
Core Ultra 7 266V
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 7445HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core Ultra 7 266V
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 17W instead of 35W, a 18W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2833 with DDR5 support instead of FP7/FP7r2 and older memory support.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $520 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7445HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Ryzen 7 7445HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,008 vs 19,274).
- ❌105.9% higher power demand at 35W vs 17W.
- ❌Older platform position on FP7/FP7r2, while Core Ultra 7 266V moves to FCBGA2833 and DDR5.
Core Ultra 7 266V
2024Ryzen 7 7445HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 17W instead of 35W, a 18W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2833 with DDR5 support instead of FP7/FP7r2 and older memory support.
Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $520 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7445HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,008 vs 19,274).
- ❌105.9% higher power demand at 35W vs 17W.
- ❌Older platform position on FP7/FP7r2, while Core Ultra 7 266V moves to FCBGA2833 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 7 266V better than Ryzen 7 7445HS?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 266V | Ryzen 7 7445HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 243 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 185 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 266V | Ryzen 7 7445HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 236 FPS | 458 FPS |
| medium | 195 FPS | 362 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 314 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 268 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 210 FPS | 392 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 240 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 155 FPS | 295 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 225 FPS |
| ultra | 114 FPS | 187 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 266V | Ryzen 7 7445HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 482 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 482 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 482 FPS | 475 FPS |
| ultra | 482 FPS | 475 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 482 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 482 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 482 FPS | 475 FPS |
| ultra | 468 FPS | 443 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 482 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 462 FPS | 439 FPS |
| high | 404 FPS | 374 FPS |
| ultra | 336 FPS | 308 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 266V | Ryzen 7 7445HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 482 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 482 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 482 FPS | 475 FPS |
| ultra | 482 FPS | 475 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 482 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 482 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 482 FPS | 475 FPS |
| ultra | 482 FPS | 475 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 482 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 482 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 480 FPS | 436 FPS |
| ultra | 418 FPS | 371 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 266V and Ryzen 7 7445HS

Core Ultra 7 266V
Core Ultra 7 266V
The Core Ultra 7 266V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,274 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 7445HS
Ryzen 7 7445HS
The Ryzen 7 7445HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 May 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 19,008 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 7 266V packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7445HS offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core Ultra 7 266V has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 266V versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7445HS — a 6.2% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 266V (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 266V uses the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7445HS uses Phoenix (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 266V scores 19,274 against the Ryzen 7 7445HS's 19,008 — a 1.4% lead for the Core Ultra 7 266V. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 266V vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 7445HS.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 266V | Ryzen 7 7445HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8+33% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+6% | 4.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 3.2 GHz+45% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 16 MB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2.5 MB (per core) | 6 MB+140% |
| Process | 3 nm-25% | 4 nm |
| Architecture | Lunar Lake (2024) | Phoenix (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 19,274+1% | 19,008 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 7 266V uses the FCBGA2833 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 7445HS uses FP7/FP7r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 266V | Ryzen 7 7445HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2833 | FP7/FP7r2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













