
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 5118
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.6% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+93.9% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 17 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $549 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 5118 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌71.4% higher power demand at 180W vs 105W.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Gold 5118
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 180W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,744 vs 16,829).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (17 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
2017Xeon Gold 5118
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.6% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+93.9% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 17 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 180W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $549 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 5118 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌71.4% higher power demand at 180W vs 105W.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,744 vs 16,829).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (17 MB vs 32 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper 1900X better than Xeon Gold 5118?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | Xeon Gold 5118 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 227 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 163 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 118 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | Xeon Gold 5118 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 421 FPS | 247 FPS |
| medium | 401 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 280 FPS | 150 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 219 FPS |
| medium | 353 FPS | 194 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 253 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 165 FPS | 95 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | Xeon Gold 5118 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 421 FPS | 419 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 419 FPS |
| ultra | 421 FPS | 419 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 421 FPS | 419 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 419 FPS |
| ultra | 399 FPS | 419 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 421 FPS | 419 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 365 FPS |
| high | 324 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 270 FPS | 262 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | Xeon Gold 5118 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 421 FPS | 419 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 419 FPS |
| ultra | 421 FPS | 419 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 421 FPS | 419 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 419 FPS |
| ultra | 421 FPS | 417 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 421 FPS | 419 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 402 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 360 FPS |
| ultra | 371 FPS | 311 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Xeon Gold 5118


Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
The Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 16,829 points. Launch price was $549.

Xeon Gold 5118
Xeon Gold 5118
The Xeon Gold 5118 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB. L2 cache: 12 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 16,744 points. Launch price was $1,273.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper 1900X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5118 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon Gold 5118 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5118 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper 1900X uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5118 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X scores 16,829 against the Xeon Gold 5118's 16,744 — a 0.5% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs 16.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 5118.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | Xeon Gold 5118 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 12 / 24+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+25% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+65% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+94% | 16.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 12 MB+2300% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Zen (2017−2020) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 16,829 | 16,744 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper 1900X uses the SP3r2 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5118 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | Xeon Gold 5118 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3r2 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | 2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 768 |
| RAM Channels | — | 6 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 48 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen Threadripper 1900X) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 5118). Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 5118 rivals EPYC 7301.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | Xeon Gold 5118 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











