
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
Popular choices:

Xeon Platinum 8168
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
2018Why buy it
- ✅+93.9% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 33 MB).
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (31,945 vs 32,373).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,799 MSRP, while Xeon Platinum 8168 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌22% higher power demand at 250W vs 205W.
Xeon Platinum 8168
2017Why buy it
- ✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 205W instead of 250W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (33 MB vs 64 MB).
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
2018Xeon Platinum 8168
2017Why buy it
- ✅+93.9% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 33 MB).
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 205W instead of 250W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (31,945 vs 32,373).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,799 MSRP, while Xeon Platinum 8168 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌22% higher power demand at 250W vs 205W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (33 MB vs 64 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX better than Xeon Platinum 8168?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX | Xeon Platinum 8168 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 198 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 177 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 73 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX | Xeon Platinum 8168 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 536 FPS | 403 FPS |
| medium | 483 FPS | 350 FPS |
| high | 404 FPS | 292 FPS |
| ultra | 354 FPS | 246 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 473 FPS | 350 FPS |
| medium | 424 FPS | 310 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 260 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 217 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 295 FPS | 228 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 213 FPS | 149 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX | Xeon Platinum 8168 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 768 FPS | 809 FPS |
| medium | 640 FPS | 787 FPS |
| high | 577 FPS | 744 FPS |
| ultra | 504 FPS | 659 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 640 FPS | 722 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 617 FPS |
| high | 465 FPS | 583 FPS |
| ultra | 408 FPS | 515 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 469 FPS | 465 FPS |
| medium | 377 FPS | 364 FPS |
| high | 336 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 280 FPS | 263 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX | Xeon Platinum 8168 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 799 FPS | 809 FPS |
| medium | 799 FPS | 783 FPS |
| high | 704 FPS | 686 FPS |
| ultra | 616 FPS | 597 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 730 FPS | 689 FPS |
| medium | 644 FPS | 604 FPS |
| high | 549 FPS | 526 FPS |
| ultra | 474 FPS | 452 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 523 FPS | 483 FPS |
| medium | 473 FPS | 434 FPS |
| high | 419 FPS | 388 FPS |
| ultra | 362 FPS | 338 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX and Xeon Platinum 8168


Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
The Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 August 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 31,945 points. Launch price was $1,799.

Xeon Platinum 8168
Xeon Platinum 8168
The Xeon Platinum 8168 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 32,373 points. Launch price was $5,890.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8168 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8168 — a 12.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX (base: 3 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX uses the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8168 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX scores 31,945 against the Xeon Platinum 8168's 32,373 — a 1.3% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8168. L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX vs 33 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8168.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX | Xeon Platinum 8168 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+33% | 24 / 48 |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+14% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+11% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB+94% | 33 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 24 MB+4700% |
| Process | 12 nm-14% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Zen+ (2018−2019) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 31,945 | 32,373+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 33,213 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,206 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 7,612 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8168 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2933 on the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX versus 2666 on the Xeon Platinum 8168 — the Xeon Platinum 8168 supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 768 — 90.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX) vs 6 (Xeon Platinum 8168). PCIe lanes: 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX) vs 48 (Xeon Platinum 8168) — the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X399 (Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX) and C621 (Xeon Platinum 8168).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX | Xeon Platinum 8168 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | 2666+66550% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 GB+279620167% | 768 |
| RAM Channels | 4 | 6+50% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 64+33% | 48 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Platinum 8168 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8168). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX targets Extreme Content Creation. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX rivals Core i9-9980XE; Xeon Platinum 8168 rivals EPYC 7501.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX | Xeon Platinum 8168 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Extreme Content Creation | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











