
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Popular choices:

Xeon D-1848TER
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +28.7% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 15 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,829 vs 16,952).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $549 MSRP, while Xeon D-1848TER mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌215.8% higher power demand at 180W vs 57W.
Xeon D-1848TER
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 57W instead of 180W, a 123W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (15 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
2017Xeon D-1848TER
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +28.7% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 15 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 57W instead of 180W, a 123W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,829 vs 16,952).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $549 MSRP, while Xeon D-1848TER mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌215.8% higher power demand at 180W vs 57W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (15 MB vs 32 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon D-1848TER better than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | Xeon D-1848TER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 227 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 163 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 118 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | Xeon D-1848TER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 421 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 401 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 280 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 353 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 253 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 165 FPS | 58 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | Xeon D-1848TER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 421 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 424 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 424 FPS |
| ultra | 421 FPS | 398 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 421 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 424 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 376 FPS |
| ultra | 399 FPS | 328 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 421 FPS | 404 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 313 FPS |
| high | 324 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 270 FPS | 214 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | Xeon D-1848TER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 421 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 424 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 424 FPS |
| ultra | 421 FPS | 424 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 421 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 424 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 424 FPS |
| ultra | 421 FPS | 418 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 421 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 401 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 357 FPS |
| ultra | 371 FPS | 308 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Xeon D-1848TER


Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
The Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 16,829 points. Launch price was $549.

Xeon D-1848TER
Xeon D-1848TER
The Xeon D-1848TER is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 15360 kB. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 57 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 16,952 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper 1900X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon D-1848TER offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon D-1848TER has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon D-1848TER — a 25.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is built on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X scores 16,829 against the Xeon D-1848TER's 16,952 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon D-1848TER. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs 15360 kB on the Xeon D-1848TER.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | Xeon D-1848TER |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 10 / 20+25% |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+29% | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+90% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+113% | 15360 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | — |
| Process | 14 nm | — |
| Architecture | Zen (2017−2020) | — |
| PassMark | 16,829 | 16,952 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper 1900X uses the SP3r2 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon D-1848TER uses FCBGA2227 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | Xeon D-1848TER |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3r2 | FCBGA2227 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











