
EPYC 4584PX
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 5512U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 4584PX
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +48.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 185W, a 65W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics, while Xeon Gold 5512U needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (60,169 vs 60,367).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 39.7 vs 49.1 PassMark/$ ($1,517 MSRP vs $1,230 MSRP).
Xeon Gold 5512U
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $287 less on MSRP ($1,230 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 23.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 49.1 vs 39.7 PassMark/$ ($1,230 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
- ✅185.7% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4584PX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌54.2% higher power demand at 185W vs 120W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4584PX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
EPYC 4584PX
2024Xeon Gold 5512U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +48.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 185W, a 65W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics, while Xeon Gold 5512U needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $287 less on MSRP ($1,230 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 23.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 49.1 vs 39.7 PassMark/$ ($1,230 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
- ✅185.7% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (60,169 vs 60,367).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 39.7 vs 49.1 PassMark/$ ($1,517 MSRP vs $1,230 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4584PX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌54.2% higher power demand at 185W vs 120W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4584PX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4584PX better than Xeon Gold 5512U?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 4584PX | Xeon Gold 5512U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 219 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 274 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 4584PX | Xeon Gold 5512U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 701 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 599 FPS | 241 FPS |
| high | 444 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 166 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 574 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 511 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 312 FPS | 140 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 291 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 256 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 98 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 4584PX | Xeon Gold 5512U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1025 FPS | 777 FPS |
| medium | 1166 FPS | 691 FPS |
| high | 1102 FPS | 657 FPS |
| ultra | 875 FPS | 581 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 972 FPS | 672 FPS |
| medium | 879 FPS | 594 FPS |
| high | 806 FPS | 562 FPS |
| ultra | 656 FPS | 503 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 597 FPS | 453 FPS |
| medium | 519 FPS | 370 FPS |
| high | 466 FPS | 335 FPS |
| ultra | 394 FPS | 279 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 4584PX | Xeon Gold 5512U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1303 FPS | 940 FPS |
| medium | 1015 FPS | 841 FPS |
| high | 993 FPS | 726 FPS |
| ultra | 865 FPS | 622 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 1035 FPS | 762 FPS |
| medium | 897 FPS | 666 FPS |
| high | 772 FPS | 572 FPS |
| ultra | 647 FPS | 484 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 759 FPS | 550 FPS |
| medium | 662 FPS | 493 FPS |
| high | 577 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 372 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 4584PX and Xeon Gold 5512U

EPYC 4584PX
EPYC 4584PX
The EPYC 4584PX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 60,169 points. Launch price was $699.

Xeon Gold 5512U
Xeon Gold 5512U
The Xeon Gold 5512U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 52.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 60,367 points. Launch price was $1,230.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4584PX packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5512U offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon Gold 5512U has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the EPYC 4584PX versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5512U — a 42.6% clock advantage for the EPYC 4584PX (base: 4.2 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The EPYC 4584PX uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5512U uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4584PX scores 60,169 against the Xeon Gold 5512U's 60,367 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon Gold 5512U. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 4584PX vs 52.5 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 5512U.
| Feature | EPYC 4584PX | Xeon Gold 5512U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 28 / 56+75% |
| Boost Clock | 5.7 GHz+54% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.2 GHz+100% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+144% | 52.5 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023−2025) | Emerald Rapids (2023) |
| PassMark | 60,169 | 60,367 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4584PX uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5512U uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5200 on the EPYC 4584PX versus 4800 on the Xeon Gold 5512U — the EPYC 4584PX supports 8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 5512U supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 256 — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4584PX) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 5512U). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4584PX) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 5512U) — the Xeon Gold 5512U offers 52 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4584PX) and C741 (Xeon Gold 5512U).
| Feature | EPYC 4584PX | Xeon Gold 5512U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 5200+8% | 4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 | 4096+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 80+186% |
Advanced Features
Only the EPYC 4584PX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4584PX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 5512U). The EPYC 4584PX includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon Gold 5512U requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 4584PX rivals Ryzen 9 7950X; Xeon Gold 5512U rivals EPYC 9354.
| Feature | EPYC 4584PX | Xeon Gold 5512U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 4584PX launched at $1517 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 5512U debuted at $1230. On MSRP ($1517 vs $1230), the Xeon Gold 5512U is $287 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4584PX delivers 39.7 pts/$ vs 49.1 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 5512U — making the Xeon Gold 5512U the 21.2% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4584PX | Xeon Gold 5512U |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1517 | $1230-19% |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.7 | 49.1+24% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













