
EPYC 4584PX
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 5520+
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 4584PX
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +45.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 205W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics, while Xeon Gold 5520+ needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (60,169 vs 61,227).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 39.7 vs 56.5 PassMark/$ ($1,517 MSRP vs $1,083 MSRP).
Xeon Gold 5520+
2023Why buy it
- ✅+1.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $434 less on MSRP ($1,083 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 42.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 56.5 vs 39.7 PassMark/$ ($1,083 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
- ✅185.7% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4584PX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌70.8% higher power demand at 205W vs 120W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4584PX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
EPYC 4584PX
2024Xeon Gold 5520+
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +45.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 205W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics, while Xeon Gold 5520+ needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+1.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $434 less on MSRP ($1,083 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 42.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 56.5 vs 39.7 PassMark/$ ($1,083 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
- ✅185.7% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (60,169 vs 61,227).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 39.7 vs 56.5 PassMark/$ ($1,517 MSRP vs $1,083 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4584PX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌70.8% higher power demand at 205W vs 120W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4584PX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4584PX better than Xeon Gold 5520+?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 4584PX | Xeon Gold 5520+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 219 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 274 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 4584PX | Xeon Gold 5520+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 701 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 599 FPS | 238 FPS |
| high | 444 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 164 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 574 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 511 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 312 FPS | 140 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 291 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 256 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 98 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 4584PX | Xeon Gold 5520+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1025 FPS | 875 FPS |
| medium | 1166 FPS | 792 FPS |
| high | 1102 FPS | 748 FPS |
| ultra | 875 FPS | 658 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 972 FPS | 749 FPS |
| medium | 879 FPS | 674 FPS |
| high | 806 FPS | 633 FPS |
| ultra | 656 FPS | 564 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 597 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 519 FPS | 425 FPS |
| high | 466 FPS | 379 FPS |
| ultra | 394 FPS | 316 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 4584PX | Xeon Gold 5520+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1303 FPS | 935 FPS |
| medium | 1015 FPS | 842 FPS |
| high | 993 FPS | 728 FPS |
| ultra | 865 FPS | 632 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 1035 FPS | 768 FPS |
| medium | 897 FPS | 674 FPS |
| high | 772 FPS | 579 FPS |
| ultra | 647 FPS | 498 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 759 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 662 FPS | 504 FPS |
| high | 577 FPS | 445 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 383 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 4584PX and Xeon Gold 5520+

EPYC 4584PX
EPYC 4584PX
The EPYC 4584PX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 60,169 points. Launch price was $699.

Xeon Gold 5520+
Xeon Gold 5520+
The Xeon Gold 5520+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 52.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 61,227 points. Launch price was $1,640.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4584PX packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5520+ offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon Gold 5520+ has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the EPYC 4584PX versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5520+ — a 35.1% clock advantage for the EPYC 4584PX (base: 4.2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The EPYC 4584PX uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5520+ uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4584PX scores 60,169 against the Xeon Gold 5520+'s 61,227 — a 1.7% lead for the Xeon Gold 5520+. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 4584PX vs 52.5 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 5520+.
| Feature | EPYC 4584PX | Xeon Gold 5520+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 28 / 56+75% |
| Boost Clock | 5.7 GHz+43% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.2 GHz+91% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+144% | 52.5 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 5 nm-50% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023−2025) | Emerald Rapids (2023) |
| PassMark | 60,169 | 61,227+2% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,600 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 25,000 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4584PX uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5520+ uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5200 on the EPYC 4584PX versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon Gold 5520+ — the EPYC 4584PX supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 5520+ supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 256 — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4584PX) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 5520+). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4584PX) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 5520+) — the Xeon Gold 5520+ offers 52 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4584PX) and C741 (Xeon Gold 5520+).
| Feature | EPYC 4584PX | Xeon Gold 5520+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 5200+103900% | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 | 4096 GB+1677721500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 80+186% |
Advanced Features
Only the EPYC 4584PX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4584PX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 5520+). The EPYC 4584PX includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon Gold 5520+ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon Gold 5520+ targets Enterprise Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 4584PX rivals Ryzen 9 7950X; Xeon Gold 5520+ rivals EPYC 9354.
| Feature | EPYC 4584PX | Xeon Gold 5520+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Enterprise Server |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 4584PX launched at $1517 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 5520+ debuted at $1083. On MSRP ($1517 vs $1083), the Xeon Gold 5520+ is $434 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4584PX delivers 39.7 pts/$ vs 56.5 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 5520+ — making the Xeon Gold 5520+ the 35.1% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4584PX | Xeon Gold 5520+ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1517 | $1083-29% |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.7 | 56.5+42% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













