the Xeon w9-3595X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 20,000 vs 130,000 (146.7% advantage for the Xeon w9-3595X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,961 vs 2,300, a 15.9% lead for the Xeon w9-3595X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 25,000 vs 17,118 (37.4% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8368). L3 cache: 57 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8368 vs 112.5 MB on the Xeon w9-3595X.

Feature	Xeon Platinum 8368	Xeon w9-3595X
Cores / Threads	38 / 76	60 / 120+58%
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz	4.8 GHz+41%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+20%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	57 MB (total)	112.5 MB+97%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	10 nm	Intel 7 nm-30%
Architecture	Ice Lake-SP (2021)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	92,054	97,534+6%
Cinebench R23 Multi	20,000	130,000+550%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,961	2,300+17%
Geekbench 6 Multi	25,000+46%	17,118

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon Platinum 8368 uses the LGA4189 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w9-3595X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8368 versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w9-3595X — the Xeon w9-3595X supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w9-3595X supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 199.4% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 64 (Xeon Platinum 8368) vs 112 (Xeon w9-3595X) — the Xeon w9-3595X offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621A (Xeon Platinum 8368) and W790 (Xeon w9-3595X).

Feature	Xeon Platinum 8368	Xeon w9-3595X
Socket	LGA4189	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	DDR5-4800+25%
Max RAM Capacity	6 TB+50%	4096 GB
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	64	112+75%

🔧

Advanced Features

Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8368) vs true (Xeon w9-3595X). Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8368 targets Server, Xeon w9-3595X targets High-end Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8368 rivals EPYC 7543; Xeon w9-3595X rivals Threadripper PRO 7985WX.

Feature	Xeon Platinum 8368	Xeon w9-3595X
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	true
Target Use	Server	High-end Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon Platinum 8368 launched at $7214 MSRP, while the Xeon w9-3595X debuted at $5889. On MSRP ($7214 vs $5889), the Xeon w9-3595X is $1325 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Platinum 8368 delivers 12.8 pts/$ vs 16.6 pts/$ for the Xeon w9-3595X — making the Xeon w9-3595X the 25.9% better value option.