EPYC 9754 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX

AMD

EPYC 9754

128 Cores256 Thrd360 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2023

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX

64 Cores128 Thrd280 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2022

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9754

2023

Why buy it

  • +57.5% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
  • Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.3 vs 14.6 PassMark/$ ($11,900 MSRP vs $6,499 MSRP).
  • 28.6% higher power demand at 360W vs 280W.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX

2022

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +58.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $5,401 less on MSRP ($6,499 MSRP vs $11,900 MSRP).
  • Delivers 76.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 14.6 vs 8.3 PassMark/$ ($6,499 MSRP vs $11,900 MSRP).
  • Draws 280W instead of 360W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (66,403 vs 104,584).
  • Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while EPYC 9754 moves to SP5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX better than EPYC 9754?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is ahead with a 58.9% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9754 pulls ahead with 57.5% better Cinebench R23 multi-core.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9754 is the better fit. You are getting 57.5% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 128 cores and 256 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is the smarter buy today. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is $5,401 cheaper on MSRP at $6,499 MSRP versus $11,900 MSRP, and it gives you a 58.9% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that EPYC 9754 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 57.5% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. It is also 76.2% better value on MSRP (14.6 vs 8.3 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9754 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022), a healthier platform with SP5 and DDR5 instead of sWRX8, and more multi-core headroom with 128 cores / 256 threads instead of 64/128. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetEPYC 9754Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
1080p
low163 FPS205 FPS
medium134 FPS169 FPS
high113 FPS136 FPS
ultra89 FPS109 FPS
1440p
low143 FPS166 FPS
medium114 FPS131 FPS
high90 FPS104 FPS
ultra72 FPS86 FPS
4K
low68 FPS90 FPS
medium58 FPS77 FPS
high45 FPS60 FPS
ultra37 FPS49 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetEPYC 9754Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
1080p
low238 FPS760 FPS
medium211 FPS648 FPS
high174 FPS510 FPS
ultra138 FPS442 FPS
1440p
low195 FPS619 FPS
medium177 FPS540 FPS
high151 FPS444 FPS
ultra116 FPS361 FPS
4K
low121 FPS362 FPS
medium112 FPS318 FPS
high97 FPS286 FPS
ultra79 FPS253 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetEPYC 9754Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
1080p
low650 FPS920 FPS
medium541 FPS775 FPS
high481 FPS712 FPS
ultra422 FPS631 FPS
1440p
low503 FPS666 FPS
medium418 FPS560 FPS
high365 FPS509 FPS
ultra318 FPS446 FPS
4K
low371 FPS475 FPS
medium289 FPS382 FPS
high246 FPS347 FPS
ultra199 FPS279 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetEPYC 9754Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
1080p
low876 FPS1160 FPS
medium793 FPS1015 FPS
high682 FPS894 FPS
ultra592 FPS790 FPS
1440p
low695 FPS933 FPS
medium602 FPS809 FPS
high515 FPS709 FPS
ultra435 FPS613 FPS
4K
low495 FPS661 FPS
medium441 FPS588 FPS
high387 FPS522 FPS
ultra330 FPS437 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9754 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX

AMD

EPYC 9754

The EPYC 9754 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Bergamo (2023) architecture. It features 128 cores and 256 threads. Base frequency is 2.25 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 98,450 points. Launch price was $11,900.

AMD

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-08. It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 94,737 points. Launch price was $6,499.

Processing Power

The EPYC 9754 packs 128 cores / 256 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the EPYC 9754 has 64 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the EPYC 9754 versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX — a 36.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX (base: 2.25 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The EPYC 9754 uses the Bergamo (2023) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX uses Chagall PRO (2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9754 scores 98,450 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX's 94,737 — a 3.8% lead for the EPYC 9754. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 104,584 vs 66,403 (44.7% advantage for the EPYC 9754). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,634 vs 1,500, a 8.6% lead for the EPYC 9754 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 16,825 vs 20,000 (17.2% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9754 vs 256 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX.

FeatureEPYC 9754Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
Cores / Threads
128 / 256+100%
64 / 128
Boost Clock
3.1 GHz
4.5 GHz+45%
Base Clock
2.25 GHz
2.7 GHz+20%
L3 Cache
256 MB (total)
256 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)+100%
512K (per core)
Process
5 nm-29%
7 nm
Architecture
Bergamo (2023)
Chagall PRO (2022)
PassMark
98,450+4%
94,737
Cinebench R23 Multi
104,584+57%
66,403
Geekbench 6 Single
1,634+9%
1,500
Geekbench 6 Multi
16,825
20,000+19%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9754 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9754 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX — the EPYC 9754 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB 198.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9754) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9754) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX).

FeatureEPYC 9754Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
Socket
SP5
sWRX8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800+25%
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
6 TB+200%
2048 GB
RAM Channels
12+50%
8
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128
128
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9754) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX). Primary use case: EPYC 9754 targets Data Center / Cloud Native, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 9754 rivals Xeon 6780E; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX rivals Xeon w9-3495X.

FeatureEPYC 9754Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
Integrated GPU
No
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V, SEV-SNP
true
Target Use
Data Center / Cloud Native
Professional Workstation
💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9754 launched at $11900 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX debuted at $6499. On MSRP ($11900 vs $6499), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is $5401 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9754 delivers 8.3 pts/$ vs 14.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX the 55.2% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 9754Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
MSRP
$11900
$6499-45%
Performance per Dollar
8.3
14.6+76%
Release Date
2023
2022