Core Ultra 7 155H vs Xeon Gold 5415+

Intel

Core Ultra 7 155H

16 Cores22 Thrd0 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2023

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon Gold 5415+

8 Cores16 Thrd150 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2023

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core Ultra 7 155H

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +12.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc Graphics (8 Xe-cores), while Xeon Gold 5415+ needs a discrete GPU.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Xeon Gold 5415+.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (24,705 vs 24,842).

Xeon Gold 5415+

2023

Why buy it

  • +0.6% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 155H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 7 155H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core Ultra 7 155H.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 5415+ better than Core Ultra 7 155H?
Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon Gold 5415+ makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core Ultra 7 155H is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 5415+ is the better fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon Gold 5415+ still looks like the safer overall buy. Xeon Gold 5415+ is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you 0.6% better PassMark.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Gold 5415+ is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more overall headroom and a better platform outlook.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore Ultra 7 155HXeon Gold 5415+
1080p
low308 FPS183 FPS
medium278 FPS150 FPS
high232 FPS126 FPS
ultra198 FPS100 FPS
1440p
low251 FPS147 FPS
medium201 FPS115 FPS
high163 FPS93 FPS
ultra143 FPS73 FPS
4K
low173 FPS68 FPS
medium139 FPS57 FPS
high107 FPS45 FPS
ultra93 FPS36 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore Ultra 7 155HXeon Gold 5415+
1080p
low618 FPS511 FPS
medium532 FPS440 FPS
high434 FPS367 FPS
ultra389 FPS332 FPS
1440p
low550 FPS450 FPS
medium457 FPS399 FPS
high385 FPS339 FPS
ultra328 FPS295 FPS
4K
low340 FPS292 FPS
medium286 FPS261 FPS
high261 FPS239 FPS
ultra229 FPS214 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore Ultra 7 155HXeon Gold 5415+
1080p
low618 FPS621 FPS
medium618 FPS621 FPS
high618 FPS621 FPS
ultra618 FPS621 FPS
1440p
low618 FPS621 FPS
medium618 FPS621 FPS
high618 FPS621 FPS
ultra543 FPS621 FPS
4K
low618 FPS541 FPS
medium531 FPS444 FPS
high475 FPS385 FPS
ultra402 FPS314 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore Ultra 7 155HXeon Gold 5415+
1080p
low618 FPS621 FPS
medium618 FPS621 FPS
high618 FPS621 FPS
ultra618 FPS621 FPS
1440p
low618 FPS621 FPS
medium618 FPS621 FPS
high618 FPS571 FPS
ultra579 FPS487 FPS
4K
low606 FPS540 FPS
medium538 FPS473 FPS
high486 FPS421 FPS
ultra423 FPS357 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 155H and Xeon Gold 5415+

Intel

Core Ultra 7 155H

The Core Ultra 7 155H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 22 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,705 points. Launch price was $503.

Intel

Xeon Gold 5415+

The Xeon Gold 5415+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 22.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 24,842 points. Launch price was $1,076.

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 7 155H packs 16 cores / 22 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5415+ offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 7 155H has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 155H versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5415+ — a 15.7% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 155H (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 155H uses the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5415+ uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 155H scores 24,705 against the Xeon Gold 5415+'s 24,842 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon Gold 5415+. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 155H vs 22.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 5415+.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 155HXeon Gold 5415+
Cores / Threads
16 / 22+100%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
4.8 GHz+17%
4.1 GHz
Base Clock
3.8 GHz+31%
2.9 GHz
L3 Cache
24 MB (total)+7%
22.5 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
Process
7 nm-30%
10 nm
Architecture
Meteor Lake-H (2023)
Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark
24,705
24,842
Cinebench R23 Multi
17,650
Geekbench 6 Single
2,384
Geekbench 6 Multi
12,433
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 7 155H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 5415+ uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 155HXeon Gold 5415+
Socket
FCBGA2049
LGA4677
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR5x-7467, DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity
96 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
28
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core Ultra 7 155H) / not specified (Xeon Gold 5415+). The Core Ultra 7 155H includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics (8 Xe-cores)), while the Xeon Gold 5415+ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 155H targets Thin-and-light Performance / AI. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 155H rivals Ryzen 7 8840HS.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 155HXeon Gold 5415+
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel Arc Graphics (8 Xe-cores)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Thin-and-light Performance / AI