Core Ultra 7 155H vs Ryzen Z1 Extreme

Intel

Core Ultra 7 155H

16 Cores22 Thrd0 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2023

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen Z1 Extreme

8 Cores16 Thrd15 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2023

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core Ultra 7 155H

2023

Why buy it

  • +0.1% higher PassMark.
  • +50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc Graphics (8 Xe-cores), while Ryzen Z1 Extreme needs a discrete GPU.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Ryzen Z1 Extreme.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Ryzen Z1 Extreme

2023

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (24,668 vs 24,705).
    • Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
    • No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 7 155H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
    • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core Ultra 7 155H.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Core Ultra 7 155H better than Ryzen Z1 Extreme?
    It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen Z1 Extreme is ahead with a 2.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 7 155H pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark. Core Ultra 7 155H also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 7 155H is the better fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 22 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Core Ultra 7 155H still looks like the safer overall buy. Core Ultra 7 155H is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you 0.1% better PassMark.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Core Ultra 7 155H is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 22 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Games Benchmarks

    Paired with RTX 4090

    To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

    Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

    Path of Exile 2

    Path of Exile 2

    PresetCore Ultra 7 155HRyzen Z1 Extreme
    1080p
    low308 FPS256 FPS
    medium278 FPS236 FPS
    high232 FPS202 FPS
    ultra198 FPS172 FPS
    1440p
    low251 FPS225 FPS
    medium201 FPS188 FPS
    high163 FPS155 FPS
    ultra143 FPS135 FPS
    4K
    low173 FPS154 FPS
    medium139 FPS129 FPS
    high107 FPS100 FPS
    ultra93 FPS87 FPS
    Counter-Strike 2

    Counter-Strike 2

    PresetCore Ultra 7 155HRyzen Z1 Extreme
    1080p
    low618 FPS472 FPS
    medium532 FPS396 FPS
    high434 FPS345 FPS
    ultra389 FPS308 FPS
    1440p
    low550 FPS413 FPS
    medium457 FPS365 FPS
    high385 FPS318 FPS
    ultra328 FPS272 FPS
    4K
    low340 FPS274 FPS
    medium286 FPS253 FPS
    high261 FPS241 FPS
    ultra229 FPS208 FPS
    League of Legends

    League of Legends

    PresetCore Ultra 7 155HRyzen Z1 Extreme
    1080p
    low618 FPS617 FPS
    medium618 FPS617 FPS
    high618 FPS617 FPS
    ultra618 FPS617 FPS
    1440p
    low618 FPS617 FPS
    medium618 FPS617 FPS
    high618 FPS533 FPS
    ultra543 FPS452 FPS
    4K
    low618 FPS518 FPS
    medium531 FPS448 FPS
    high475 FPS398 FPS
    ultra402 FPS336 FPS
    Valorant

    Valorant

    PresetCore Ultra 7 155HRyzen Z1 Extreme
    1080p
    low618 FPS617 FPS
    medium618 FPS617 FPS
    high618 FPS617 FPS
    ultra618 FPS617 FPS
    1440p
    low618 FPS617 FPS
    medium618 FPS617 FPS
    high618 FPS617 FPS
    ultra579 FPS597 FPS
    4K
    low606 FPS595 FPS
    medium538 FPS535 FPS
    high486 FPS480 FPS
    ultra423 FPS418 FPS

    Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 155H and Ryzen Z1 Extreme

    Intel

    Core Ultra 7 155H

    The Core Ultra 7 155H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 22 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,705 points. Launch price was $503.

    AMD

    Ryzen Z1 Extreme

    The Ryzen Z1 Extreme is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Maio 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,668 points. Launch price was $299.

    Processing Power

    The Core Ultra 7 155H packs 16 cores / 22 threads, while the Ryzen Z1 Extreme offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 7 155H has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 155H versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen Z1 Extreme — a 6.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen Z1 Extreme (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 155H uses the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen Z1 Extreme uses Phoenix (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 155H scores 24,705 against the Ryzen Z1 Extreme's 24,668 — a 0.1% lead for the Core Ultra 7 155H. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 155H vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen Z1 Extreme.

    FeatureCore Ultra 7 155HRyzen Z1 Extreme
    Cores / Threads
    16 / 22+100%
    8 / 16
    Boost Clock
    4.8 GHz
    5.1 GHz+6%
    Base Clock
    3.8 GHz+15%
    3.3 GHz
    L3 Cache
    24 MB (total)+50%
    16 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    2 MB (per core)+100%
    1 MB (per core)
    Process
    7 nm
    4 nm-43%
    Architecture
    Meteor Lake-H (2023)
    Phoenix (Zen 4) (2023)
    PassMark
    24,705
    24,668
    Cinebench R23 Multi
    17,650
    Geekbench 6 Single
    2,384
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    12,433
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Core Ultra 7 155H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Z1 Extreme uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureCore Ultra 7 155HRyzen Z1 Extreme
    Socket
    FCBGA2049
    FP8
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 5.0+25%
    PCIe 4.0
    Max RAM Speed
    LPDDR5x-7467, DDR5-5600
    Max RAM Capacity
    96 GB
    RAM Channels
    2
    ECC Support
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    28
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core Ultra 7 155H) / not specified (Ryzen Z1 Extreme). The Core Ultra 7 155H includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics (8 Xe-cores)), while the Ryzen Z1 Extreme requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 155H targets Thin-and-light Performance / AI. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 155H rivals Ryzen 7 8840HS.

    FeatureCore Ultra 7 155HRyzen Z1 Extreme
    Integrated GPU
    Yes
    IGPU Model
    Intel Arc Graphics (8 Xe-cores)
    Unlocked
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-d, EPT
    Target Use
    Thin-and-light Performance / AI