Ryzen 5 2600E vs Xeon E5-2640 v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 2600E

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 90W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2640 v4 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (12,346 vs 12,470).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 25 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2640 v4, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.

Xeon E5-2640 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+56.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.

Trade-offs

❌100% higher power demand at 90W vs 45W.

Ryzen 5 2600E

2018

Xeon E5-2640 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 90W, a 45W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+56.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2640 v4 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (12,346 vs 12,470).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 25 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2640 v4, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.

Trade-offs

❌100% higher power demand at 90W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2640 v4 better than Ryzen 5 2600E?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E5-2640 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 2600E is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2640 v4 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 5.5% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2640 v4 is the better fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 20 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 56.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2640 v4 still looks like the safer overall buy. Xeon E5-2640 v4 is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 5.5% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 2600E is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 5 2600E Benchmark Check

Xeon E5-2640 v4 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 2600E	Xeon E5-2640 v4
1080p
low	176 FPS	160 FPS
medium	154 FPS	140 FPS
high	127 FPS	113 FPS
ultra	103 FPS	93 FPS
1440p
low	145 FPS	135 FPS
medium	122 FPS	115 FPS
high	97 FPS	89 FPS
ultra	78 FPS	73 FPS
4K
low	66 FPS	63 FPS
medium	59 FPS	57 FPS
high	47 FPS	44 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	35 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 2600E Open Xeon E5-2640 v4

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 2600E	Xeon E5-2640 v4
1080p
low	252 FPS	312 FPS
medium	219 FPS	290 FPS
high	195 FPS	253 FPS
ultra	156 FPS	208 FPS
1440p
low	227 FPS	278 FPS
medium	199 FPS	254 FPS
high	177 FPS	222 FPS
ultra	145 FPS	181 FPS
4K
low	178 FPS	180 FPS
medium	160 FPS	164 FPS
high	141 FPS	144 FPS
ultra	106 FPS	114 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 2600E Open Xeon E5-2640 v4

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 5 2600E	Xeon E5-2640 v4
1080p
low	309 FPS	312 FPS
medium	309 FPS	312 FPS
high	309 FPS	312 FPS
ultra	309 FPS	312 FPS
1440p
low	309 FPS	312 FPS
medium	309 FPS	312 FPS
high	309 FPS	312 FPS
ultra	309 FPS	312 FPS
4K
low	309 FPS	312 FPS
medium	292 FPS	312 FPS
high	253 FPS	312 FPS
ultra	200 FPS	279 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 2600E Open Xeon E5-2640 v4

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 5 2600E	Xeon E5-2640 v4
1080p
low	309 FPS	312 FPS
medium	309 FPS	312 FPS
high	309 FPS	312 FPS
ultra	309 FPS	312 FPS
1440p
low	309 FPS	312 FPS
medium	309 FPS	312 FPS
high	309 FPS	312 FPS
ultra	309 FPS	312 FPS
4K
low	309 FPS	312 FPS
medium	309 FPS	312 FPS
high	309 FPS	312 FPS
ultra	309 FPS	312 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 2600E Open Xeon E5-2640 v4

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 2600E and Xeon E5-2640 v4

Ryzen 5 2600E

The Ryzen 5 2600E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 12,346 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2640 v4

The Xeon E5-2640 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 90 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 12,470 points. Launch price was $939.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 2600E packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2640 v4 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon E5-2640 v4 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 2600E versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2640 v4 — a 16.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 2600E (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Ryzen 5 2600E uses the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon E5-2640 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 2600E scores 12,346 against the Xeon E5-2640 v4's 12,470 — a 1% lead for the Xeon E5-2640 v4. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 2600E vs 25 MB on the Xeon E5-2640 v4.

Feature	Ryzen 5 2600E	Xeon E5-2640 v4
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	10 / 20+67%
Boost Clock	4 GHz+18%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.1 GHz+29%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	25 MB+56%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	2.5 MB+400%
Process	12 nm-14%	14 nm
Architecture	Zen+ (2018−2019)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	12,346	12,470+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 2600E uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2640 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.