
Ryzen 5 2600E
Popular choices:

Ryzen Z2 Go
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 2600E
2018Why buy it
- ✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2150% higher power demand at 45W vs 2W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen Z2 Go can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen Z2 Go
2025Why buy it
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 45W, a 43W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while Ryzen 5 2600E needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,188 vs 12,346).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
Ryzen 5 2600E
2018Ryzen Z2 Go
2025Why buy it
- ✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 45W, a 43W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while Ryzen 5 2600E needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌2150% higher power demand at 45W vs 2W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen Z2 Go can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,188 vs 12,346).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Z2 Go better than Ryzen 5 2600E?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 2600E | Ryzen Z2 Go |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 176 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 2600E | Ryzen Z2 Go |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 252 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 219 FPS | 241 FPS |
| high | 195 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 184 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 227 FPS | 249 FPS |
| medium | 199 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 177 FPS | 194 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 163 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 178 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 172 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 119 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 2600E | Ryzen Z2 Go |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 305 FPS |
| medium | 309 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 309 FPS | 305 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 305 FPS |
| medium | 309 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 309 FPS | 305 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 305 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 253 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 220 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 2600E | Ryzen Z2 Go |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 305 FPS |
| medium | 309 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 309 FPS | 305 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 305 FPS |
| medium | 309 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 309 FPS | 305 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 305 FPS |
| medium | 309 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 309 FPS | 305 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 2600E and Ryzen Z2 Go


Ryzen 5 2600E
Ryzen 5 2600E
The Ryzen 5 2600E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 12,346 points. Launch price was $149.


Ryzen Z2 Go
Ryzen Z2 Go
The Ryzen Z2 Go is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Rembrandt R (2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 6 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB + 8 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 12,188 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 2600E packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen Z2 Go offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Ryzen 5 2600E has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 2600E versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen Z2 Go — a 7.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen Z2 Go (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 5 2600E uses the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture (12 nm), while the Ryzen Z2 Go uses Rembrandt R (2025) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 2600E scores 12,346 against the Ryzen Z2 Go's 12,188 — a 1.3% lead for the Ryzen 5 2600E. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 2600E vs 8 MB on the Ryzen Z2 Go.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 2600E | Ryzen Z2 Go |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+50% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz | 4.3 GHz+7% |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz+3% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total)+100% | 8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB+300% |
| Process | 12 nm | 6 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Zen+ (2018−2019) | Rembrandt R (2025) |
| PassMark | 12,346+1% | 12,188 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 5,802 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,842 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 6,073 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 5 2600E) / SVM (Ryzen Z2 Go). The Ryzen Z2 Go includes integrated graphics (Radeon 680M), while the Ryzen 5 2600E requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen Z2 Go targets Budget. Direct competitor: Ryzen Z2 Go rivals Core Ultra 5 135U.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 2600E | Ryzen Z2 Go |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon 680M |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | SVM |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











