Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs Xeon Gold 5118

AMD

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X

8 Cores16 Thrd180 WWMax: 4 GHz2017

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon Gold 5118

12 Cores24 Thrd105 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2017

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X

2017

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +13.6% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +93.9% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 17 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $549 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 5118 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 71.4% higher power demand at 180W vs 105W.
  • No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Gold 5118

2017

Why buy it

  • Draws 105W instead of 180W, a 75W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (16,744 vs 16,829).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (17 MB vs 32 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper 1900X better than Xeon Gold 5118?
Yes. Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 13.6% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.5% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 13.6% more average FPS across 3 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is the better fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 93.9% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 17 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is the smarter buy today. Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is at an unclear MSRP at $549 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 13.6% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (30.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Gold 5118 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRyzen Threadripper 1900XXeon Gold 5118
1080p
low227 FPS170 FPS
medium198 FPS134 FPS
high163 FPS109 FPS
ultra118 FPS87 FPS
1440p
low183 FPS138 FPS
medium152 FPS108 FPS
high120 FPS86 FPS
ultra87 FPS68 FPS
4K
low71 FPS65 FPS
medium63 FPS55 FPS
high49 FPS43 FPS
ultra39 FPS34 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRyzen Threadripper 1900XXeon Gold 5118
1080p
low421 FPS247 FPS
medium401 FPS214 FPS
high341 FPS190 FPS
ultra280 FPS150 FPS
1440p
low392 FPS219 FPS
medium353 FPS194 FPS
high301 FPS171 FPS
ultra245 FPS136 FPS
4K
low253 FPS159 FPS
medium228 FPS144 FPS
high206 FPS124 FPS
ultra165 FPS95 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRyzen Threadripper 1900XXeon Gold 5118
1080p
low421 FPS419 FPS
medium421 FPS419 FPS
high421 FPS419 FPS
ultra421 FPS419 FPS
1440p
low421 FPS419 FPS
medium421 FPS419 FPS
high421 FPS419 FPS
ultra399 FPS419 FPS
4K
low421 FPS419 FPS
medium362 FPS365 FPS
high324 FPS322 FPS
ultra270 FPS262 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRyzen Threadripper 1900XXeon Gold 5118
1080p
low421 FPS419 FPS
medium421 FPS419 FPS
high421 FPS419 FPS
ultra421 FPS419 FPS
1440p
low421 FPS419 FPS
medium421 FPS419 FPS
high421 FPS419 FPS
ultra421 FPS417 FPS
4K
low421 FPS419 FPS
medium421 FPS402 FPS
high421 FPS360 FPS
ultra371 FPS311 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Xeon Gold 5118

AMD

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X

The Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 16,829 points. Launch price was $549.

Intel

Xeon Gold 5118

The Xeon Gold 5118 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB. L2 cache: 12 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 16,744 points. Launch price was $1,273.

Processing Power

The Ryzen Threadripper 1900X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5118 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon Gold 5118 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5118 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper 1900X uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5118 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X scores 16,829 against the Xeon Gold 5118's 16,744 — a 0.5% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs 16.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 5118.

FeatureRyzen Threadripper 1900XXeon Gold 5118
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
12 / 24+50%
Boost Clock
4 GHz+25%
3.2 GHz
Base Clock
3.8 GHz+65%
2.3 GHz
L3 Cache
32 MB+94%
16.5 MB
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
12 MB+2300%
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Zen (2017−2020)
Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark
16,829
16,744
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Threadripper 1900X uses the SP3r2 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5118 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen Threadripper 1900XXeon Gold 5118
Socket
SP3r2
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
2400
Max RAM Capacity
768
RAM Channels
6
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
48
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen Threadripper 1900X) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 5118). Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 5118 rivals EPYC 7301.

FeatureRyzen Threadripper 1900XXeon Gold 5118
Integrated GPU
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d