Core Ultra 7 155H vs Ryzen AI 7 350

Intel

Core Ultra 7 155H

16 Cores22 Thrd0 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2023

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen AI 7 350

8 Cores16 Thrd28 WWMax: 5 GHz2025

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core Ultra 7 155H

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +22.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +200% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 8 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc Graphics (8 Xe-cores), while Ryzen AI 7 350 needs a discrete GPU.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Ryzen AI 7 350.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (24,705 vs 24,897).

Ryzen AI 7 350

2025

Why buy it

  • +0.8% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 155H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 24 MB).
  • No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 7 155H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core Ultra 7 155H.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen AI 7 350 better than Core Ultra 7 155H?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Core Ultra 7 155H is ahead with a 22.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen AI 7 350 pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark. Core Ultra 7 155H also has the bigger cache pool with 200% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 8 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen AI 7 350 is the better fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen AI 7 350 still looks like the safer overall buy. Ryzen AI 7 350 is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you 0.8% better PassMark.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen AI 7 350 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 16/22. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore Ultra 7 155HRyzen AI 7 350
1080p
low308 FPS245 FPS
medium278 FPS228 FPS
high232 FPS194 FPS
ultra198 FPS167 FPS
1440p
low251 FPS215 FPS
medium201 FPS181 FPS
high163 FPS149 FPS
ultra143 FPS132 FPS
4K
low173 FPS149 FPS
medium139 FPS126 FPS
high107 FPS98 FPS
ultra93 FPS85 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore Ultra 7 155HRyzen AI 7 350
1080p
low618 FPS212 FPS
medium532 FPS183 FPS
high434 FPS166 FPS
ultra389 FPS147 FPS
1440p
low550 FPS190 FPS
medium457 FPS170 FPS
high385 FPS154 FPS
ultra328 FPS131 FPS
4K
low340 FPS143 FPS
medium286 FPS132 FPS
high261 FPS126 FPS
ultra229 FPS107 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore Ultra 7 155HRyzen AI 7 350
1080p
low618 FPS622 FPS
medium618 FPS595 FPS
high618 FPS512 FPS
ultra618 FPS408 FPS
1440p
low618 FPS622 FPS
medium618 FPS506 FPS
high618 FPS435 FPS
ultra543 FPS353 FPS
4K
low618 FPS436 FPS
medium531 FPS368 FPS
high475 FPS322 FPS
ultra402 FPS261 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore Ultra 7 155HRyzen AI 7 350
1080p
low618 FPS622 FPS
medium618 FPS622 FPS
high618 FPS622 FPS
ultra618 FPS622 FPS
1440p
low618 FPS622 FPS
medium618 FPS622 FPS
high618 FPS588 FPS
ultra579 FPS506 FPS
4K
low606 FPS530 FPS
medium538 FPS478 FPS
high486 FPS425 FPS
ultra423 FPS369 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 155H and Ryzen AI 7 350

Intel

Core Ultra 7 155H

The Core Ultra 7 155H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 22 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,705 points. Launch price was $503.

AMD

Ryzen AI 7 350

The Ryzen AI 7 350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Krackan Point (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,897 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 7 155H packs 16 cores / 22 threads, while the Ryzen AI 7 350 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 7 155H has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 155H versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI 7 350 — a 4.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 7 350 (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 155H uses the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen AI 7 350 uses Krackan Point (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 155H scores 24,705 against the Ryzen AI 7 350's 24,897 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen AI 7 350. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 155H vs 8 MB on the Ryzen AI 7 350.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 155HRyzen AI 7 350
Cores / Threads
16 / 22+100%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
4.8 GHz
5 GHz+4%
Base Clock
3.8 GHz+90%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
24 MB (total)+200%
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)+100%
1 MB (per core)
Process
7 nm
4 nm-43%
Architecture
Meteor Lake-H (2023)
Krackan Point (2025)
PassMark
24,705
24,897
Cinebench R23 Multi
17,650
Geekbench 6 Single
2,384
Geekbench 6 Multi
12,433
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 7 155H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen AI 7 350 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 155HRyzen AI 7 350
Socket
FCBGA2049
FP8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR5x-7467, DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity
96 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
28
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core Ultra 7 155H) / not specified (Ryzen AI 7 350). The Core Ultra 7 155H includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics (8 Xe-cores)), while the Ryzen AI 7 350 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 155H targets Thin-and-light Performance / AI. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 155H rivals Ryzen 7 8840HS.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 155HRyzen AI 7 350
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel Arc Graphics (8 Xe-cores)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Thin-and-light Performance / AI