
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Popular choices:

Xeon E-2278G
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
2017Why buy it
- ✅+0% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $549 MSRP, while Xeon E-2278G mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌125% higher power demand at 180W vs 80W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Xeon E-2278G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Xeon E-2278G
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 180W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics P630, while Ryzen Threadripper 1900X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,825 vs 16,829).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
2017Xeon E-2278G
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 180W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics P630, while Ryzen Threadripper 1900X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $549 MSRP, while Xeon E-2278G mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌125% higher power demand at 180W vs 80W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Xeon E-2278G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,825 vs 16,829).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E-2278G better than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | Xeon E-2278G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 227 FPS | 265 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 240 FPS |
| high | 163 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 118 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 233 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 91 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | Xeon E-2278G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 421 FPS | 417 FPS |
| medium | 401 FPS | 348 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 308 FPS |
| ultra | 280 FPS | 276 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 369 FPS |
| medium | 353 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 285 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 246 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 253 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 223 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 165 FPS | 185 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | Xeon E-2278G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 421 FPS | 421 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 421 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 421 FPS |
| ultra | 421 FPS | 414 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 421 FPS | 421 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 421 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 421 FPS |
| ultra | 399 FPS | 362 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 421 FPS | 421 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 390 FPS |
| high | 324 FPS | 341 FPS |
| ultra | 270 FPS | 275 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | Xeon E-2278G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 421 FPS | 421 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 421 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 421 FPS |
| ultra | 421 FPS | 421 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 421 FPS | 421 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 421 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 421 FPS |
| ultra | 421 FPS | 421 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 421 FPS | 421 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 421 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 421 FPS |
| ultra | 371 FPS | 364 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Xeon E-2278G


Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
The Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 16,829 points. Launch price was $549.

Xeon E-2278G
Xeon E-2278G
The Xeon E-2278G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 May 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 16,825 points. Launch price was $494.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Xeon E-2278G share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X versus 5 GHz on the Xeon E-2278G — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2278G (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper 1900X uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E-2278G uses Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X scores 16,829 against the Xeon E-2278G's 16,825 — a 0% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs 16 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2278G.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | Xeon E-2278G |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz | 5 GHz+25% |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+12% | 3.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+100% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Zen (2017−2020) | Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 16,829 | 16,825 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper 1900X uses the SP3r2 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E-2278G uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | Xeon E-2278G |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3r2 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen Threadripper 1900X) / VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Xeon E-2278G). The Xeon E-2278G includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics P630), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon E-2278G targets Server.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | Xeon E-2278G |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel UHD Graphics P630 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x / VT-d / EPT |
| Target Use | — | Server |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











