PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +26.7% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $715 less on MSRP ($6,499 MSRP vs $7,214 MSRP).
✅Delivers 14.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 14.6 vs 12.8 PassMark/$ ($6,499 MSRP vs $7,214 MSRP).
✅100% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Platinum 8368

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 270W instead of 280W, a 10W reduction.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (20,000 vs 66,403).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.8 vs 14.6 PassMark/$ ($7,214 MSRP vs $6,499 MSRP).

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX

2022

Xeon Platinum 8368

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +26.7% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $715 less on MSRP ($6,499 MSRP vs $7,214 MSRP).
✅Delivers 14.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 14.6 vs 12.8 PassMark/$ ($6,499 MSRP vs $7,214 MSRP).
✅100% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Draws 270W instead of 280W, a 10W reduction.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (20,000 vs 66,403).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.8 vs 14.6 PassMark/$ ($7,214 MSRP vs $6,499 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX better than Xeon Platinum 8368?

Yes. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 26.7% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data, 232% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 2.9% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 26.7% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests. It also has a big cache advantage at 256 MB vs 57 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is the better fit. You are getting 232% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 349.1% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 57 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is the smarter buy today. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is $715 cheaper on MSRP at $6,499 MSRP versus $7,214 MSRP, and it gives you a 26.7% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 14.2% better value on MSRP (14.6 vs 12.8 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2021), 3D V-Cache and a much larger 256 MB L3 cache instead of 57 MB, and more multi-core headroom with 64 cores / 128 threads instead of 38/76. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX Benchmark Check

Xeon Platinum 8368 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX	Xeon Platinum 8368
1080p
low	205 FPS	185 FPS
medium	169 FPS	149 FPS
high	136 FPS	120 FPS
ultra	109 FPS	94 FPS
1440p
low	166 FPS	154 FPS
medium	131 FPS	120 FPS
high	104 FPS	93 FPS
ultra	86 FPS	74 FPS
4K
low	90 FPS	72 FPS
medium	77 FPS	60 FPS
high	60 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	49 FPS	38 FPS

Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX Open Xeon Platinum 8368

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX	Xeon Platinum 8368
1080p
low	760 FPS	412 FPS
medium	648 FPS	361 FPS
high	510 FPS	294 FPS
ultra	442 FPS	235 FPS
1440p
low	619 FPS	353 FPS
medium	540 FPS	314 FPS
high	444 FPS	264 FPS
ultra	361 FPS	203 FPS
4K
low	362 FPS	219 FPS
medium	318 FPS	198 FPS
high	286 FPS	167 FPS
ultra	253 FPS	135 FPS

Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX Open Xeon Platinum 8368

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX	Xeon Platinum 8368
1080p
low	920 FPS	935 FPS
medium	775 FPS	817 FPS
high	712 FPS	766 FPS
ultra	631 FPS	680 FPS
1440p
low	666 FPS	746 FPS
medium	560 FPS	643 FPS
high	509 FPS	603 FPS
ultra	446 FPS	535 FPS
4K
low	475 FPS	479 FPS
medium	382 FPS	378 FPS
high	347 FPS	334 FPS
ultra	279 FPS	272 FPS

Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX Open Xeon Platinum 8368

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX	Xeon Platinum 8368
1080p
low	1160 FPS	911 FPS
medium	1015 FPS	828 FPS
high	894 FPS	714 FPS
ultra	790 FPS	613 FPS
1440p
low	933 FPS	712 FPS
medium	809 FPS	625 FPS
high	709 FPS	537 FPS
ultra	613 FPS	460 FPS
4K
low	661 FPS	514 FPS
medium	588 FPS	459 FPS
high	522 FPS	403 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	351 FPS

Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX Open Xeon Platinum 8368

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and Xeon Platinum 8368

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-08. It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 94,737 points. Launch price was $6,499.

Xeon Platinum 8368

The Xeon Platinum 8368 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-04-06. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 38 cores and 76 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 57 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 92,054 points. Launch price was $7,214.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8368 offers 38 cores / 76 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX has 26 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8368 — a 27.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX uses the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8368 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX scores 94,737 against the Xeon Platinum 8368's 92,054 — a 2.9% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 66,403 vs 20,000 (107.4% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,500 vs 1,961, a 26.6% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8368 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 20,000 vs 25,000 (22.2% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8368). L3 cache: 256 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs 57 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8368.

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX	Xeon Platinum 8368
Cores / Threads	64 / 128+68%	38 / 76
Boost Clock	4.5 GHz+32%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.7 GHz+13%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB+349%	57 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	1 MB (per core)+100%
Process	7 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Chagall PRO (2022)	Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	94,737+3%	92,054
Cinebench R23 Multi	66,403+232%	20,000
Geekbench 6 Single	1,500	1,961+31%
Geekbench 6 Multi	20,000	25,000+25%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX uses the sWRX8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8368 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 198.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX) vs 64 (Xeon Platinum 8368) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX) and C621A (Xeon Platinum 8368).

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX	Xeon Platinum 8368
Socket	sWRX8	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	2048 GB	6 TB+200%
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+100%	64

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon Platinum 8368 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8368). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX targets Professional Workstation, Xeon Platinum 8368 targets Server. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX rivals Xeon w9-3495X; Xeon Platinum 8368 rivals EPYC 7543.

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX	Xeon Platinum 8368
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	true	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Professional Workstation	Server

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX launched at $6499 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8368 debuted at $7214. On MSRP ($6499 vs $7214), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is $715 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX delivers 14.6 pts/$ vs 12.8 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8368 — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX the 13.3% better value option.