Core Ultra 7 155H vs Xeon Gold 6240

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core Ultra 7 155H

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +24.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc Graphics (8 Xe-cores), while Xeon Gold 6240 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Xeon Gold 6240.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (24,705 vs 24,918).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6240, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads.

Xeon Gold 6240

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 155H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 7 155H moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 7 155H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core Ultra 7 155H.

Core Ultra 7 155H

2023

Xeon Gold 6240

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +24.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc Graphics (8 Xe-cores), while Xeon Gold 6240 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Xeon Gold 6240.

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (24,705 vs 24,918).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6240, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 155H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 7 155H moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 7 155H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core Ultra 7 155H.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6240 better than Core Ultra 7 155H?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon Gold 6240 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core Ultra 7 155H is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6240 is the better fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 18 cores and 36 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 6240 still looks like the safer overall buy. Xeon Gold 6240 is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you 0.9% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Ultra 7 155H is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019) and a healthier platform with FCBGA2049 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core Ultra 7 155H Benchmark Check

Xeon Gold 6240 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core Ultra 7 155H	Xeon Gold 6240
1080p
low	308 FPS	182 FPS
medium	278 FPS	147 FPS
high	232 FPS	120 FPS
ultra	198 FPS	93 FPS
1440p
low	251 FPS	144 FPS
medium	201 FPS	114 FPS
high	163 FPS	92 FPS
ultra	143 FPS	72 FPS
4K
low	173 FPS	67 FPS
medium	139 FPS	56 FPS
high	107 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	35 FPS

Open Core Ultra 7 155H Open Xeon Gold 6240

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core Ultra 7 155H	Xeon Gold 6240
1080p
low	618 FPS	400 FPS
medium	532 FPS	346 FPS
high	434 FPS	290 FPS
ultra	389 FPS	244 FPS
1440p
low	550 FPS	346 FPS
medium	457 FPS	307 FPS
high	385 FPS	258 FPS
ultra	328 FPS	215 FPS
4K
low	340 FPS	225 FPS
medium	286 FPS	200 FPS
high	261 FPS	179 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	147 FPS

Open Core Ultra 7 155H Open Xeon Gold 6240

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core Ultra 7 155H	Xeon Gold 6240
1080p
low	618 FPS	623 FPS
medium	618 FPS	623 FPS
high	618 FPS	623 FPS
ultra	618 FPS	623 FPS
1440p
low	618 FPS	623 FPS
medium	618 FPS	612 FPS
high	618 FPS	580 FPS
ultra	543 FPS	512 FPS
4K
low	618 FPS	462 FPS
medium	531 FPS	361 FPS
high	475 FPS	322 FPS
ultra	402 FPS	261 FPS

Open Core Ultra 7 155H Open Xeon Gold 6240

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core Ultra 7 155H	Xeon Gold 6240
1080p
low	618 FPS	623 FPS
medium	618 FPS	623 FPS
high	618 FPS	623 FPS
ultra	618 FPS	576 FPS
1440p
low	618 FPS	623 FPS
medium	618 FPS	598 FPS
high	618 FPS	517 FPS
ultra	579 FPS	444 FPS
4K
low	606 FPS	469 FPS
medium	538 FPS	421 FPS
high	486 FPS	377 FPS
ultra	423 FPS	328 FPS

Open Core Ultra 7 155H Open Xeon Gold 6240

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 155H and Xeon Gold 6240

Core Ultra 7 155H

The Core Ultra 7 155H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 22 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,705 points. Launch price was $503.

Xeon Gold 6240

The Xeon Gold 6240 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB. L2 cache: 18 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 24,918 points. Launch price was $2,445.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 7 155H packs 16 cores / 22 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6240 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon Gold 6240 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 155H versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6240 — a 20.7% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 155H (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 155H uses the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6240 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 155H scores 24,705 against the Xeon Gold 6240's 24,918 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon Gold 6240. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 155H vs 24.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6240.

Feature	Core Ultra 7 155H	Xeon Gold 6240
Cores / Threads	16 / 22	18 / 36+13%
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz+23%	3.9 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz+46%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)	24.75 MB+3%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	18 MB+800%
Process	7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Meteor Lake-H (2023)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	24,705	24,918
Cinebench R23 Multi	17,650	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,384	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	12,433	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 7 155H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 6240 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core Ultra 7 155H	Xeon Gold 6240
Socket	FCBGA2049	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR5x-7467, DDR5-5600	—
Max RAM Capacity	96 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	28	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core Ultra 7 155H) / not specified (Xeon Gold 6240). The Core Ultra 7 155H includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics (8 Xe-cores)), while the Xeon Gold 6240 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 155H targets Thin-and-light Performance / AI. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 155H rivals Ryzen 7 8840HS.

Feature	Core Ultra 7 155H	Xeon Gold 6240
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Intel Arc Graphics (8 Xe-cores)	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	—
Target Use	Thin-and-light Performance / AI	—