Ryzen 5 2600E vs Xeon E5-1680 v2

AMD

Ryzen 5 2600E

6 Cores12 Thrd45 WWMax: 4 GHz2018

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon E5-1680 v2

8 Cores16 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2013

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 2600E

2018

Why buy it

  • Draws 45W instead of 130W, a 85W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-1680 v2 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (12,346 vs 12,396).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 25 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-1680 v2, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-1680 v2

2013

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +10.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +56.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $1,723 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 2600E mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 188.9% higher power demand at 130W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-1680 v2 better than Ryzen 5 2600E?
Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E5-1680 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 2600E is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-1680 v2 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 10.8% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-1680 v2 is the better fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 56.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon E5-1680 v2 is the smarter buy today. Xeon E5-1680 v2 is at an unclear MSRP at $1,723 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 10.8% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (7.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 2600E is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRyzen 5 2600EXeon E5-1680 v2
1080p
low176 FPS167 FPS
medium154 FPS145 FPS
high127 FPS119 FPS
ultra103 FPS98 FPS
1440p
low145 FPS140 FPS
medium122 FPS118 FPS
high97 FPS94 FPS
ultra78 FPS76 FPS
4K
low66 FPS64 FPS
medium59 FPS57 FPS
high47 FPS45 FPS
ultra37 FPS36 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRyzen 5 2600EXeon E5-1680 v2
1080p
low252 FPS310 FPS
medium219 FPS310 FPS
high195 FPS297 FPS
ultra156 FPS254 FPS
1440p
low227 FPS310 FPS
medium199 FPS302 FPS
high177 FPS261 FPS
ultra145 FPS220 FPS
4K
low178 FPS217 FPS
medium160 FPS196 FPS
high141 FPS179 FPS
ultra106 FPS147 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRyzen 5 2600EXeon E5-1680 v2
1080p
low309 FPS310 FPS
medium309 FPS310 FPS
high309 FPS310 FPS
ultra309 FPS310 FPS
1440p
low309 FPS310 FPS
medium309 FPS310 FPS
high309 FPS310 FPS
ultra309 FPS310 FPS
4K
low309 FPS310 FPS
medium292 FPS310 FPS
high253 FPS310 FPS
ultra200 FPS275 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRyzen 5 2600EXeon E5-1680 v2
1080p
low309 FPS310 FPS
medium309 FPS310 FPS
high309 FPS310 FPS
ultra309 FPS310 FPS
1440p
low309 FPS310 FPS
medium309 FPS310 FPS
high309 FPS310 FPS
ultra309 FPS310 FPS
4K
low309 FPS310 FPS
medium309 FPS310 FPS
high309 FPS310 FPS
ultra309 FPS310 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 2600E and Xeon E5-1680 v2

AMD

Ryzen 5 2600E

The Ryzen 5 2600E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 12,346 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Xeon E5-1680 v2

The Xeon E5-1680 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600, DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 12,396 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 2600E packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-1680 v2 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-1680 v2 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 2600E versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-1680 v2 — a 2.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 2600E (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 5 2600E uses the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon E5-1680 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 2600E scores 12,346 against the Xeon E5-1680 v2's 12,396 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon E5-1680 v2. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 2600E vs 25 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1680 v2.

FeatureRyzen 5 2600EXeon E5-1680 v2
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock
4 GHz+3%
3.9 GHz
Base Clock
3.1 GHz+3%
3 GHz
L3 Cache
16 MB (total)
25 MB (total)+56%
L2 Cache
512K (per core)+100%
256K (per core)
Process
12 nm-45%
22 nm
Architecture
Zen+ (2018−2019)
Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
PassMark
12,346
12,396
Cinebench R23 Multi
8,579
Geekbench 6 Single
750
Geekbench 6 Multi
4,500
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 2600E uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-1680 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 5 2600EXeon E5-1680 v2
Socket
AM4
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB
RAM Channels
4
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
40
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 5 2600E) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon E5-1680 v2). Primary use case: Xeon E5-1680 v2 targets Server/Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon E5-1680 v2 rivals Core i7-4960X.

FeatureRyzen 5 2600EXeon E5-1680 v2
Integrated GPU
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Server/Workstation