
EPYC 4584PX
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6421N
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 4584PX
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +33.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $851 less on MSRP ($1,517 MSRP vs $2,368 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 59.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 39.7 vs 24.8 PassMark/$ ($1,517 MSRP vs $2,368 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 185W, a 65W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics, while Xeon Gold 6421N needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Xeon Gold 6421N
2023Why buy it
- ✅185.7% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4584PX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (58,797 vs 60,169).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.8 vs 39.7 PassMark/$ ($2,368 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
- ❌54.2% higher power demand at 185W vs 120W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4584PX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
EPYC 4584PX
2024Xeon Gold 6421N
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +33.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $851 less on MSRP ($1,517 MSRP vs $2,368 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 59.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 39.7 vs 24.8 PassMark/$ ($1,517 MSRP vs $2,368 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 185W, a 65W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics, while Xeon Gold 6421N needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅185.7% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4584PX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (58,797 vs 60,169).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.8 vs 39.7 PassMark/$ ($2,368 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
- ❌54.2% higher power demand at 185W vs 120W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4584PX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4584PX better than Xeon Gold 6421N?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 4584PX | Xeon Gold 6421N |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 219 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 274 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 4584PX | Xeon Gold 6421N |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 701 FPS | 239 FPS |
| medium | 599 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 444 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 143 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 574 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 511 FPS | 182 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 312 FPS | 122 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 291 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 256 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 83 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 4584PX | Xeon Gold 6421N |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1025 FPS | 956 FPS |
| medium | 1166 FPS | 837 FPS |
| high | 1102 FPS | 793 FPS |
| ultra | 875 FPS | 705 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 972 FPS | 774 FPS |
| medium | 879 FPS | 668 FPS |
| high | 806 FPS | 623 FPS |
| ultra | 656 FPS | 555 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 597 FPS | 495 FPS |
| medium | 519 FPS | 391 FPS |
| high | 466 FPS | 342 FPS |
| ultra | 394 FPS | 279 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 4584PX | Xeon Gold 6421N |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1303 FPS | 923 FPS |
| medium | 1015 FPS | 832 FPS |
| high | 993 FPS | 717 FPS |
| ultra | 865 FPS | 619 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 1035 FPS | 715 FPS |
| medium | 897 FPS | 627 FPS |
| high | 772 FPS | 538 FPS |
| ultra | 647 FPS | 460 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 759 FPS | 516 FPS |
| medium | 662 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 577 FPS | 404 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 349 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 4584PX and Xeon Gold 6421N

EPYC 4584PX
EPYC 4584PX
The EPYC 4584PX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 60,169 points. Launch price was $699.

Xeon Gold 6421N
Xeon Gold 6421N
The Xeon Gold 6421N is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 58,797 points. Launch price was $2,368.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4584PX packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6421N offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Gold 6421N has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the EPYC 4584PX versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6421N — a 45.2% clock advantage for the EPYC 4584PX (base: 4.2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The EPYC 4584PX uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6421N uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4584PX scores 60,169 against the Xeon Gold 6421N's 58,797 — a 2.3% lead for the EPYC 4584PX. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 4584PX vs 60 MB on the Xeon Gold 6421N.
| Feature | EPYC 4584PX | Xeon Gold 6421N |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 32 / 64+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5.7 GHz+58% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.2 GHz+133% | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+113% | 60 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023−2025) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 60,169+2% | 58,797 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4584PX uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6421N uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5200 on the EPYC 4584PX versus 4800 on the Xeon Gold 6421N — the EPYC 4584PX supports 8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6421N supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 256 — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4584PX) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 6421N). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4584PX) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 6421N) — the Xeon Gold 6421N offers 52 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4584PX) and C741 (Xeon Gold 6421N).
| Feature | EPYC 4584PX | Xeon Gold 6421N |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 5200+8% | 4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 | 4096+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 80+186% |
Advanced Features
Only the EPYC 4584PX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4584PX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6421N). The EPYC 4584PX includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon Gold 6421N requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 4584PX rivals Ryzen 9 7950X; Xeon Gold 6421N rivals EPYC 9354.
| Feature | EPYC 4584PX | Xeon Gold 6421N |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 4584PX launched at $1517 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 6421N debuted at $2368. On MSRP ($1517 vs $2368), the EPYC 4584PX is $851 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4584PX delivers 39.7 pts/$ vs 24.8 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6421N — making the EPYC 4584PX the 46% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4584PX | Xeon Gold 6421N |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1517-36% | $2368 |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.7+60% | 24.8 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













