
Core Ultra 7 155H
Popular choices:

Xeon Silver 4410Y
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core Ultra 7 155H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc Graphics (8 Xe-cores), while Xeon Silver 4410Y needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Xeon Silver 4410Y.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,705 vs 24,895).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4410Y, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
Xeon Silver 4410Y
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 155H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 7 155H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core Ultra 7 155H.
Core Ultra 7 155H
2023Xeon Silver 4410Y
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc Graphics (8 Xe-cores), while Xeon Silver 4410Y needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Xeon Silver 4410Y.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,705 vs 24,895).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4410Y, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 155H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 7 155H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core Ultra 7 155H.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Silver 4410Y better than Core Ultra 7 155H?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 155H | Xeon Silver 4410Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 232 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 198 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 251 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 201 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 163 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 155H | Xeon Silver 4410Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 618 FPS | 244 FPS |
| medium | 532 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 389 FPS | 151 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 550 FPS | 206 FPS |
| medium | 457 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 385 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 328 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 133 FPS |
| medium | 286 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 93 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 155H | Xeon Silver 4410Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 618 FPS | 622 FPS |
| medium | 618 FPS | 622 FPS |
| high | 618 FPS | 622 FPS |
| ultra | 618 FPS | 622 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 618 FPS | 622 FPS |
| medium | 618 FPS | 622 FPS |
| high | 618 FPS | 622 FPS |
| ultra | 543 FPS | 566 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 618 FPS | 509 FPS |
| medium | 531 FPS | 400 FPS |
| high | 475 FPS | 350 FPS |
| ultra | 402 FPS | 285 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 155H | Xeon Silver 4410Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 618 FPS | 622 FPS |
| medium | 618 FPS | 622 FPS |
| high | 618 FPS | 622 FPS |
| ultra | 618 FPS | 617 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 618 FPS | 622 FPS |
| medium | 618 FPS | 622 FPS |
| high | 618 FPS | 562 FPS |
| ultra | 579 FPS | 472 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 606 FPS | 527 FPS |
| medium | 538 FPS | 461 FPS |
| high | 486 FPS | 411 FPS |
| ultra | 423 FPS | 349 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 155H and Xeon Silver 4410Y

Core Ultra 7 155H
Core Ultra 7 155H
The Core Ultra 7 155H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 22 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,705 points. Launch price was $503.

Xeon Silver 4410Y
Xeon Silver 4410Y
The Xeon Silver 4410Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4000. Passmark benchmark score: 24,895 points. Launch price was $573.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 7 155H packs 16 cores / 22 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4410Y offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Core Ultra 7 155H has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 155H versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4410Y — a 20.7% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 155H (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 155H uses the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4410Y uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 155H scores 24,705 against the Xeon Silver 4410Y's 24,895 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon Silver 4410Y. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 155H vs 30 MB on the Xeon Silver 4410Y.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 155H | Xeon Silver 4410Y |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 22+33% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+23% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+90% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 30 MB+25% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Meteor Lake-H (2023) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 24,705 | 24,895 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 17,650 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,384 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 12,433 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 7 155H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Silver 4410Y uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 155H | Xeon Silver 4410Y |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2049 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5x-7467, DDR5-5600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 96 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core Ultra 7 155H) / not specified (Xeon Silver 4410Y). The Core Ultra 7 155H includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics (8 Xe-cores)), while the Xeon Silver 4410Y requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 155H targets Thin-and-light Performance / AI. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 155H rivals Ryzen 7 8840HS.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 155H | Xeon Silver 4410Y |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel Arc Graphics (8 Xe-cores) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Thin-and-light Performance / AI | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













