
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 5320H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.1% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+132.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 28 MB).
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,799 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 5320H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 250W vs 150W.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Gold 5320H
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 250W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (22,000 vs 33,213).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (28 MB vs 64 MB).
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
2018Xeon Gold 5320H
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.1% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+132.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 28 MB).
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 250W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,799 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 5320H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 250W vs 150W.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (22,000 vs 33,213).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (28 MB vs 64 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX better than Xeon Gold 5320H?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX | Xeon Gold 5320H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 198 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 177 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 73 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX | Xeon Gold 5320H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 536 FPS | 448 FPS |
| medium | 483 FPS | 390 FPS |
| high | 404 FPS | 328 FPS |
| ultra | 354 FPS | 296 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 473 FPS | 398 FPS |
| medium | 424 FPS | 352 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 260 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 295 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 213 FPS | 186 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX | Xeon Gold 5320H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 768 FPS | 789 FPS |
| medium | 640 FPS | 636 FPS |
| high | 577 FPS | 562 FPS |
| ultra | 504 FPS | 494 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 640 FPS | 612 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 500 FPS |
| high | 465 FPS | 442 FPS |
| ultra | 408 FPS | 384 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 469 FPS | 437 FPS |
| medium | 377 FPS | 344 FPS |
| high | 336 FPS | 304 FPS |
| ultra | 280 FPS | 244 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX | Xeon Gold 5320H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 799 FPS | 793 FPS |
| medium | 799 FPS | 793 FPS |
| high | 704 FPS | 687 FPS |
| ultra | 616 FPS | 600 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 728 FPS | 721 FPS |
| medium | 644 FPS | 632 FPS |
| high | 549 FPS | 535 FPS |
| ultra | 474 FPS | 465 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 522 FPS | 489 FPS |
| medium | 473 FPS | 438 FPS |
| high | 419 FPS | 392 FPS |
| ultra | 362 FPS | 338 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX and Xeon Gold 5320H


Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
The Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 August 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 31,945 points. Launch price was $1,799.

Xeon Gold 5320H
Xeon Gold 5320H
The Xeon Gold 5320H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Cooper Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 RDIMM. Passmark benchmark score: 31,718 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5320H offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX versus 4.2 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5320H — identical boost frequencies (base: 3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX uses the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5320H uses Cooper Lake-SP (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX scores 31,945 against the Xeon Gold 5320H's 31,718 — a 0.7% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 33,213 vs 22,000 (40.6% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,206 vs 1,350, a 11.3% lead for the Xeon Gold 5320H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 7,612 vs 11,000 (36.4% advantage for the Xeon Gold 5320H). L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX vs 27.5 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 5320H.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX | Xeon Gold 5320H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+60% | 20 / 40 |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+25% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB+133% | 27.5 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 12 nm-14% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Zen+ (2018−2019) | Cooper Lake-SP (2021) |
| PassMark | 31,945 | 31,718 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 33,213+51% | 22,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,206 | 1,350+12% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 7,612 | 11,000+45% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5320H uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2933 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 1120 GB — 58.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 5320H). PCIe lanes: 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 5320H) — the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X399 (Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX) and C621A (Xeon Gold 5320H).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX | Xeon Gold 5320H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 GB+83% | 1120 GB |
| RAM Channels | 4 | 6+50% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 64+33% | 48 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Gold 5320H supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Gold 5320H). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX targets Extreme Content Creation, Xeon Gold 5320H targets High-density Server. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX rivals Core i9-9980XE; Xeon Gold 5320H rivals EPYC 7313.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX | Xeon Gold 5320H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Extreme Content Creation | High-density Server |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











