Ryzen 7 7445HS vs Xeon E5-2682 v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 7445HS

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 120W, a 85W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 40 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2682 v4, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.

Xeon E5-2682 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+150% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7445HS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (18,971 vs 19,008).
❌242.9% higher power demand at 120W vs 35W.

Ryzen 7 7445HS

2023

Xeon E5-2682 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 120W, a 85W reduction.

Why buy it

✅+150% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 40 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2682 v4, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7445HS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (18,971 vs 19,008).
❌242.9% higher power demand at 120W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 7445HS better than Xeon E5-2682 v4?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E5-2682 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 7445HS is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 7445HS is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 9.1% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 7445HS is the better fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 7445HS still looks like the safer overall buy. Ryzen 7 7445HS is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 9.1% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 7445HS is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 16/32. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 7 7445HS Benchmark Check

Xeon E5-2682 v4 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 7445HS	Xeon E5-2682 v4
1080p
low	177 FPS	177 FPS
medium	144 FPS	152 FPS
high	117 FPS	119 FPS
ultra	95 FPS	95 FPS
1440p
low	151 FPS	149 FPS
medium	121 FPS	124 FPS
high	97 FPS	94 FPS
ultra	80 FPS	76 FPS
4K
low	85 FPS	69 FPS
medium	74 FPS	61 FPS
high	59 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	38 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 7445HS Open Xeon E5-2682 v4

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 7445HS	Xeon E5-2682 v4
1080p
low	454 FPS	365 FPS
medium	362 FPS	331 FPS
high	314 FPS	279 FPS
ultra	268 FPS	225 FPS
1440p
low	388 FPS	314 FPS
medium	321 FPS	285 FPS
high	286 FPS	243 FPS
ultra	240 FPS	189 FPS
4K
low	292 FPS	195 FPS
medium	247 FPS	178 FPS
high	225 FPS	153 FPS
ultra	187 FPS	121 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 7445HS Open Xeon E5-2682 v4

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 7 7445HS	Xeon E5-2682 v4
1080p
low	475 FPS	474 FPS
medium	475 FPS	474 FPS
high	475 FPS	458 FPS
ultra	475 FPS	410 FPS
1440p
low	475 FPS	474 FPS
medium	475 FPS	436 FPS
high	475 FPS	389 FPS
ultra	443 FPS	349 FPS
4K
low	475 FPS	400 FPS
medium	439 FPS	322 FPS
high	374 FPS	287 FPS
ultra	308 FPS	239 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 7445HS Open Xeon E5-2682 v4

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 7 7445HS	Xeon E5-2682 v4
1080p
low	475 FPS	474 FPS
medium	475 FPS	474 FPS
high	475 FPS	474 FPS
ultra	475 FPS	474 FPS
1440p
low	475 FPS	474 FPS
medium	475 FPS	474 FPS
high	475 FPS	474 FPS
ultra	475 FPS	461 FPS
4K
low	475 FPS	474 FPS
medium	475 FPS	470 FPS
high	436 FPS	415 FPS
ultra	371 FPS	355 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 7445HS Open Xeon E5-2682 v4

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 7445HS and Xeon E5-2682 v4

Ryzen 7 7445HS

The Ryzen 7 7445HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 May 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 19,008 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-2682 v4

The Xeon E5-2682 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Max frequency: 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 40 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCLGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 18,971 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 7445HS packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2682 v4 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon E5-2682 v4 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7445HS versus 2.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2682 v4 — a 61.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7445HS. The Ryzen 7 7445HS uses the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon E5-2682 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 7445HS scores 19,008 against the Xeon E5-2682 v4's 18,971 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen 7 7445HS. L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 7445HS vs 40 MB on the Xeon E5-2682 v4.

Feature	Ryzen 7 7445HS	Xeon E5-2682 v4
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	16 / 32+167%
Boost Clock	4.7 GHz+88%	2.5 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz	—
L3 Cache	16 MB	40 MB+150%
L2 Cache	6 MB+50%	4 MB
Process	4 nm-71%	14 nm
Architecture	Phoenix (2023−2024)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	19,008	18,971

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 7445HS uses the FP7/FP7r2 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2682 v4 uses FCLGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.