
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
Popular choices:

Xeon w7-2595X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
2025Why buy it
- ✅+31.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 49 MB).
- ✅Costs $1,610 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $2,039 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 386.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 157.5 vs 32.4 PassMark/$ ($429 MSRP vs $2,039 MSRP).
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w7-2595X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (40,000 vs 48,442).
- ❌40% higher power demand at 350W vs 250W.
Xeon w7-2595X
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +19.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 250W instead of 350W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (49 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 32.4 vs 157.5 PassMark/$ ($2,039 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
2025Xeon w7-2595X
2024Why buy it
- ✅+31.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 49 MB).
- ✅Costs $1,610 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $2,039 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 386.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 157.5 vs 32.4 PassMark/$ ($429 MSRP vs $2,039 MSRP).
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +19.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 250W instead of 350W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w7-2595X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (40,000 vs 48,442).
- ❌40% higher power demand at 350W vs 250W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (49 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 32.4 vs 157.5 PassMark/$ ($2,039 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon w7-2595X better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX | Xeon w7-2595X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 312 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 253 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 214 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 273 FPS | 288 FPS |
| medium | 224 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 174 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 153 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 108 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX | Xeon w7-2595X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 781 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 580 FPS |
| high | 476 FPS | 459 FPS |
| ultra | 402 FPS | 406 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 641 FPS | 555 FPS |
| medium | 546 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 420 FPS | 400 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 328 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 327 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 287 FPS |
| high | 271 FPS | 262 FPS |
| ultra | 228 FPS | 232 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX | Xeon w7-2595X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 888 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 705 FPS | 1219 FPS |
| high | 622 FPS | 1113 FPS |
| ultra | 534 FPS | 875 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 713 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 567 FPS | 928 FPS |
| high | 489 FPS | 834 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 507 FPS | 637 FPS |
| medium | 418 FPS | 540 FPS |
| high | 375 FPS | 481 FPS |
| ultra | 315 FPS | 410 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX | Xeon w7-2595X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1106 FPS | 1124 FPS |
| medium | 991 FPS | 1007 FPS |
| high | 867 FPS | 881 FPS |
| ultra | 781 FPS | 783 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 860 FPS | 865 FPS |
| medium | 759 FPS | 766 FPS |
| high | 664 FPS | 671 FPS |
| ultra | 576 FPS | 590 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 632 FPS | 636 FPS |
| medium | 562 FPS | 566 FPS |
| high | 496 FPS | 500 FPS |
| ultra | 429 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX and Xeon w7-2595X


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 67,561 points. Launch price was $1,649.

Xeon w7-2595X
Xeon w7-2595X
The Xeon w7-2595X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 26 cores and 52 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 48.75 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 66,049 points. Launch price was $2,039.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon w7-2595X offers 26 cores / 52 threads — the Xeon w7-2595X has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-2595X — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX (base: 4.5 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX uses the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon w7-2595X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX scores 67,561 against the Xeon w7-2595X's 66,049 — a 2.3% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 40,000 vs 48,442 (19.1% advantage for the Xeon w7-2595X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,016 vs 2,436, a 21.3% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 23,596 vs 21,758 (8.1% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX). L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX vs 48.75 MB on the Xeon w7-2595X.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX | Xeon w7-2595X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 26 / 52+63% |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+13% | 4.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.5 GHz+61% | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+31% | 48.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Shimada Peak (2025) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 67,561+2% | 66,049 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 40,000 | 48,442+21% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,016+24% | 2,436 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 23,596+8% | 21,758 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX uses the sTR5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w7-2595X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. Both support up to 2048 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX) vs 4 (Xeon w7-2595X). PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX) vs 64 (Xeon w7-2595X) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WRX90 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX) and W790 (Xeon w7-2595X).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX | Xeon w7-2595X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sTR5 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 GB | 2048 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8+100% | 4 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+100% | 64 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support true virtualization. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX rivals Xeon w7-3555; Xeon w7-2595X rivals Ryzen 9 9950X.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX | Xeon w7-2595X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | true |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX launched at $429 MSRP, while the Xeon w7-2595X debuted at $2039. On MSRP ($429 vs $2039), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is $1610 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX delivers 157.5 pts/$ vs 32.4 pts/$ for the Xeon w7-2595X — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX the 131.8% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX | Xeon w7-2595X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $429-79% | $2039 |
| Performance per Dollar | 157.5+386% | 32.4 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












