Ryzen 5 2600E vs Ryzen Z2 Go

AMD

Ryzen 5 2600E

6 Cores12 Thrd45 WWMax: 4 GHz2018

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen Z2 Go

4 Cores8 Thrd2 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2025

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 2600E

2018

Why buy it

  • +1.3% higher PassMark.
  • +100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2150% higher power demand at 45W vs 2W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Ryzen Z2 Go can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen Z2 Go

2025

Why buy it

  • Draws 2W instead of 45W, a 43W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while Ryzen 5 2600E needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (12,188 vs 12,346).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Z2 Go better than Ryzen 5 2600E?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen Z2 Go is ahead with a 0.7% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 2600E pulls ahead with 1.3% better PassMark. Ryzen 5 2600E also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 2600E is the better fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen Z2 Go still looks like the safer overall buy. Ryzen Z2 Go is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 0.7% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen Z2 Go is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2018) and a healthier platform with a newer socket and DDR5 instead of AM4. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRyzen 5 2600ERyzen Z2 Go
1080p
low176 FPS176 FPS
medium154 FPS139 FPS
high127 FPS112 FPS
ultra103 FPS89 FPS
1440p
low145 FPS145 FPS
medium122 FPS113 FPS
high97 FPS91 FPS
ultra78 FPS73 FPS
4K
low66 FPS77 FPS
medium59 FPS65 FPS
high47 FPS52 FPS
ultra37 FPS40 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRyzen 5 2600ERyzen Z2 Go
1080p
low252 FPS286 FPS
medium219 FPS241 FPS
high195 FPS216 FPS
ultra156 FPS184 FPS
1440p
low227 FPS249 FPS
medium199 FPS213 FPS
high177 FPS194 FPS
ultra145 FPS163 FPS
4K
low178 FPS195 FPS
medium160 FPS172 FPS
high141 FPS143 FPS
ultra106 FPS119 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRyzen 5 2600ERyzen Z2 Go
1080p
low309 FPS305 FPS
medium309 FPS305 FPS
high309 FPS305 FPS
ultra309 FPS305 FPS
1440p
low309 FPS305 FPS
medium309 FPS305 FPS
high309 FPS305 FPS
ultra309 FPS305 FPS
4K
low309 FPS305 FPS
medium292 FPS305 FPS
high253 FPS277 FPS
ultra200 FPS220 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRyzen 5 2600ERyzen Z2 Go
1080p
low309 FPS305 FPS
medium309 FPS305 FPS
high309 FPS305 FPS
ultra309 FPS305 FPS
1440p
low309 FPS305 FPS
medium309 FPS305 FPS
high309 FPS305 FPS
ultra309 FPS305 FPS
4K
low309 FPS305 FPS
medium309 FPS305 FPS
high309 FPS305 FPS
ultra309 FPS305 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 2600E and Ryzen Z2 Go

AMD

Ryzen 5 2600E

The Ryzen 5 2600E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 12,346 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Ryzen Z2 Go

The Ryzen Z2 Go is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Rembrandt R (2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 6 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB + 8 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 12,188 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 2600E packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen Z2 Go offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Ryzen 5 2600E has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 2600E versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen Z2 Go — a 7.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen Z2 Go (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 5 2600E uses the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture (12 nm), while the Ryzen Z2 Go uses Rembrandt R (2025) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 2600E scores 12,346 against the Ryzen Z2 Go's 12,188 — a 1.3% lead for the Ryzen 5 2600E. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 2600E vs 8 MB on the Ryzen Z2 Go.

FeatureRyzen 5 2600ERyzen Z2 Go
Cores / Threads
6 / 12+50%
4 / 8
Boost Clock
4 GHz
4.3 GHz+7%
Base Clock
3.1 GHz+3%
3 GHz
L3 Cache
16 MB (total)+100%
8 MB
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
2 MB+300%
Process
12 nm
6 nm-50%
Architecture
Zen+ (2018−2019)
Rembrandt R (2025)
PassMark
12,346+1%
12,188
Cinebench R23 Multi
5,802
Geekbench 6 Single
1,842
Geekbench 6 Multi
6,073
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 5 2600E) / SVM (Ryzen Z2 Go). The Ryzen Z2 Go includes integrated graphics (Radeon 680M), while the Ryzen 5 2600E requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen Z2 Go targets Budget. Direct competitor: Ryzen Z2 Go rivals Core Ultra 5 135U.

FeatureRyzen 5 2600ERyzen Z2 Go
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon 680M
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
SVM
Target Use
Budget