
Ryzen 5 2600E
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-1680 v2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 2600E
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 130W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-1680 v2 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,346 vs 12,396).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-1680 v2, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
Xeon E5-1680 v2
2013Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+56.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,723 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 2600E mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌188.9% higher power demand at 130W vs 45W.
Ryzen 5 2600E
2018Xeon E5-1680 v2
2013Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 130W, a 85W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+56.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-1680 v2 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,346 vs 12,396).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-1680 v2, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,723 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 2600E mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌188.9% higher power demand at 130W vs 45W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5-1680 v2 better than Ryzen 5 2600E?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 2600E | Xeon E5-1680 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 176 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 2600E | Xeon E5-1680 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 252 FPS | 310 FPS |
| medium | 219 FPS | 310 FPS |
| high | 195 FPS | 297 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 254 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 227 FPS | 310 FPS |
| medium | 199 FPS | 302 FPS |
| high | 177 FPS | 261 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 220 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 178 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 147 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 2600E | Xeon E5-1680 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 310 FPS |
| medium | 309 FPS | 310 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 310 FPS |
| ultra | 309 FPS | 310 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 310 FPS |
| medium | 309 FPS | 310 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 310 FPS |
| ultra | 309 FPS | 310 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 310 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 310 FPS |
| high | 253 FPS | 310 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 275 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 2600E | Xeon E5-1680 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 310 FPS |
| medium | 309 FPS | 310 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 310 FPS |
| ultra | 309 FPS | 310 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 310 FPS |
| medium | 309 FPS | 310 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 310 FPS |
| ultra | 309 FPS | 310 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 310 FPS |
| medium | 309 FPS | 310 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 310 FPS |
| ultra | 309 FPS | 310 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 2600E and Xeon E5-1680 v2


Ryzen 5 2600E
Ryzen 5 2600E
The Ryzen 5 2600E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 12,346 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-1680 v2
Xeon E5-1680 v2
The Xeon E5-1680 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600, DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 12,396 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 2600E packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-1680 v2 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-1680 v2 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 2600E versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-1680 v2 — a 2.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 2600E (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 5 2600E uses the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon E5-1680 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 2600E scores 12,346 against the Xeon E5-1680 v2's 12,396 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon E5-1680 v2. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 2600E vs 25 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1680 v2.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 2600E | Xeon E5-1680 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+3% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz+3% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 25 MB (total)+56% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 12 nm-45% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Zen+ (2018−2019) | Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) |
| PassMark | 12,346 | 12,396 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 8,579 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 750 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 4,500 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 2600E uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-1680 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 2600E | Xeon E5-1680 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1866 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 256 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 4 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 40 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 5 2600E) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon E5-1680 v2). Primary use case: Xeon E5-1680 v2 targets Server/Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon E5-1680 v2 rivals Core i7-4960X.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 2600E | Xeon E5-1680 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Server/Workstation |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











