
Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $588 less on MSRP ($749 MSRP vs $1,337 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 76.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 82.2 vs 46.6 PassMark/$ ($749 MSRP vs $1,337 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 280W, a 225W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FL1 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (61,578 vs 62,261).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
2020Why buy it
- ✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 9955HX3D across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 46.6 vs 82.2 PassMark/$ ($1,337 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
- ❌409.1% higher power demand at 280W vs 55W.
- ❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 9955HX3D moves to FL1 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 9955HX3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
2025Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $588 less on MSRP ($749 MSRP vs $1,337 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 76.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 82.2 vs 46.6 PassMark/$ ($749 MSRP vs $1,337 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 280W, a 225W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FL1 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (61,578 vs 62,261).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 9955HX3D across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 46.6 vs 82.2 PassMark/$ ($1,337 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
- ❌409.1% higher power demand at 280W vs 55W.
- ❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 9955HX3D moves to FL1 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 9955HX3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 9955HX3D better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 287 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 217 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 183 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 170 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 150 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 153 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 698 FPS | 579 FPS |
| medium | 601 FPS | 499 FPS |
| high | 448 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 327 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 579 FPS | 485 FPS |
| medium | 517 FPS | 425 FPS |
| high | 398 FPS | 338 FPS |
| ultra | 311 FPS | 274 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 325 FPS | 304 FPS |
| medium | 294 FPS | 270 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 231 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 202 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 851 FPS | 681 FPS |
| medium | 696 FPS | 564 FPS |
| high | 627 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 539 FPS | 425 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 680 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 479 FPS |
| high | 490 FPS | 424 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 364 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 417 FPS |
| medium | 401 FPS | 333 FPS |
| high | 361 FPS | 293 FPS |
| ultra | 302 FPS | 234 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1080 FPS | 1020 FPS |
| medium | 976 FPS | 917 FPS |
| high | 854 FPS | 765 FPS |
| ultra | 768 FPS | 664 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 853 FPS | 802 FPS |
| medium | 753 FPS | 701 FPS |
| high | 660 FPS | 584 FPS |
| ultra | 571 FPS | 496 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 622 FPS | 559 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 504 FPS |
| high | 494 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 426 FPS | 373 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 9955HX3D and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX


Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
The Ryzen 9 9955HX3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Fire Range-HX (Zen 5) (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FL1. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 61,578 points. Launch price was $700.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2020-07-14. It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,261 points. Launch price was $4,499.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 9955HX3D packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX — a 25% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 9 9955HX3D uses the Fire Range-HX (Zen 5) (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D scores 61,578 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX's 62,261 — a 1.1% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D vs 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 32 / 64+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+29% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz+40% |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total) | 128 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Fire Range-HX (Zen 5) (2025) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 61,578 | 62,261+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 42,986 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,260 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 25,211 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 9955HX3D uses the FL1 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX — the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 96 — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 9955HX3D) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX). PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen 9 9955HX3D) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FL1 (Ryzen 9 9955HX3D) and AMD WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FL1 | sWRX8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 5600+139900% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 96 | 2048 GB+2236962033% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 128+357% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen 9 9955HX3D) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX). The Ryzen 9 9955HX3D includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon 610M), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 9955HX3D rivals Core Ultra 9 185H; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX rivals Xeon W-3375.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon 610M | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | true |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 9 9955HX3D launched at $749 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX debuted at $1337. On MSRP ($749 vs $1337), the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D is $588 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D delivers 82.2 pts/$ vs 46.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX — making the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D the 55.4% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $749-44% | $1337 |
| Performance per Dollar | 82.2+76% | 46.6 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












