
Core Ultra 7 155H
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 5415+
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core Ultra 7 155H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc Graphics (8 Xe-cores), while Xeon Gold 5415+ needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Xeon Gold 5415+.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,705 vs 24,842).
Xeon Gold 5415+
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 155H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 7 155H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core Ultra 7 155H.
Core Ultra 7 155H
2023Xeon Gold 5415+
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc Graphics (8 Xe-cores), while Xeon Gold 5415+ needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Xeon Gold 5415+.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,705 vs 24,842).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 155H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 7 155H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core Ultra 7 155H.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 5415+ better than Core Ultra 7 155H?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 155H | Xeon Gold 5415+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 232 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 198 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 251 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 201 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 163 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 155H | Xeon Gold 5415+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 618 FPS | 511 FPS |
| medium | 532 FPS | 440 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 389 FPS | 332 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 550 FPS | 450 FPS |
| medium | 457 FPS | 399 FPS |
| high | 385 FPS | 339 FPS |
| ultra | 328 FPS | 295 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 292 FPS |
| medium | 286 FPS | 261 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 239 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 214 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 155H | Xeon Gold 5415+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 618 FPS | 621 FPS |
| medium | 618 FPS | 621 FPS |
| high | 618 FPS | 621 FPS |
| ultra | 618 FPS | 621 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 618 FPS | 621 FPS |
| medium | 618 FPS | 621 FPS |
| high | 618 FPS | 621 FPS |
| ultra | 543 FPS | 621 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 618 FPS | 541 FPS |
| medium | 531 FPS | 444 FPS |
| high | 475 FPS | 385 FPS |
| ultra | 402 FPS | 314 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 155H | Xeon Gold 5415+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 618 FPS | 621 FPS |
| medium | 618 FPS | 621 FPS |
| high | 618 FPS | 621 FPS |
| ultra | 618 FPS | 621 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 618 FPS | 621 FPS |
| medium | 618 FPS | 621 FPS |
| high | 618 FPS | 571 FPS |
| ultra | 579 FPS | 487 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 606 FPS | 540 FPS |
| medium | 538 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 486 FPS | 421 FPS |
| ultra | 423 FPS | 357 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 155H and Xeon Gold 5415+

Core Ultra 7 155H
Core Ultra 7 155H
The Core Ultra 7 155H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 22 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,705 points. Launch price was $503.

Xeon Gold 5415+
Xeon Gold 5415+
The Xeon Gold 5415+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 22.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 24,842 points. Launch price was $1,076.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 7 155H packs 16 cores / 22 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5415+ offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 7 155H has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 155H versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5415+ — a 15.7% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 155H (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 155H uses the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5415+ uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 155H scores 24,705 against the Xeon Gold 5415+'s 24,842 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon Gold 5415+. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 155H vs 22.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 5415+.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 155H | Xeon Gold 5415+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 22+100% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+17% | 4.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+31% | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total)+7% | 22.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Meteor Lake-H (2023) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 24,705 | 24,842 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 17,650 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,384 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 12,433 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 7 155H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 5415+ uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 155H | Xeon Gold 5415+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2049 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5x-7467, DDR5-5600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 96 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core Ultra 7 155H) / not specified (Xeon Gold 5415+). The Core Ultra 7 155H includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics (8 Xe-cores)), while the Xeon Gold 5415+ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 155H targets Thin-and-light Performance / AI. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 155H rivals Ryzen 7 8840HS.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 155H | Xeon Gold 5415+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel Arc Graphics (8 Xe-cores) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Thin-and-light Performance / AI | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













