EPYC 9655 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX

AMD

EPYC 9655

96 Cores192 Thrd400 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2024

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX

96 Cores192 Thrd350 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2025

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9655

2024

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • Lower Geekbench multi-core (29,329 vs 30,170).
    • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.2 vs 15.1 PassMark/$ ($11,852 MSRP vs $11,699 MSRP).

    Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX

    2025

    Why buy it

    • Better for gaming: +12.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • Costs $153 less on MSRP ($11,699 MSRP vs $11,852 MSRP).
    • Delivers 14.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 15.1 vs 13.2 PassMark/$ ($11,699 MSRP vs $11,852 MSRP).
    • Draws 350W instead of 400W, a 50W reduction.

    Trade-offs

    • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX better than EPYC 9655?
    Yes. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 12.5% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2.9% better Geekbench multi-core, 12.9% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 12.5% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX is the better fit. You are getting 2.9% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 96 cores and 192 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX is the smarter buy today. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX is $153 cheaper on MSRP at $11,699 MSRP versus $11,852 MSRP, and it gives you a 12.5% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 14.4% better value on MSRP (15.1 vs 13.2 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2024) and more multi-core headroom with 96 cores / 192 threads instead of 96/192. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

    Games Benchmarks

    Paired with RTX 4090

    To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

    Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

    Path of Exile 2

    Path of Exile 2

    PresetEPYC 9655Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX
    1080p
    low170 FPS300 FPS
    medium143 FPS279 FPS
    high122 FPS230 FPS
    ultra99 FPS194 FPS
    1440p
    low149 FPS266 FPS
    medium121 FPS223 FPS
    high99 FPS171 FPS
    ultra83 FPS152 FPS
    4K
    low83 FPS184 FPS
    medium73 FPS154 FPS
    high57 FPS117 FPS
    ultra47 FPS104 FPS
    Counter-Strike 2

    Counter-Strike 2

    PresetEPYC 9655Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX
    1080p
    low696 FPS785 FPS
    medium602 FPS675 FPS
    high475 FPS531 FPS
    ultra411 FPS457 FPS
    1440p
    low566 FPS655 FPS
    medium501 FPS584 FPS
    high414 FPS470 FPS
    ultra336 FPS377 FPS
    4K
    low331 FPS366 FPS
    medium295 FPS331 FPS
    high267 FPS303 FPS
    ultra235 FPS263 FPS
    League of Legends

    League of Legends

    PresetEPYC 9655Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX
    1080p
    low746 FPS887 FPS
    medium633 FPS726 FPS
    high589 FPS653 FPS
    ultra519 FPS555 FPS
    1440p
    low561 FPS692 FPS
    medium474 FPS566 FPS
    high434 FPS497 FPS
    ultra376 FPS418 FPS
    4K
    low411 FPS488 FPS
    medium331 FPS405 FPS
    high299 FPS363 FPS
    ultra238 FPS302 FPS
    Valorant

    Valorant

    PresetEPYC 9655Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX
    1080p
    low1047 FPS1115 FPS
    medium939 FPS1001 FPS
    high821 FPS877 FPS
    ultra744 FPS789 FPS
    1440p
    low839 FPS878 FPS
    medium733 FPS773 FPS
    high641 FPS677 FPS
    ultra562 FPS589 FPS
    4K
    low605 FPS641 FPS
    medium539 FPS571 FPS
    high477 FPS506 FPS
    ultra416 FPS437 FPS

    Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9655 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX

    AMD

    EPYC 9655

    The EPYC 9655 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 156,110 points. Launch price was $11,852.

    AMD

    Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX

    The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 176,281 points. Launch price was $11,700.

    Processing Power

    Both the EPYC 9655 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX share an identical 96-core/192-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the EPYC 9655 versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 9655 uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX uses Shimada Peak (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9655 scores 156,110 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX's 176,281 — a 12.1% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,830 vs 3,000, a 5.8% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 29,329 vs 30,170 (2.8% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX). Both processors carry 384 MB (total) of L3 cache.

    FeatureEPYC 9655Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX
    Cores / Threads
    96 / 192
    96 / 192
    Boost Clock
    4.5 GHz
    5.4 GHz+20%
    Base Clock
    2.6 GHz+4%
    2.5 GHz
    L3 Cache
    384 MB (total)
    384 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    1 MB (per core)
    1 MB (per core)
    Process
    4 nm
    4 nm
    Architecture
    Turin (2024)
    Shimada Peak (2025)
    PassMark
    156,110
    176,281+13%
    Cinebench R23 Multi
    180,000
    Geekbench 6 Single
    2,830
    3,000+6%
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    29,329
    30,170+3%
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The EPYC 9655 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 9 TB 198.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9655) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9655) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX).

    FeatureEPYC 9655Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX
    Socket
    SP5
    sTR5
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 5.0+25%
    PCIe 4.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR5-6000
    DDR5-6400
    Max RAM Capacity
    9 TB+350%
    2048 GB
    RAM Channels
    12+50%
    8
    ECC Support
    Yes
    Yes
    PCIe Lanes
    128
    128
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9655) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX). Primary use case: EPYC 9655 targets Data Center, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX targets High-end Workstation / AI Rendering. Direct competitor: EPYC 9655 rivals Xeon 6979P; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX rivals Xeon w9-3495X.

    FeatureEPYC 9655Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX
    Integrated GPU
    No
    No
    Unlocked
    No
    AVX-512
    Yes
    Yes
    Virtualization
    AMD-V, SEV-SNP
    true
    Target Use
    Data Center
    High-end Workstation / AI Rendering
    💰

    Value Analysis

    The EPYC 9655 launched at $11852 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX debuted at $11699. On MSRP ($11852 vs $11699), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX is $153 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9655 delivers 13.2 pts/$ vs 15.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX the 13.4% better value option.

    FeatureEPYC 9655Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX
    MSRP
    $11852
    $11699-1%
    Performance per Dollar
    13.2
    15.1+14%
    Release Date
    2024
    2025