
Ryzen 5 2600E
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 7235HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 2600E
2018Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7235HS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,346 vs 12,379).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7235HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Ryzen 5 7235HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.2% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
Ryzen 5 2600E
2018Ryzen 5 7235HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.2% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7235HS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,346 vs 12,379).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7235HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 7235HS better than Ryzen 5 2600E?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 2600E | Ryzen 5 7235HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 176 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 2600E | Ryzen 5 7235HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 252 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 219 FPS | 232 FPS |
| high | 195 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 227 FPS | 232 FPS |
| medium | 199 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 177 FPS | 186 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 178 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 104 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 2600E | Ryzen 5 7235HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 309 FPS |
| medium | 309 FPS | 309 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 309 FPS |
| ultra | 309 FPS | 309 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 309 FPS |
| medium | 309 FPS | 309 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 309 FPS |
| ultra | 309 FPS | 309 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 309 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 253 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 221 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 2600E | Ryzen 5 7235HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 309 FPS |
| medium | 309 FPS | 309 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 309 FPS |
| ultra | 309 FPS | 309 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 309 FPS |
| medium | 309 FPS | 309 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 309 FPS |
| ultra | 309 FPS | 309 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 309 FPS |
| medium | 309 FPS | 309 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 309 FPS |
| ultra | 309 FPS | 309 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 2600E and Ryzen 5 7235HS


Ryzen 5 2600E
Ryzen 5 2600E
The Ryzen 5 2600E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 12,346 points. Launch price was $149.


Ryzen 5 7235HS
Ryzen 5 7235HS
The Ryzen 5 7235HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 12,379 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 2600E packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 5 7235HS offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Ryzen 5 2600E has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 2600E versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7235HS — a 4.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7235HS (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 2600E uses the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture (12 nm), while the Ryzen 5 7235HS uses Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 2600E scores 12,346 against the Ryzen 5 7235HS's 12,379 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen 5 7235HS. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 2600E vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7235HS.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 2600E | Ryzen 5 7235HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+50% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz | 4.2 GHz+5% |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz | 3.2 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total)+100% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 12 nm | 6 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Zen+ (2018−2019) | Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 12,346 | 12,379 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 2600E uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 7235HS uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 2600E | Ryzen 5 7235HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











