
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Popular choices:

Tesla T4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,721 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $1,880 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1086.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 64.1 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $1,880 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌42.9% higher power demand at 100W vs 70W.
- ❌36.3% longer card at 229mm vs 168mm.
Tesla T4
2018Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 100W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 229mm, a 61mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌1082.4% HIGHER MSRP$1,880 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 64.1 G3D/$ ($1,880 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
2019Tesla T4
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,721 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $1,880 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1086.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 64.1 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $1,880 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 100W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 229mm, a 61mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌42.9% higher power demand at 100W vs 70W.
- ❌36.3% longer card at 229mm vs 168mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌1082.4% HIGHER MSRP$1,880 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 64.1 G3D/$ ($1,880 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER better than Tesla T4?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Tesla T4 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 165 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 43 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 41 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 30 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 27 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 39 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 379 FPS | 457 FPS |
| medium | 333 FPS | 366 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 205 FPS | 228 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 343 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 274 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 228 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 228 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 183 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 114 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 307 FPS |
| medium | 218 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 195 FPS | 220 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 206 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 67 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and Tesla T4

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 22 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,186 points.

Tesla T4
Tesla T4
The Tesla T4 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 585 MHz to 1590 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,153 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER scores 10,186 and the Tesla T4 reaches 10,153 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is built on Turing while the Tesla T4 uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 2,560 (Tesla T4). Raw compute: 4.416 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 8.141 TFLOPS (Tesla T4). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1590 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,186 | 10,153 |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 2560+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.416 TFLOPS | 8.141 TFLOPS+84% |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz+8% | 1590 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 160+100% |
| L1 Cache | 1.3 MB | 2.5 MB+92% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Tesla T4 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla T4 has 8 GB. The Tesla T4 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 4 MB (Tesla T4) — the Tesla T4 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 12 Ultimate (Tesla T4). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs NVENC (Turing) (Tesla T4). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 (Tesla T4).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC (Turing) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER draws 100W versus the Tesla T4's 70W — a 35.3% difference. The Tesla T4 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 500W (Tesla T4). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 76°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 70W-30% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 168mm |
| Height | 111mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-1% | 76°C |
| Perf/Watt | 101.9 | 145.0+42% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER launched at $159 MSRP, while the Tesla T4 launched at $1880. The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER costs 91.5% less ($1721 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 64.1 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 5.4 (Tesla T4) — the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER offers 1087% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $159-92% | $1880 |
| Performance per Dollar | 64.1+1087% | 5.4 |
| Codename | TU116 | TU104 |
| Release | November 22 2019 | September 13 2018 |
| Ranking | #258 | #260 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











