
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
Popular choices:

Xeon Platinum 8352Y
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.4% higher average FPS across 10 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 48 MB).
- ✅Costs $3,566 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $3,995 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 816.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 157.5 vs 17.2 PassMark/$ ($429 MSRP vs $3,995 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on sTR5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (67,561 vs 68,643).
- ❌70.7% higher power demand at 350W vs 205W.
Xeon Platinum 8352Y
2021Why buy it
- ✅+1.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 205W instead of 350W, a 145W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX across 10 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (48 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.2 vs 157.5 PassMark/$ ($3,995 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX moves to sTR5 and DDR5.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
2025Xeon Platinum 8352Y
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.4% higher average FPS across 10 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 48 MB).
- ✅Costs $3,566 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $3,995 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 816.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 157.5 vs 17.2 PassMark/$ ($429 MSRP vs $3,995 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on sTR5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+1.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 205W instead of 350W, a 145W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (67,561 vs 68,643).
- ❌70.7% higher power demand at 350W vs 205W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX across 10 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (48 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.2 vs 157.5 PassMark/$ ($3,995 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX moves to sTR5 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX better than Xeon Platinum 8352Y?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX | Xeon Platinum 8352Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 273 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 224 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 174 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 153 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX | Xeon Platinum 8352Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 786 FPS | 233 FPS |
| medium | 643 FPS | 208 FPS |
| high | 477 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 403 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 647 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 422 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 328 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 312 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 273 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 230 FPS | 82 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX | Xeon Platinum 8352Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 888 FPS | 969 FPS |
| medium | 705 FPS | 848 FPS |
| high | 622 FPS | 802 FPS |
| ultra | 534 FPS | 712 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 713 FPS | 775 FPS |
| medium | 567 FPS | 669 FPS |
| high | 489 FPS | 632 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 561 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 507 FPS | 498 FPS |
| medium | 418 FPS | 393 FPS |
| high | 375 FPS | 350 FPS |
| ultra | 315 FPS | 285 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX | Xeon Platinum 8352Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1106 FPS | 893 FPS |
| medium | 991 FPS | 811 FPS |
| high | 867 FPS | 697 FPS |
| ultra | 781 FPS | 599 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 860 FPS | 699 FPS |
| medium | 759 FPS | 613 FPS |
| high | 664 FPS | 525 FPS |
| ultra | 576 FPS | 449 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 632 FPS | 504 FPS |
| medium | 562 FPS | 451 FPS |
| high | 496 FPS | 394 FPS |
| ultra | 429 FPS | 343 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX and Xeon Platinum 8352Y


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 67,561 points. Launch price was $1,649.

Xeon Platinum 8352Y
Xeon Platinum 8352Y
The Xeon Platinum 8352Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-04-06. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 68,643 points. Launch price was $3,995.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8352Y offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8352Y has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8352Y — a 45.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX (base: 4.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is built on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX scores 67,561 against the Xeon Platinum 8352Y's 68,643 — a 1.6% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8352Y. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX vs 48 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8352Y.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX | Xeon Platinum 8352Y |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 32 / 64+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+59% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.5 GHz+105% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+33% | 48 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | — |
| Process | 4 nm-60% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Shimada Peak (2025) | — |
| PassMark | 67,561 | 68,643+2% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 40,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,016 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 23,596 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX uses the sTR5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8352Y uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX versus 3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8352Y — the Xeon Platinum 8352Y supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8352Y supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX) vs 64 (Xeon Platinum 8352Y) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WRX90 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX) and C621A (Xeon Platinum 8352Y).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX | Xeon Platinum 8352Y |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sTR5 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | 3200+63900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 GB+52428700% | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+100% | 64 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8352Y). Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX rivals Xeon w7-3555; Xeon Platinum 8352Y rivals EPYC 7543.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX | Xeon Platinum 8352Y |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX launched at $429 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8352Y debuted at $3995. On MSRP ($429 vs $3995), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is $3566 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX delivers 157.5 pts/$ vs 17.2 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8352Y — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX the 160.7% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX | Xeon Platinum 8352Y |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $429-89% | $3995 |
| Performance per Dollar | 157.5+816% | 17.2 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












