
Ryzen 7 7445HS
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-2690 v4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 7445HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 135W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,008 vs 19,255).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 35 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2690 v4, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
Xeon E5-2690 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅+118.8% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $2,090 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7445HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌285.7% higher power demand at 135W vs 35W.
Ryzen 7 7445HS
2023Xeon E5-2690 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 135W, a 100W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅+118.8% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,008 vs 19,255).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 35 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2690 v4, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $2,090 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7445HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌285.7% higher power demand at 135W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 7445HS better than Xeon E5-2690 v4?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7445HS | Xeon E5-2690 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7445HS | Xeon E5-2690 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 454 FPS | 364 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 330 FPS |
| high | 314 FPS | 279 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 224 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 388 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 284 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 242 FPS |
| ultra | 240 FPS | 188 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 120 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7445HS | Xeon E5-2690 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 475 FPS | 481 FPS |
| medium | 475 FPS | 481 FPS |
| high | 475 FPS | 481 FPS |
| ultra | 475 FPS | 481 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 475 FPS | 481 FPS |
| medium | 475 FPS | 481 FPS |
| high | 475 FPS | 481 FPS |
| ultra | 443 FPS | 481 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 475 FPS | 447 FPS |
| medium | 439 FPS | 363 FPS |
| high | 374 FPS | 331 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 277 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7445HS | Xeon E5-2690 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 475 FPS | 481 FPS |
| medium | 475 FPS | 481 FPS |
| high | 475 FPS | 481 FPS |
| ultra | 475 FPS | 481 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 475 FPS | 481 FPS |
| medium | 475 FPS | 481 FPS |
| high | 475 FPS | 481 FPS |
| ultra | 475 FPS | 461 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 475 FPS | 481 FPS |
| medium | 475 FPS | 470 FPS |
| high | 436 FPS | 416 FPS |
| ultra | 371 FPS | 358 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 7445HS and Xeon E5-2690 v4


Ryzen 7 7445HS
Ryzen 7 7445HS
The Ryzen 7 7445HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 May 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 19,008 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-2690 v4
Xeon E5-2690 v4
The Xeon E5-2690 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 35 MB. L2 cache: 3.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 19,255 points. Launch price was $2,090.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 7445HS packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2690 v4 offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon E5-2690 v4 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7445HS versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2690 v4 — a 29.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7445HS (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Ryzen 7 7445HS uses the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon E5-2690 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 7445HS scores 19,008 against the Xeon E5-2690 v4's 19,255 — a 1.3% lead for the Xeon E5-2690 v4. L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 7445HS vs 35 MB on the Xeon E5-2690 v4.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7445HS | Xeon E5-2690 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 14 / 28+133% |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz+34% | 3.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+23% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 35 MB+119% |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+71% | 3.5 MB |
| Process | 4 nm-71% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Phoenix (2023−2024) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 19,008 | 19,255+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 7445HS uses the FP7/FP7r2 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2690 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7445HS | Xeon E5-2690 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7/FP7r2 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 1536 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 4 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 40 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












