
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
Popular choices:

Xeon E-2488
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
2018Why buy it
- ✅+121.4% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2488 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,799 MSRP, while Xeon E-2488 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌163.2% higher power demand at 250W vs 95W.
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Xeon E-2488 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Xeon E-2488
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 250W, a 155W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,000 vs 33,213).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 64 MB).
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
2018Xeon E-2488
2023Why buy it
- ✅+121.4% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 250W, a 155W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2488 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,799 MSRP, while Xeon E-2488 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌163.2% higher power demand at 250W vs 95W.
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Xeon E-2488 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,000 vs 33,213).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 64 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E-2488 better than Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX | Xeon E-2488 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 198 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 177 FPS | 248 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 223 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 73 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 88 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX | Xeon E-2488 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 536 FPS | 652 FPS |
| medium | 483 FPS | 557 FPS |
| high | 404 FPS | 468 FPS |
| ultra | 354 FPS | 426 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 473 FPS | 564 FPS |
| medium | 424 FPS | 504 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 427 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 367 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 295 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 301 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 285 FPS |
| ultra | 213 FPS | 251 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX | Xeon E-2488 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 768 FPS | 647 FPS |
| medium | 640 FPS | 529 FPS |
| high | 577 FPS | 466 FPS |
| ultra | 504 FPS | 404 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 640 FPS | 589 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 490 FPS |
| high | 465 FPS | 426 FPS |
| ultra | 408 FPS | 371 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 469 FPS | 427 FPS |
| medium | 377 FPS | 376 FPS |
| high | 336 FPS | 341 FPS |
| ultra | 280 FPS | 288 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX | Xeon E-2488 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 799 FPS | 797 FPS |
| medium | 799 FPS | 797 FPS |
| high | 704 FPS | 737 FPS |
| ultra | 616 FPS | 663 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 728 FPS | 794 FPS |
| medium | 644 FPS | 712 FPS |
| high | 549 FPS | 618 FPS |
| ultra | 474 FPS | 545 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 522 FPS | 544 FPS |
| medium | 473 FPS | 496 FPS |
| high | 419 FPS | 445 FPS |
| ultra | 362 FPS | 389 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX and Xeon E-2488


Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
The Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 August 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 31,945 points. Launch price was $1,799.

Xeon E-2488
Xeon E-2488
The Xeon E-2488 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 31,888 points. Launch price was $606.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon E-2488 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX versus 5.6 GHz on the Xeon E-2488 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2488 (base: 3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX uses the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon E-2488 uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX scores 31,945 against the Xeon E-2488's 31,888 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 33,213 vs 15,000 (75.6% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,206 vs 2,100, a 54.1% lead for the Xeon E-2488 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 7,612 vs 12,000 (44.7% advantage for the Xeon E-2488). L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2488.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX | Xeon E-2488 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+300% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz | 5.6 GHz+33% |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz | 3.2 GHz+7% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB+167% | 24 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 12 nm | Intel 7 nm-42% |
| Architecture | Zen+ (2018−2019) | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 31,945 | 31,888 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 33,213+121% | 15,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,206 | 2,100+74% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 7,612 | 12,000+58% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E-2488 uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2933 on the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon E-2488 — the Xeon E-2488 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX) vs 2 (Xeon E-2488). PCIe lanes: 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX) vs 20 (Xeon E-2488) — the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX offers 44 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X399 (Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX) and W680 (Xeon E-2488).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX | Xeon E-2488 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | DDR5-4800+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 GB+1500% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 4+100% | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 64+220% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon E-2488). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX targets Extreme Content Creation, Xeon E-2488 targets Entry-level Server / Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX rivals Core i9-9980XE; Xeon E-2488 rivals Xeon E-2388G.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX | Xeon E-2488 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Extreme Content Creation | Entry-level Server / Workstation |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











