
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
Popular choices:

Xeon 6747P
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +32.5% higher average FPS across 27 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 280W instead of 330W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (20,000 vs 45,000).
- ❌0% HIGHER MSRP$6,499 MSRPvs$6,497 MSRP
- ❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Xeon 6747P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.
Xeon 6747P
2025Why buy it
- ✅+125% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅Costs $2 less on MSRP ($6,497 MSRP vs $6,499 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX across 27 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌17.9% higher power demand at 330W vs 280W.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
2022Xeon 6747P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +32.5% higher average FPS across 27 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 280W instead of 330W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅+125% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅Costs $2 less on MSRP ($6,497 MSRP vs $6,499 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (20,000 vs 45,000).
- ❌0% HIGHER MSRP$6,499 MSRPvs$6,497 MSRP
- ❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Xeon 6747P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX across 27 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌17.9% higher power demand at 330W vs 280W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon 6747P better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX | Xeon 6747P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 205 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 169 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 136 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX | Xeon 6747P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 760 FPS | 520 FPS |
| medium | 648 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 510 FPS | 376 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 309 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 619 FPS | 425 FPS |
| medium | 540 FPS | 383 FPS |
| high | 444 FPS | 321 FPS |
| ultra | 361 FPS | 256 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 362 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 176 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX | Xeon 6747P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 920 FPS | 849 FPS |
| medium | 775 FPS | 768 FPS |
| high | 712 FPS | 730 FPS |
| ultra | 631 FPS | 641 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 666 FPS | 737 FPS |
| medium | 560 FPS | 662 FPS |
| high | 509 FPS | 626 FPS |
| ultra | 446 FPS | 558 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 475 FPS | 493 FPS |
| medium | 382 FPS | 402 FPS |
| high | 347 FPS | 364 FPS |
| ultra | 279 FPS | 303 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX | Xeon 6747P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1160 FPS | 1034 FPS |
| medium | 1015 FPS | 916 FPS |
| high | 894 FPS | 789 FPS |
| ultra | 790 FPS | 670 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 933 FPS | 848 FPS |
| medium | 809 FPS | 727 FPS |
| high | 709 FPS | 623 FPS |
| ultra | 613 FPS | 525 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 661 FPS | 613 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 538 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 474 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 403 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and Xeon 6747P


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-08. It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 94,737 points. Launch price was $6,499.

Xeon 6747P
Xeon 6747P
The Xeon 6747P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 288 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 330 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s), MRDIMM(8800MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 101,685 points. Launch price was $6,497.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Xeon 6747P offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon 6747P — a 14.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX uses the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon 6747P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX scores 94,737 against the Xeon 6747P's 101,685 — a 7.1% lead for the Xeon 6747P. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,500 vs 2,000, a 28.6% lead for the Xeon 6747P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 20,000 vs 45,000 (76.9% advantage for the Xeon 6747P). L3 cache: 256 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs 288 MB (total) on the Xeon 6747P.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX | Xeon 6747P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128+33% | 48 / 96 |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+15% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB | 288 MB (total)+13% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm | Intel 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Chagall PRO (2022) | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 94,737 | 101,685+7% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 66,403 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,500 | 2,000+33% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 20,000 | 45,000+125% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX uses the sWRX8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6747P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX versus DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6747P — the Xeon 6747P supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6747P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX) vs 88 (Xeon 6747P) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX) and C741 (Xeon 6747P).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX | Xeon 6747P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sWRX8 | LGA4710 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-6400+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 GB | 4096 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+45% | 88 |
Advanced Features
Only the Xeon 6747P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6747P). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX targets Professional Workstation, Xeon 6747P targets High Performance Server. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX rivals Xeon w9-3495X; Xeon 6747P rivals EPYC 9555.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX | Xeon 6747P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Professional Workstation | High Performance Server |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX launched at $6499 MSRP, while the Xeon 6747P debuted at $6497. On MSRP ($6499 vs $6497), the Xeon 6747P is $2 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX delivers 14.6 pts/$ vs 15.7 pts/$ for the Xeon 6747P — making the Xeon 6747P the 7.1% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX | Xeon 6747P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6499 | $6497 |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.6 | 15.7+8% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












