
Xeon Platinum 8368
Popular choices:

Xeon Platinum 8470
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon Platinum 8368
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,145 less on MSRP ($7,214 MSRP vs $9,359 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 32.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 12.8 vs 9.6 PassMark/$ ($7,214 MSRP vs $9,359 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 270W instead of 350W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (57 MB vs 105 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Xeon Platinum 8470 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon Platinum 8470
2023Why buy it
- ✅+84.2% larger total L3 cache (105 MB vs 57 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (89,850 vs 92,054).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.6 vs 12.8 PassMark/$ ($9,359 MSRP vs $7,214 MSRP).
- ❌29.6% higher power demand at 350W vs 270W.
Xeon Platinum 8368
2021Xeon Platinum 8470
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,145 less on MSRP ($7,214 MSRP vs $9,359 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 32.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 12.8 vs 9.6 PassMark/$ ($7,214 MSRP vs $9,359 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 270W instead of 350W, a 80W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+84.2% larger total L3 cache (105 MB vs 57 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (57 MB vs 105 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Xeon Platinum 8470 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (89,850 vs 92,054).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.6 vs 12.8 PassMark/$ ($9,359 MSRP vs $7,214 MSRP).
- ❌29.6% higher power demand at 350W vs 270W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Platinum 8368 better than Xeon Platinum 8470?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon Platinum 8368 | Xeon Platinum 8470 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 172 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon Platinum 8368 | Xeon Platinum 8470 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 412 FPS | 282 FPS |
| medium | 361 FPS | 250 FPS |
| high | 294 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 235 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 353 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 208 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 203 FPS | 141 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 219 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 167 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 99 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon Platinum 8368 | Xeon Platinum 8470 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 935 FPS | 854 FPS |
| medium | 817 FPS | 773 FPS |
| high | 766 FPS | 738 FPS |
| ultra | 680 FPS | 649 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 760 FPS |
| medium | 643 FPS | 683 FPS |
| high | 603 FPS | 637 FPS |
| ultra | 535 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 505 FPS |
| medium | 378 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 334 FPS | 368 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 306 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon Platinum 8368 | Xeon Platinum 8470 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 911 FPS | 983 FPS |
| medium | 828 FPS | 885 FPS |
| high | 714 FPS | 765 FPS |
| ultra | 613 FPS | 662 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 712 FPS | 804 FPS |
| medium | 625 FPS | 700 FPS |
| high | 537 FPS | 603 FPS |
| ultra | 460 FPS | 516 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 514 FPS | 577 FPS |
| medium | 459 FPS | 518 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 459 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 397 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Platinum 8368 and Xeon Platinum 8470

Xeon Platinum 8368
Xeon Platinum 8368
The Xeon Platinum 8368 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-04-06. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 38 cores and 76 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 57 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 92,054 points. Launch price was $7,214.

Xeon Platinum 8470
Xeon Platinum 8470
The Xeon Platinum 8470 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 52 cores and 104 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 105 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 89,850 points. Launch price was $9,359.
Processing Power
The Xeon Platinum 8368 packs 38 cores / 76 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8470 offers 52 cores / 104 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8470 has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8368 versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8470 — a 11.1% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8470 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Xeon Platinum 8368 uses the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8470 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Platinum 8368 scores 92,054 against the Xeon Platinum 8470's 89,850 — a 2.4% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8368. L3 cache: 57 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8368 vs 105 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8470.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8368 | Xeon Platinum 8470 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 38 / 76 | 52 / 104+37% |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.8 GHz+12% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz+20% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 57 MB (total) | 105 MB+84% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 10 nm | Intel 7 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Ice Lake-SP (2021) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 92,054+2% | 89,850 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 20,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,961 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 25,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon Platinum 8368 uses the LGA4189 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8470 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8368 versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon Platinum 8470 — the Xeon Platinum 8470 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8368 supports up to 6 TB of RAM compared to 4 TB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 64 (Xeon Platinum 8368) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8470) — the Xeon Platinum 8470 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8368 | Xeon Platinum 8470 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4189 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-4800+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB+50% | 4 TB |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 64 | 80+25% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8368) vs VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT (Xeon Platinum 8470). Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8368 targets Server, Xeon Platinum 8470 targets Cloud Infrastructure. Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8368 rivals EPYC 7543; Xeon Platinum 8470 rivals EPYC 9534.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8368 | Xeon Platinum 8470 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT |
| Target Use | Server | Cloud Infrastructure |
Value Analysis
The Xeon Platinum 8368 launched at $7214 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8470 debuted at $9359. On MSRP ($7214 vs $9359), the Xeon Platinum 8368 is $2145 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Platinum 8368 delivers 12.8 pts/$ vs 9.6 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8470 — making the Xeon Platinum 8368 the 28.3% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8368 | Xeon Platinum 8470 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $7214-23% | $9359 |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.8+33% | 9.6 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













