PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

2020

Why buy it

✅+54.2% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+70.7% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 75 MB).
✅Costs $1,552 less on MSRP ($1,337 MSRP vs $2,889 MSRP).
✅Delivers 114.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 46.6 vs 21.7 PassMark/$ ($1,337 MSRP vs $2,889 MSRP).
✅Draws 280W instead of 300W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w7-3465X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Xeon w7-3465X moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon w7-3465X

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +53.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (16,351 vs 25,211).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (75 MB vs 128 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.7 vs 46.6 PassMark/$ ($2,889 MSRP vs $1,337 MSRP).

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

2020

Xeon w7-3465X

2023

Why buy it

✅+54.2% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+70.7% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 75 MB).
✅Costs $1,552 less on MSRP ($1,337 MSRP vs $2,889 MSRP).
✅Delivers 114.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 46.6 vs 21.7 PassMark/$ ($1,337 MSRP vs $2,889 MSRP).
✅Draws 280W instead of 300W, a 20W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +53.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w7-3465X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Xeon w7-3465X moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (16,351 vs 25,211).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (75 MB vs 128 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.7 vs 46.6 PassMark/$ ($2,889 MSRP vs $1,337 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX better than Xeon w7-3465X?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Xeon w7-3465X is ahead with a 53.0% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX pulls ahead with 54.2% better Geekbench multi-core. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX also has the bigger cache pool with 70.7% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 75 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is the better fit. You are getting 54.2% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 70.7% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 75 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is the smarter buy today. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is $1,552 cheaper on MSRP at $1,337 MSRP versus $2,889 MSRP, and it gives you 54.2% better Geekbench multi-core. The trade-off is that Xeon w7-3465X is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 53.0% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 114.7% better value on MSRP (46.6 vs 21.7 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon w7-3465X is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of sWRX8, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX Benchmark Check

Xeon w7-3465X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX	Xeon w7-3465X
1080p
low	183 FPS	311 FPS
medium	149 FPS	301 FPS
high	126 FPS	242 FPS
ultra	98 FPS	204 FPS
1440p
low	160 FPS	270 FPS
medium	127 FPS	233 FPS
high	101 FPS	175 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	154 FPS
4K
low	73 FPS	184 FPS
medium	61 FPS	157 FPS
high	48 FPS	118 FPS
ultra	40 FPS	106 FPS

Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX Open Xeon w7-3465X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX	Xeon w7-3465X
1080p
low	579 FPS	682 FPS
medium	499 FPS	593 FPS
high	383 FPS	482 FPS
ultra	327 FPS	427 FPS
1440p
low	485 FPS	551 FPS
medium	425 FPS	489 FPS
high	338 FPS	415 FPS
ultra	274 FPS	341 FPS
4K
low	304 FPS	324 FPS
medium	270 FPS	288 FPS
high	231 FPS	267 FPS
ultra	202 FPS	234 FPS

Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX Open Xeon w7-3465X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX	Xeon w7-3465X
1080p
low	681 FPS	1025 FPS
medium	564 FPS	1057 FPS
high	497 FPS	974 FPS
ultra	425 FPS	834 FPS
1440p
low	570 FPS	1001 FPS
medium	479 FPS	888 FPS
high	424 FPS	802 FPS
ultra	364 FPS	656 FPS
4K
low	417 FPS	600 FPS
medium	333 FPS	517 FPS
high	293 FPS	461 FPS
ultra	234 FPS	397 FPS

Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX Open Xeon w7-3465X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX	Xeon w7-3465X
1080p
low	1020 FPS	1294 FPS
medium	917 FPS	1015 FPS
high	765 FPS	985 FPS
ultra	664 FPS	851 FPS
1440p
low	802 FPS	1048 FPS
medium	701 FPS	909 FPS
high	584 FPS	784 FPS
ultra	496 FPS	656 FPS
4K
low	559 FPS	780 FPS
medium	504 FPS	681 FPS
high	437 FPS	583 FPS
ultra	373 FPS	437 FPS

Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX Open Xeon w7-3465X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and Xeon w7-3465X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2020-07-14. It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,261 points. Launch price was $4,499.

Xeon w7-3465X

The Xeon w7-3465X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 75 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 62,663 points. Launch price was $2,889.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon w7-3465X offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-3465X — a 13.3% clock advantage for the Xeon w7-3465X (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon w7-3465X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX scores 62,261 against the Xeon w7-3465X's 62,663 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon w7-3465X. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,260 vs 1,959, a 43.4% lead for the Xeon w7-3465X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 25,211 vs 16,351 (42.6% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX). L3 cache: 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX vs 75 MB on the Xeon w7-3465X.

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX	Xeon w7-3465X
Cores / Threads	32 / 64+14%	28 / 56
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz	4.8 GHz+14%
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+40%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	128 MB+71%	75 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	2 MB (per core)+300%
Process	7 nm, 12 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Matisse (2019−2020)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	62,261	62,663
Cinebench R23 Multi	42,986	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,260	1,959+55%
Geekbench 6 Multi	25,211+54%	16,351

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX uses the sWRX8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w7-3465X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w7-3465X — the Xeon w7-3465X supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w7-3465X supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX) vs 112 (Xeon w7-3465X) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX) and Intel W790 (Xeon w7-3465X).

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX	Xeon w7-3465X
Socket	sWRX8	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	DDR5-4800+25%
Max RAM Capacity	2048 GB	4096 GB+100%
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+14%	112

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Xeon w7-3465X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support true virtualization. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX rivals Xeon W-3375; Xeon w7-3465X rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX	Xeon w7-3465X
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	Yes	Yes
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	true	true

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX launched at $1337 MSRP, while the Xeon w7-3465X debuted at $2889. On MSRP ($1337 vs $2889), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is $1552 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX delivers 46.6 pts/$ vs 21.7 pts/$ for the Xeon w7-3465X — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX the 72.9% better value option.