PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $170 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Delivers 37.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 157.5 vs 114.2 PassMark/$ ($429 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (23,596 vs 60,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 300 MB).
❌16.7% higher power demand at 350W vs 300W.

Xeon Platinum 8571N

2023

Why buy it

✅+154.3% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+368.8% larger total L3 cache (300 MB vs 64 MB).
✅Draws 300W instead of 350W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 114.2 vs 157.5 PassMark/$ ($599 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

2025

Xeon Platinum 8571N

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $170 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Delivers 37.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 157.5 vs 114.2 PassMark/$ ($429 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅+154.3% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+368.8% larger total L3 cache (300 MB vs 64 MB).
✅Draws 300W instead of 350W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (23,596 vs 60,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 300 MB).
❌16.7% higher power demand at 350W vs 300W.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 114.2 vs 157.5 PassMark/$ ($599 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX better than Xeon Platinum 8571N?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is ahead with a 6.8% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8571N pulls ahead with 154.3% better Geekbench multi-core. Xeon Platinum 8571N also has the bigger cache pool with 368.8% larger total L3 cache (300 MB vs 64 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8571N is the better fit. You are getting 154.3% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 52 cores and 104 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 368.8% larger total L3 cache (300 MB vs 64 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is the smarter buy today. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is $170 cheaper on MSRP at $429 MSRP versus $599 MSRP, and it gives you a 6.8% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon Platinum 8571N is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 154.3% better Geekbench multi-core. It is also 37.9% better value on MSRP (157.5 vs 114.2 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023). That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX Benchmark Check

Xeon Platinum 8571N Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX	Xeon Platinum 8571N
1080p
low	297 FPS	188 FPS
medium	270 FPS	165 FPS
high	223 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	188 FPS	106 FPS
1440p
low	273 FPS	155 FPS
medium	224 FPS	131 FPS
high	174 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	153 FPS	82 FPS
4K
low	187 FPS	70 FPS
medium	154 FPS	63 FPS
high	118 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	104 FPS	40 FPS

Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX Open Xeon Platinum 8571N

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX	Xeon Platinum 8571N
1080p
low	781 FPS	515 FPS
medium	642 FPS	456 FPS
high	476 FPS	372 FPS
ultra	402 FPS	306 FPS
1440p
low	641 FPS	421 FPS
medium	546 FPS	379 FPS
high	420 FPS	318 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	253 FPS
4K
low	360 FPS	259 FPS
medium	310 FPS	237 FPS
high	271 FPS	210 FPS
ultra	228 FPS	174 FPS

Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX Open Xeon Platinum 8571N

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX	Xeon Platinum 8571N
1080p
low	888 FPS	910 FPS
medium	705 FPS	838 FPS
high	622 FPS	791 FPS
ultra	534 FPS	698 FPS
1440p
low	713 FPS	782 FPS
medium	567 FPS	716 FPS
high	489 FPS	673 FPS
ultra	414 FPS	601 FPS
4K
low	507 FPS	528 FPS
medium	418 FPS	444 FPS
high	375 FPS	396 FPS
ultra	315 FPS	330 FPS

Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX Open Xeon Platinum 8571N

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX	Xeon Platinum 8571N
1080p
low	1106 FPS	1036 FPS
medium	991 FPS	917 FPS
high	867 FPS	790 FPS
ultra	781 FPS	674 FPS
1440p
low	860 FPS	849 FPS
medium	759 FPS	727 FPS
high	664 FPS	623 FPS
ultra	576 FPS	528 FPS
4K
low	632 FPS	617 FPS
medium	562 FPS	541 FPS
high	496 FPS	477 FPS
ultra	429 FPS	404 FPS

Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX Open Xeon Platinum 8571N

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX and Xeon Platinum 8571N

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 67,561 points. Launch price was $1,649.

Xeon Platinum 8571N

The Xeon Platinum 8571N is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 52 cores and 104 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 300 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5 @ 4800 MT/s (1 DPC). Passmark benchmark score: 68,385 points. Launch price was $6,839.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8571N offers 52 cores / 104 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8571N has 36 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8571N — a 29.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX (base: 4.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX uses the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8571N uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX scores 67,561 against the Xeon Platinum 8571N's 68,385 — a 1.2% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8571N. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,016 vs 1,961, a 42.4% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 23,596 vs 60,000 (87.1% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8571N). L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX vs 300 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8571N.

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX	Xeon Platinum 8571N
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	52 / 104+225%
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+35%	4 GHz
Base Clock	4.5 GHz+88%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)	300 MB (total)+369%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	4 nm-43%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Shimada Peak (2025)	Emerald Rapids (2023)
PassMark	67,561	68,385+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi	40,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	3,016+54%	1,961
Geekbench 6 Multi	23,596	60,000+154%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX uses the sTR5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8571N uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. The Xeon Platinum 8571N supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8571N) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WRX90 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX) and C741 (Xeon Platinum 8571N).

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX	Xeon Platinum 8571N
Socket	sTR5	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6400	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	2048 GB	4096 GB+100%
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+60%	80

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8571N). Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8571N targets Cloud Server. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX rivals Xeon w7-3555; Xeon Platinum 8571N rivals EPYC 9454.

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX	Xeon Platinum 8571N
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	true	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Cloud Server

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX launched at $429 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8571N debuted at $599. On MSRP ($429 vs $599), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is $170 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX delivers 157.5 pts/$ vs 114.2 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8571N — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX the 31.9% better value option.