
EPYC 9754
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 9754
2023Why buy it
- ✅+57.5% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.3 vs 14.6 PassMark/$ ($11,900 MSRP vs $6,499 MSRP).
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 360W vs 280W.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +58.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $5,401 less on MSRP ($6,499 MSRP vs $11,900 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 76.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 14.6 vs 8.3 PassMark/$ ($6,499 MSRP vs $11,900 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 280W instead of 360W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (66,403 vs 104,584).
- ❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while EPYC 9754 moves to SP5 and DDR5.
EPYC 9754
2023Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
2022Why buy it
- ✅+57.5% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +58.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $5,401 less on MSRP ($6,499 MSRP vs $11,900 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 76.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 14.6 vs 8.3 PassMark/$ ($6,499 MSRP vs $11,900 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 280W instead of 360W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.3 vs 14.6 PassMark/$ ($11,900 MSRP vs $6,499 MSRP).
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 360W vs 280W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (66,403 vs 104,584).
- ❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while EPYC 9754 moves to SP5 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX better than EPYC 9754?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 9754 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 205 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 169 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 90 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 49 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 9754 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 238 FPS | 760 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 648 FPS |
| high | 174 FPS | 510 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 442 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 195 FPS | 619 FPS |
| medium | 177 FPS | 540 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 444 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 361 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 121 FPS | 362 FPS |
| medium | 112 FPS | 318 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 253 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 9754 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 650 FPS | 920 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 775 FPS |
| high | 481 FPS | 712 FPS |
| ultra | 422 FPS | 631 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 503 FPS | 666 FPS |
| medium | 418 FPS | 560 FPS |
| high | 365 FPS | 509 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 446 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 371 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 289 FPS | 382 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 347 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 279 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 9754 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 876 FPS | 1160 FPS |
| medium | 793 FPS | 1015 FPS |
| high | 682 FPS | 894 FPS |
| ultra | 592 FPS | 790 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 695 FPS | 933 FPS |
| medium | 602 FPS | 809 FPS |
| high | 515 FPS | 709 FPS |
| ultra | 435 FPS | 613 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 495 FPS | 661 FPS |
| medium | 441 FPS | 588 FPS |
| high | 387 FPS | 522 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9754 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX

EPYC 9754
EPYC 9754
The EPYC 9754 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Bergamo (2023) architecture. It features 128 cores and 256 threads. Base frequency is 2.25 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 98,450 points. Launch price was $11,900.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-08. It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 94,737 points. Launch price was $6,499.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9754 packs 128 cores / 256 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the EPYC 9754 has 64 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the EPYC 9754 versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX — a 36.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX (base: 2.25 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The EPYC 9754 uses the Bergamo (2023) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX uses Chagall PRO (2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9754 scores 98,450 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX's 94,737 — a 3.8% lead for the EPYC 9754. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 104,584 vs 66,403 (44.7% advantage for the EPYC 9754). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,634 vs 1,500, a 8.6% lead for the EPYC 9754 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 16,825 vs 20,000 (17.2% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9754 vs 256 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX.
| Feature | EPYC 9754 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 128 / 256+100% | 64 / 128 |
| Boost Clock | 3.1 GHz | 4.5 GHz+45% |
| Base Clock | 2.25 GHz | 2.7 GHz+20% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 256 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Bergamo (2023) | Chagall PRO (2022) |
| PassMark | 98,450+4% | 94,737 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 104,584+57% | 66,403 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,634+9% | 1,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 16,825 | 20,000+19% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9754 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9754 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX — the EPYC 9754 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 198.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9754) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9754) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX).
| Feature | EPYC 9754 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | sWRX8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB+200% | 2048 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9754) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX). Primary use case: EPYC 9754 targets Data Center / Cloud Native, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 9754 rivals Xeon 6780E; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX rivals Xeon w9-3495X.
| Feature | EPYC 9754 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | true |
| Target Use | Data Center / Cloud Native | Professional Workstation |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9754 launched at $11900 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX debuted at $6499. On MSRP ($11900 vs $6499), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is $5401 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9754 delivers 8.3 pts/$ vs 14.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX the 55.2% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9754 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $11900 | $6499-45% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.3 | 14.6+76% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












