
Ryzen 5 2600E
Popular choices:

Xeon W-10855M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 2600E
2018Why buy it
- ✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-10855M across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌2900% higher power demand at 45W vs 1.5W.
Xeon W-10855M
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 45W, a 44W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,249 vs 12,346).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $118 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 2600E mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Ryzen 5 2600E
2018Xeon W-10855M
2020Why buy it
- ✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 45W, a 44W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-10855M across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌2900% higher power demand at 45W vs 1.5W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,249 vs 12,346).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $118 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 2600E mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W-10855M better than Ryzen 5 2600E?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 2600E | Xeon W-10855M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 176 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 175 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 235 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 2600E | Xeon W-10855M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 252 FPS | 306 FPS |
| medium | 219 FPS | 280 FPS |
| high | 195 FPS | 254 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 227 FPS | 300 FPS |
| medium | 199 FPS | 245 FPS |
| high | 177 FPS | 225 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 194 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 178 FPS | 251 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 191 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 159 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 2600E | Xeon W-10855M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 306 FPS |
| medium | 309 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 309 FPS | 306 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 306 FPS |
| medium | 309 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 309 FPS | 306 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 306 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 253 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 294 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 2600E | Xeon W-10855M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 306 FPS |
| medium | 309 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 309 FPS | 306 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 306 FPS |
| medium | 309 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 309 FPS | 306 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 306 FPS |
| medium | 309 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 309 FPS | 306 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 2600E and Xeon W-10855M


Ryzen 5 2600E
Ryzen 5 2600E
The Ryzen 5 2600E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 12,346 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon W-10855M
Xeon W-10855M
The Xeon W-10855M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB. L2 cache: 1.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 12,249 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 5 2600E and Xeon W-10855M share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 2600E versus 4.9 GHz on the Xeon W-10855M — a 20.2% clock advantage for the Xeon W-10855M (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Ryzen 5 2600E uses the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon W-10855M uses Comet Lake-H (2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 2600E scores 12,346 against the Xeon W-10855M's 12,249 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen 5 2600E. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 2600E vs 12 MB on the Xeon W-10855M.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 2600E | Xeon W-10855M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz | 4.9 GHz+23% |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz+11% | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total)+33% | 12 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1.5 MB+200% |
| Process | 12 nm-14% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Zen+ (2018−2019) | Comet Lake-H (2020) |
| PassMark | 12,346 | 12,249 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 2600E uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-10855M uses BGA1440 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 2600E | Xeon W-10855M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | BGA1440 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











